Search

Background: More than 670 million people have been infected by COVID-19. This case series reports 8 of 55 cases in a broader study of COVID-positive clients who sought homeopathic care for symptoms. Existing studies of homeopathy and COVID-19 have sometimes failed to employ the underpinning theoretical framework of homeopathy-the genus epidemicus . Special focus has been placed on standout symptoms not often reported in conventional medical outlets, known among homeopaths as "strange, rare and peculiar" (SRP) symptoms. The Homeopathy Help Network (HHN) team of practitioners noted SRP symptoms across dozens of cases and studied how they shifted collectively as different variants of the virus emerged., Methods: COVID-positive individuals self-selected for individualized care for their symptoms using homeopathy. They received tele-health consultations and individualized homeopathy interventions in an out-patient homeopathy clinical setting. Clients were seen by individual professional homeopathy practitioners and students under supervision working at the HHN in the United States. Cases for the series were hand-picked with the aim of being an average representation of the more than 4,000 COVID-positive cases seen by members of the HHN. Cases in the full compendium are grouped according to a predominant case feature: Multiple remedies, Posology, Time ill, Single remedy resolution, Hospitalization and, in this case series, SRP symptoms., Results: SRP symptoms included: continually on the verge of unconsciousness; dark green stools; very low pulse alternating with tachycardia; sensation of strong or burning chemical smells; sensation of inhaling water through the nose; recurring electric shock sensations in head or extremities; yellow-green stools., Conclusion: Collective SRP symptoms from the pandemic provided the opportunity to study the hallmark features of COVID-19 in depth. The importance of these symptoms highlights the applicability of Hahnemannian principles and good case-taking practices., Competing Interests: None declared., (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: In 2020, HOHM Foundation launched Homeopathy Help Now (HHN), a network of professional homeopathy telehealth practitioners, administrative volunteers, and independent researchers to work collaboratively in order to respond to the urgent need of care for the ever-growing number of COVID-19 cases in the United States. Methods: in this pragmatic case series study, cases of positively testing or probable COVID-19 (n = 3495) are analyzed using conventional quantitative analysis. The sample includes clinical data collected from clients who attended the clinic between 23 March 2020 and 31 December 2023. Results: The youngest client at the clinic was less than one year old, and the eldest was 92. Many of the participants at this clinical facility were adults (58.1%), with fewer (41.9%) aged 0–17. Many were female (61.7%), while fewer were male (32.4). Most clients found their symptoms improved at final contact (83.6%), and the majority of individual remedy responses improved symptoms (73.7%) over the course of their care. Discussion: Health Services and Public Health research projects are warranted to investigate the ways in which such a necessary stop-gap clinical service as HHN could become implemented in early- and later-phase response to pandemics. HHN's collaborative, horizontally integrated team structure was essential for the creation of the novel approach needed to address the serious symptoms of COVID-19. Moreover, HHN's organizational model draws on a mutual aid structure, whereby dynamic, flexible systems are created that empower a community to meet emerging needs, especially when more formal structures are strained, failing or simply unavailable. Further research is urgently needed into the implementation and benefits of innovative, flexible healthcare structures, such as the one used in this study, that can meet the unpredictable and fluctuating public health needs in our changing world. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]