Search

Background: ROS1 gene fusion represents a specific subtype of non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Crizotinib is recommended for ROS1‐positive NSCLC due to its favorable outcome in published clinical trials. However, due to the low incidence of ROS1‐positive NSCLC, there is limited information on real‐world clinical outcomes in patients treated with either crizotinib or platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy. Methods: Outcomes were recorded in 102 patients with stage Ⅲb or Ⅳ NSCLC who were treated at four Chinese hospitals between April, 2010 and June, 2019. Results: Of the 102 patients followed, 71.6% were females, 81.4% were non‐smokers, and 98.0% had adenocarcinoma. First‐line treatment with crizotinib achieved a significantly longer median progression‐free survival (PFS) compared with platinum‐based chemotherapy (14.9 months vs 8.5 months, respectively; P <.001). Next‐generation sequencing (NGS) identified 61 patients who had ROS1 fusion variants, including CD74 (n = 33) and non‐CD74 (n = 28) variants. In patients harboring CD74 fusion variants, the median PFS with first‐line crizotinib treatment was significantly longer than in those harboring non‐CD74 fusion variants (20.1 months vs 12.0 months, respectively; P =.046). However, in patients treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy, there was no significant difference in PFS between the CD74 and non‐CD74 variant groups (8.6 months vs 4.3 months, respectively; P =.115). Overall survival (OS) was not reached. Conclusions: First‐line therapy with crizotinib is more beneficial than platinum‐based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC with different ROS1 fusion variants. Patients harboring CD74 fusion variants appear to respond better to crizotinib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Crizotinib has demonstrated good efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Continuing crizotinib therapy beyond progressive disease (CBPD) can achieve ongoing survival benefit in real‐world clinical practice. In terms of survival, progression‐free survival (PFS), the most commonly used endpoint in efficacy evaluations, may not provide accurate information on the impact of this intervention when crizotinib is administered in sequential therapy. Materials and Methods: A single‐center, retrospective study of 201 ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC patients was conducted to analyze the PFS, overall survival (OS), and treatment duration (TD) of crizotinib. The correlations between the TD of crizotinib and OS in CBPD and non‐CBPD groups of patients were compared. Results: All patients were treated with crizotinib, 150 of whom eventually developed progressive disease (PD). The median PFS1 and PFS2 were 13.2 months and 10.5 months, respectively. The OS of the whole population was 50.5 months. The median TD was 20.7 months, which is shorter than direct PFS1 + PFS2. The TD of crizotinib in CBPD group was significantly longer than that in non‐CBPD group (median 39.7 vs 15.0 months, P < .001). TD correlated better with OS (R = .79) than PFS (R = .64) in the CBPD group. Conclusions: Crizotinib showed good efficacy in patients with ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC. Instead of PFS, treatment duration might be a more reasonable surrogate clinical endpoint in patients who received crizotinib in sequential therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Targeted therapy is an important treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with specific genetic mutations, crizotinib can prolong survival in advanced NSCLC patients with echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4–anaplastic lymphoma kinase (EML4-ALK) rearrangement. We performed a retrospective analysis to investigate the association between the lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with EML4-ALK rearrangement NSCLC receiving treatment with crizotinib. Methods: Advanced (stage IIIb–IV) NSCLC patients with EML4-ALK rearrangement receiving treatment with crizotinib were enrolled between January 2007 and January 2016 at Peking Union Medical College and Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Results: Overall, 212 patients were enrolled. Kaplan–Meier univariate analysis showed that elevated pre-treatment LDH level (7.9 vs 14.1 months, HR =1.251, CI: 1.008–1.553, P=0.004) was significantly associated with shorter PFS, while the post-treatment mean-LDH level (13.3 vs 14.3 months, HR=1.439, 95% CI: 0.994–2.082, P=0.970) was not significantly associated with PFS. Cox proportional hazards model also identified that pre-treatment LDH level (HR=2.085, 95% CI: 1.150–3.781, P=0.016) was associated with the PFS. Logistic regression analysis showed that post-treatment LDH level was associated with creatine kinase (OR=6.712, 95% CI 3.395–13.273, P<0.01), creatine kinase isoenzyme (OR=6.297, 95% CI 2.953–13.427, P<0.01), and hemoglobin (OR=4.163, 1.741–9.956, P<0.001). Conclusion: An elevated pre-treatment serum LDH level (>250 U/L) was significantly associated with shorter PFS in patients with EML4-ALK rearrangement NSCLC. Post-treatment elevated serum LDH level was not significantly associated with PFS, which related to adverse events including muscle damage and anemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) rearrangements are present in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). NSCLCs with ALK -rearrangement can be effectively treated with crizotinib. However, magnitude and duration of responses are found to be heterogeneous. This study explored the clinical efficacy of crizotinib in different ALK variants. Methods Among 96 ALK -rearrangement patients treated with crizotinib, 60 patients were identified with tumor specimens that could be evaluated by next-generation sequencing (NGS). We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy of crizotinib in different ALK variants. Results The median Progression-free survival (PFS) of the 96 ALK -rearrangement patients was 14.17 months. Among the 60 patients with NGS results, the most frequent variants were variant 3a/b (33.33%), variant 1 (23.33%) and variant 2 (15.00%). The percentage of rare EML4 - ALK variants and non EML4 - ALK variants were 10.00% and 18.33%. Survival analysis showed that patients with variant 2 appeared to have longer PFS than others (P = .021); also, patients with TP53 mutation seemed to have an unfavorable PFS than those with TP53 wild-type with a borderline p value (P = .068). After adjusting for other baseline characteristics, EML4 - ALK variant 2 was identified as an important factor for a better PFS of crizotinib. We also found that patients with variant 3a/b had shorter duration of response to crizotinib; however, no significant difference of PFS was observed between the PFS of variant3a/b and non-v3 EML4 - ALK variants. Conclusions Our results indicate prolonged PFS in patients with EML4 - ALK variant 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]