Search

Introduction: The incidence of brain tumors has increased in elderly population overtime. Their eligibility to a major surgery remains a questionable subject. This study evaluated prognostic factors and 30-days morbidity and mortality in octogenarian population who underwent craniotomy for resection of brain tumor., Materials and Methods: A total of 154 patients were divided into two different groups: patients above 80 years old and patients below 65 years old. In both groups, patients were stratified based on diagnosis with benign tumors [meningioma] and malignant tumors [high-grade gliomas and metastases]. Multivariable logistic regression model with backward elimination method was utilized to identify the independent risk factors for 30-days readmission and post-operative complications., Results: The analysis revealed no significant difference in 30-day readmission ( p  = 0.7329), 30-day mortality (0.6854) or in post-operative complication ( p  = 0.3291) between age ≥ 80 and age ≤ 65 groups. A longer length of stay (LOS) was observed in the older patients ( p  = 0.0479). There was a significant difference in the pre-post KPS between the two groups ( p  < 0.0001). ASA ( p  = 0.0315) and KPS ( p  = 0.071) were found as important prognostic factors associated with post-operative mortality in both groups., Conclusion: Octogenarians can withstand craniotomy without any significant increase in 30-day readmission, 30-day mortality and post-operative complications as compared to patients younger than age 65. The ASA score (>3) and/or KPS (<70) were the most important prognostic factors for 30-days readmission and mortality.

Purpose: The past two decades have witnessed the rise of keyhole microscopic minimally invasive surgeries, including the transciliary supraorbital approach (TCA) and transpalpebral approach (TPA), commonly known as the transorbital approach. This study aims to elucidate the nuances, specific indications, and advantages of each approach., Methods: A series of dissections were conducted on five formalin-fixed, alcohol-preserved cadaver heads. The TCA was performed on one side, and the TPA on the other. Virtual measurements of working angles for both approaches were recorded. Additionally, three clinical cases were presented to illustrate the practical application of the techniques., Results: For TCA, the craniotomy dimensions were 1.7 cm x 2.5 cm (Cranial-Caudal (CC) x Lateral-Lateral (LL)), while for TPA, they measured 2.1 cm x 2.9 cm (CC x LL). The measurements of anterior clinoid processes (ACP) were obtained and compared between approaches. In the TCA, the mean ipsilateral ACP measurement was 62 mm (Range: 61 -63 mm), and the mean contralateral ACP measurement was 71.2 mm (Range: 70 -72 mm). In TPA, these measurements were 47.8 mm (Range: 47 -49 mm) and 62.8 mm (Range: 62 -64 mm), respectively. TCA exhibited an average cranial-caudal angle of 14.9°, while TPA demonstrated an average of 8.3°., Conclusion: The anterior cranial fossa was better exposed by a TCA, which also featured shorter operative times, enhanced midline visualization, and a quicker learning curve. Conversely, the middle fossa was better exposed by a TPA, making it an excellent option for middle fossa pathologies, including those in the anterior temporal lobe. After sphenoid bone wing drilling, the TPA offers superior visualization from the lateral to the medial aspect and enhances the CC angle. Additionally, the TPA reduces the risk of postoperative frontalis palsy based on anatomic landmarks. However, the TPA requires a greater cranial osteotomy, and due to unfamiliarity with eyelid anatomy, the learning curve for most neurosurgeons is lengthier for this procedure., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background Advances in skull base surgery have increased the need for a detailed understanding of skull base anatomy and its intrinsic relationship to surrounding structures. This has resulted in an improvement in patient outcomes. The frontotemporal orbitozygomatic (FTOZ) transcavernous approach (TCA) is an excellent option for treating complex lesions involving multiple compartments of the skull base, including the sellar and parasellar, third ventricle, orbit, and petroclival region. Objective This article aimed to provide a detailed cadaveric dissection accompanying a thorough procedure description, including some tips and pitfalls of this technique. Methods Microsurgical dissection was performed in four freshly injected cadaver heads at the Cranial Base Neuroanatomy Laboratory, Cleveland Clinic Florida. The FTOZ TCA was performed on both sides of the four specimens. The advantages and disadvantages were discussed based on the anatomic nuances of this approach. Results The FTOZ TCA represented a wide access to the anterior, middle, and posterior fossa. When combined with an anterior clinoidectomy, it allowed for significant and safe internal carotid artery mobilization. This approach created numerous windows, including opticocarotid, carotid-oculomotor, supratrochlear, infratrochlear, anteromedial, anterolateral, and posteromedial triangles. The only drawback was the length of the dissection and the level of surgical acumen required to perform it. Conclusion Despite its technical difficulty, the FTOZ TCA should be considered for the surgical management of basilar apex aneurysms and tumors surrounding the cavernous sinus, sellar/parasellar, retrochiasmatic, and petroclival region. Continuous training and dedicated time in the skull base laboratory can help achieve the necessary skills required to perform this approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]