Search

Introduction: Postoperative complications after craniotomy for brain tumors include pain, nausea/vomiting, and infection. A standardized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is not widely accepted for this common neurosurgical procedure. Few studies have explored its application., Methods: A literature search of PubMed, Cochrane, and Google Scholar databases was performed between January 1992 and March 2023. Original studies that implemented an ERAS protocol for patients that underwent craniotomy for brain tumors were included. The following variables were evaluated: hospital length of stay (LOS), postoperative pain, postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) prophylaxis, non-opioid analgesia, and quality of life (QOL)., Results: Twelve studies with a total of 1309 patients met inclusion criteria, including ten randomized controlled trials, one nonrandomized controlled trial, and one quality control study. Most frequently assessed metrics included hospital LOS, PONV prophylaxis, and non-opioid analgesia. A significant reduction in postoperative LOS was observed in 7 studies with ERAS or ERAS components. ERAS was significantly associated with pain reduction on the visual analog scale and verbal numerical rating scale (n=8). Non-opioid analgesia in ERAS improved postoperative pain control (n=4) and decreased the duration of pain (n=1). Three of six studies found no difference in PONV in ERAS vs. control. No studies reported an increase in postoperative complications using ERAS vs. control. One study showed greater patient satisfaction at 30-day follow-up with improved QOL., Conclusion: Implementing ERAS protocol may enhance outcomes and quality of life in patients with moderate evidence for improved recovery in those undergoing craniotomy for brain tumors., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Simple Summary: We provide the first comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis examining the impact of tumor location and treatment modalities on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with meningioma. We systematically reviewed HRQoL outcomes for non-skull base meningiomas (NSBMs), anterior, middle, and posterior fossa skull base meningiomas (SBMs) following neurosurgical and/or radiotherapeutic intervention. The literature was searched for studies that investigated HRQoL following surgical resection, radiosurgery, or radiotherapy and was analyzed to reveal HRQoL outcomes based on tumor location. With regard to therapeutic intervention, craniotomy was associated with significantly higher improvements in postoperative Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores following treatment of anterior/middle skull base meningiomas (SBMs) in comparison to posterior SBMs. The authors further investigate factors that may impact HRQoL and the occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits. Due to a lack of consensus on the use of standardized quantitative tools to measure HRQoL, results are difficult to compare within the literature. We therefore provide recommendations on the utility of pertinent HRQoL instruments based upon skull base region and treatment modality. Patients with meningiomas may have reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL) due to postoperative neurological deficits, cognitive dysfunction, and psychosocial burden. Although advances in surgery and radiotherapy have improved progression-free survival rates, there is limited evidence regarding treatment outcomes on HRQoL. This review examines HRQoL outcomes based on tumor location and treatment modality. A systematic search in PubMed yielded 28 studies with 3167 patients. The mean age was 54.27 years and most patients were female (70.8%). Approximately 78% of meningiomas were located in the skull base (10.8% anterior, 23.3% middle, and 39.7% posterior fossae). Treatment modalities included craniotomy (73.6%), radiotherapy (11.4%), and endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) (4.0%). The Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) was the most commonly utilized HRQoL instrument (27%). Preoperative KPS scores > 80 were associated with increased occurrence of postoperative neurological deficits. A significant difference was found between pre- and post-operative KPS scores for anterior/middle skull base meningiomas (SBMs) in comparison to posterior (SBMs) when treated with craniotomy. Post-craniotomy SF-36 scores were lower for posterior SBMs in comparison to those in the anterior and middle fossae. Risk factors for poor neurological outcomes include a high preoperative KPS score and patients with posterior SBMs may experience a greater burden in HRQoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) located in eloquent brain regions are historically associated with a poor prognosis. Awake craniotomy (AC) with the adjunct of brain mapping has the potential of identifying non-eloquent gyri to maximize resection, thereby theoretically decreasing the risk of neurologic deficits. With limited evidence regarding the efficacy of AC in treatment of eloquent AVMs, this review aims to investigate its surgical outcomes. A systematic search in the PubMed database was performed to identify all relevant studies up to February 2022. A total of 13 studies were extracted for quantitative analysis, yielding a total of 46 patients. The mean age was 34.1 years, and most patients were female (54.8%). Seizures were the most frequently reported presenting symptom (41%, 19 of 46 cases). Spetzler-Martin Grade III was the most prevalent (45.9%, 17 cases) with a mean nidus size of 32.6 mm. Seventy-four percent of AVMs were located on the left side, with the frontal lobe being the most common location (30%, 14 of 46 cases). The most common eloquent regions were language (47.8%, 22 of 46 cases), motor (17.4%, 8 of 46 cases), and language + motor cortices (13.1%, 6 of 46 cases). Complete resection of AVM was achieved in 41 patients (89%). Intraoperative complications occurred in 14 of 46 cases (30.4%) with transient postoperative neurologic deficits in 14 patients (30.4%). AC may enable precise microsurgical excision of eloquent AVMs with preservation of critical brain functions. Risk factors for poor outcomes include eloquent AVMs located in the language + motor regions and the occurrence of intraoperative complications such as seizures/hemorrhage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]