Search

The critical value of soil Olsen-P is the point above which the probability of crop yield response to fertilizer P is small or nil. Determining this critical value is fundamental when making appropriate P fertilizer recommendations. In this study, the critical values were determined for continuous maize ( Zea mays L.)-winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cropping systems from a 15-year field experiment across three sites in China using linear-linear, linear-plateau and Mitscherlich models. The mean critical values for maize using the three models ranged from 12.1 to 17.3 mg P kg−1 (average 15.3 mg P kg−1) and for winter wheat from 12.5 to 19.0 mg P kg−1 (average 16.3 mg P kg−1) among study sites. The mean critical value for maize was approximately 7% lower than that for winter wheat across all sites based on the three models. Critical values identified by the Mitscherlich model were 1.4 to 2.1 times those from linear-linear and 1.3 to 1.9 times of those from linear-plateau and were crop and site dependent. There was a significant negative correlation ( P < 0.05) between the mean critical value from the three models and the observed P uptake by either maize or wheat. Our study shows that the critical values can vary with sites, crops and models used, and thus caution should be taken when selecting the most appropriate one when making P fertilizer recommendations for agronomic return and to minimize chances of negative environment impact from overfertilization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wheat, rice, and maize collectively provide the bulk of energy and protein to the human diet worldwide. Over the last seven decades, China increased 5.8-fold the aggregated production of the three cereals, but further gains are required to meet the predicted demand of 776 Mt. by 2030. Here, we report the rate of genetic gain in yield of 0.65% year-1 for wheat between 1937 and 2012, 0.69% year-1 for rice between 1934 and 2011, and 0.77% year-1 for maize between 1950 and 2014 in China. National farm yield in the same periods increased 1.38% year-1 for wheat, 1.15% year-1 for rice and 1.32% year-1 for maize. Hence, genetic improvement (G) accounted for 47%-60% of the increase in farm yield, with improved management (M) and G × M interaction accounting for the balance. The absolute rate of genetic gain (kg ha-1 year-1) was proportional to environmental potential. Genetic gain in nitrogen utilization efficiency (yield per unit nitrogen uptake) was significant for all three crops and was achieved at the expense in grain N concentration that decreased at 0.19% year-1 in rice and 0.47% year-1 in maize. To guarantee future food security and environmental sustainability, breeding and agronomic efforts need to increase the rate of gain in yield and revert the declining trends in grain protein by improving nitrogen uptake and nitrogen harvest index. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]