1. Multimodal creativity assessments following acute and sustained microdosing of lysergic acid diethylamide.
- Author
-
Murphy RJ, Sumner RL, Godfrey K, Mabidikama A, Roberts RP, Sundram F, and Muthukumaraswamy S
- Subjects
- Male, Humans, Adult, Young Adult, Double-Blind Method, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Surveys and Questionnaires, Problem Solving drug effects, Creativity, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide administration & dosage, Lysergic Acid Diethylamide pharmacology, Hallucinogens administration & dosage, Hallucinogens pharmacology
- Abstract
Introduction: Enhanced creativity is often cited as an effect of microdosing (taking repeated low doses of a psychedelic drug). There have been recent efforts to validate the reported effects of microdosing, however creativity remains a difficult construct to quantify., Objectives: The current study aimed to assess microdosing's effects on creativity using a multimodal battery of tests as part of a randomised controlled trial of microdosing lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD)., Methods: Eighty healthy adult males were given 10 µg doses of LSD or placebo every third day for six weeks (14 total doses). Creativity tasks were administered at a drug-free baseline session, at a first dosing session during the acute phase of the drug's effects, and in a drug-free final session following the six-week microdosing regimen. Creativity tasks were the Alternate Uses Test (AUT), Remote Associates Task (RAT), Consensual Assessment Technique (CAT), and an Everyday Problem-Solving Questionnaire (EPSQ)., Results: No effect of drug by time was found on the AUT, RAT, CAT, or EPSQ. Baseline vocabulary skill had a significant effect on AUT and RAT scores., Conclusions: Despite participants reporting feeling more creative on dose days, objective measurement found no acute or durable effects of the microdosing protocol on creativity. Possible explanations of these null findings are that laboratory testing conditions may negatively affect ability to detect naturalistic differences in creative performance, the tests available do not capture the facets of creativity that are anecdotally affected by microdosing, or that reported enhancements of creativity are placebo effects., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: This research was conducted with funding from the Health Research Council of New Zealand (Grant No. 20/845 [to SM and RLS]), MindBio Therapeutics Ltd, and three private donors. SM, and RLS have received research funding from MindBio Therapeutics Ltd. to conduct further work in psychedelic microdosing. RJM has received conference support from MindBio Therapeutics Ltd. SM has received funding from atai Life Sciences for unrelated research work., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF