Search

Introduction: Two antitumor necrosis factor therapies (infliximab [IFX] and adalimumab [ADA]) have been approved for the treatment of pediatric Crohn's disease (CD) but have not been compared in head-to-head trials. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ADA and IFX by propensity score matching in a prospective cohort of pediatric patients with luminal CD and at least a 24-month follow-up., Methods: Among 100 patients, 75 met the inclusion criteria, and 62 were matched by propensity score. We evaluated time to treatment escalation as the primary outcome and primary nonresponse, predictors of treatment escalation and relapse, serious adverse events, pharmacokinetics, and effect of concomitant immunomodulators as secondary outcomes., Results: There was no difference between ADA and IFX in time to treatment escalation (HR = 0.63 [95% CI 0.31-1.28] P = 0.20), primary nonresponse (P = 0.95), or serious adverse events. The median (interquartile range) trough levels at the primary outcome were 14.05 (10.88-15.40) and 6.15 (2.08-6.58) µg/mL in the ADA and IFX groups, respectively. On a multivariate analysis, the combination of anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity was a strong independent predictor of treatment escalation (HR 5.19, [95% CI 2.41-11.18], P < 0.0001). The simple endoscopic score for CD, L3 disease phenotype, and use of concomitant immunomodulators for at least the first 6 months revealed a trend toward significance on a univariate analysis., Discussion: Propensity score matching did not reveal substantial differences in efficacy or safety between ADA and IFX. The anti-S. cerevisiae antibody negativity and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody positivity combination is a strong predictor of treatment escalation., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Studies showing a substantial frequency of dermatologic complications in paediatric Crohn's disease (CD) patients on anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy preferentially include patients treated with infliximab. We aimed to identify risk factors for the cumulative incidence of skin complications in a paediatric cohort receiving either adalimumab or infliximab and found an association between current skin complications and the patient's current clinical condition. This study retrospectively evaluated dermatologic complications in an inception cohort of 100 paediatric CD patients receiving the first anti-TNF (Motol PIBD cohort). Patient data were collected every 3 months. The lesions were classified as psoriatic, atopic dermatitis, or others. We used Cox regression to evaluate the association between predefined variables and the time to complication and a generalised linear mixed model to assess the association between the patient's current condition and the occurrence of complications. Among the 89 included children, 35 (39%) presented with dermatologic lesions. The only predictor associated with any complication was infliximab (versus adalimumab) therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03-4.17; p = 0.04). Infliximab therapy (HR: 5.5; 95%CI: 1.59-19.06; p = 0.01) and a family history of atopy (HR: 3.4; 95%CI 1.35-8.57, p = 0.002) were associated with early manifestation of atopic dermatitis. Lower C-reactive protein levels (odds ratio [OR], 0.947; 95% CI, - 0.898 to 0.998; p = 0.046) and infliximab (versus adalimumab) were associated with the occurrence of any dermatologic complications (OR, 5.93; 95% CI, 1.59-22.07; p = 0.008).Conclusion: The frequency of skin complications seems high in paediatric CD patients treated with anti-TNF and is even higher in those treated with infliximab. What is Known: •The dermatologic complications occur during treatment with anti-tumour necrosis factor. •The frequency of skin complications in paediatric patients with Crohn's disease is high. What is New: •Infliximab (vs. adalimumab) was identified as a strong risk factor for the cumulative incidence of skin complications. •Lower C-reactive protein levels were associated with the current occurrence of dermatologic complications., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Discontinuation of anti-TNF therapy in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) in remission remains a controversial issue. The aims of our study were to assess the proportion of patients who relapse after cessation of biological treatment, and to identify potential risk factors of disease relapse., Methods: Consecutive IBD patients who discontinued anti-TNF therapy in steroid-free clinical and endoscopic remission were prospectively followed. Multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional-hazards models were used to assess the predictors of disease relapse., Results: Seventy-eight IBD patients (Crohn's disease, CD 61; ulcerative colitis, UC 17) were included and followed for a median of 30 months (range 7-47). A total of 32 (53%) CD patients and nine (53%) UC patients relapsed by the end of the follow-up with a median time to relapse of 8 months (range 1-25) in CD patients and 14 months (range 4-37) in UC patients, respectively. The cumulative probabilities of maintaining remission at 6, 12, and 24 months were 82%, 59%, and 51% in CD patients, and 77%, 77%, and 64% in UC patients, respectively. Survival of CD patients who were in deep remission (clinical and endoscopic healing; faecal calprotectin <150 mg/kg; CRP ≤5 mg/l) was not better compared with those who did not fulfill these criteria. In multivariate models, only colonic CD protected patients from disease relapse., Conclusions: Approximately half of the IBD patients relapsed within 2 years after anti-TNF discontinuation. In CD patients, no difference between those who were or were not in deep remission was found. Colonic localization protected patients from relapse.