Search

OBJECTIVE Different types of surgical procedures are utilized to treat craniosynostosis. In most procedures, the fused suture is removed. There are only a few reports on the evolution of sutures after surgical correction of craniosynostosis. To date, no published study describes neosuture formation after total cranial vault remodeling. The objective of this study was to understand the evolution of the cranial bones in the area of coronal and lambdoid sutures that were removed for complete vault remodeling in patients with sagittal craniosynostosis. In particular, the investigation aimed to confirm the possibility of neosuture formation. METHODS CT images of the skulls of children who underwent operations for scaphocephaly at the Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, Lyon University Hospital, Lyon, France, from 2004 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis, age between 4 and 18 months at surgery, and availability of reliable postoperative CT images obtained at a minimum of 1 year after surgical correction. Twenty-six boys and 11 girls were included, with a mean age at surgery of 231.6 days (range 126–449 days). The mean interval between total vault reconstruction and CT scanning was 5.3 years (range 1.1–12.2 years). RESULTS Despite the removal of both the coronal and lambdoid sutures, neosutures were detected on the 3D reconstructions. All combinations of neosuture formation were seen: visible lambdoid and coronal neosutures (n = 20); visible lambdoid neosutures with frontoparietal bony fusion (n = 12); frontoparietal and parietooccipital bony fusion (n = 3); and visible coronal neosutures with parietooccipital bony fusion (n = 2). CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to report the postoperative skull response after the removal of normal patent sutures following total vault remodeling in patients with isolated sagittal synostosis. The reappearance of a neosuture is rather common, but its incidence depends on the type of suture. The outcome of the suture differs with the incidence of neosuture formation between these transverse sutures. This might imply genetic and functional differences among cranial sutures, which still have to be elucidated.