1. Comparison of the second and third waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in South Korea: Importance of early public health intervention.
- Author
-
Seong H, Hyun HJ, Yun JG, Noh JY, Cheong HJ, Kim WJ, and Song JY
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, COVID-19 prevention & control, Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Physical Distancing, Republic of Korea epidemiology, Young Adult, COVID-19 epidemiology, Public Health, SARS-CoV-2
- Abstract
Objectives: To compare epidemiologic features of the second and third waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in South Korea., Methods: Nationwide COVID-19 data were collected between 6 May and 30 December 2020. The degree of social activity was estimated using an Internet search trend analysis program for leisure-related keywords, including 'eating-out', 'trip' and 'get directions' (transportation). Demographics, transmission chains, case fatality rates, social activity levels and public health responses were compared between the second (13 August-18 September 2020) and third (4 November 2020-present) waves., Results: In comparison with the second wave, the third wave was characterized by delayed strengthening of social distancing policies (3 vs. 15 days), longer duration (36 vs. >56 days) and a higher case fatality rate (0.91% vs. 1.26%). There were significant differences in transmission chains between the second and third waves (P < 0.01). In comparison with the second wave, the proportion of local clusters (24.8% vs. 45.7%) was lower in the third wave, and personal contact transmission (38.5% vs. 25.9%) and unknown routes of transmission (23.5% vs. 20.8%) were higher in the third wave., Conclusion: Early and timely interventions with strengthened social distancing policies should be implemented to suppress and control the COVID-19 pandemic effectively., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF