1. Predictors of late pulmonary vein reconnection in patients with arrhythmia recurrence after cryoballoon ablation-per vein analysis including cardiac computed tomography-based anatomic factors.
- Author
-
Terasawa M, Chierchia GB, Al Housari M, Bala G, Cosyns B, Droogmans S, Tanaka K, Belsack D, De Mey J, Sieira J, Brugada P, de Asmundis C, and Ströker E
- Subjects
- Humans, Recurrence, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Treatment Outcome, Pulmonary Veins diagnostic imaging, Pulmonary Veins surgery, Atrial Fibrillation diagnostic imaging, Atrial Fibrillation surgery, Cryosurgery methods, Catheter Ablation adverse effects
- Abstract
Aims: To identify predictors of individual late pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection after second-generation cryoballoon (CB2) ablation. Anatomic indicators of late pulmonary vein reconnection (LPVR) post-CB2 ablation have not yet been studied on an individual PV level, nor weighed against clinical and procedural factors., Methods and Results: Clinical, procedural, and PV anatomic data from 125 patients with a repeat procedure for arrhythmia recurrence after index CB2 ablation were analyzed. Preprocedural computed tomography (CT) evaluated 486 PVs for measurement of size; shape (ovality index); carina width; and orientation angle in frontal (superior/inferior) and transversal (anterior/posterior) plane (with horizontal line 0° as reference and upper/lower half circle as positive/negative value, respectively). Durable isolation in all PVs was demonstrated in 50/125 (40%) patients. Late reconnection rates at the different PVs were as follows: 16% left superior (LS), 12% left inferior (LI), 17% right superior (RS), and 31% right inferior (RI) PV. Multivariable analysis performed per vein showed following independent determinants predicting LPVR: ovality index [odds ratio (OR) 1.61, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-2.41, P = 0.022] and carina width (OR 0.75, CI 0.59-0.96, P = 0.024) for LSPV; carina width (OR 0.71, CI 0.53-0.95, P = 0.020) for LIPV; frontal angle (OR 0.91, CI 0.87-0.95, P < 0.001) for RIPV; and transversal angle (OR 1.15, CI 1.03-1.31, P = 0.032) for RSPV., Conclusion: Cardiac CT-based evaluation of anatomic PV characteristics presented higher predictive value compared to clinical and procedural variables for individual LPVR after CB2 ablation. Pre-procedural identification of unfavourable PV anatomy might be important to tailor the ablation approach., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C.d.A. reports speaker fees for Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific; teaching honoraria from Medtronic, Biotronik, Abbott and Boston Scientific; proctoring honoraria from Medtronic, Abbott, and Biotronik; G.-B.C. reports speaker fees for Medtronic, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, and Abbott; teaching honoraria from Medtronic and Biotronik; proctoring honoraria from Medtronic; P.B. reports consulting fees and speaker honoraria from Medtronic. Other authors: no relationships that could be construed as a conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF