Search

In 2004, we started the initial attempt to evaluate the efficacy of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) using Japanese cedar (JC) pollen extract solution through a multicenter, placebo-controlled, double-blind comparative study. Based on its success in demonstrating the substantial efficacy of SLIT, we next conducted a larger-scale study by administering JC pollen to all JCP patients recruited. It was because of aiming to ascertain the effectiveness and safety of SLIT and its underlying mechanisms by comparing high- and non-responder patients. Despite limitations posed by liquid medication, significant effectiveness and safety demonstrated by the 2-year treatment served as the foundation for launching the first SLIT medicine for JCP, in 2014. Furthermore, in addition to the clearer Th1/Th2-imbalanced property in the high-responders, the possible involvement of bitter taste receptors in CD4 + T cells, apoptosis pathways in CD4 + T cells and basophils, and inducing a mast cell degranulation inhibitory molecule in the effect of SLIT was demonstrated. To solve the limitations posed by liquid medication, clinical trials evaluating JC pollen sublingual tablets started in 2014. Due to the minimal side effects, ease of administration, and convenient storage, the sublingual tablet medicine was launched in 2018. Giving the ongoing rise in demand for SLIT and considering that more than 1% of JCP patients are currently undergoing SLIT, the practical use of this treatment for multiple allergens is becoming increasingly important., (Copyright © 2024 Japanese Society of Allergology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is a common allergic rhinitis in Japan. JC pollen sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) tablets are licensed for the treatment of JC pollinosis., Objective: To assess the disease-modifying effects of JC pollen SLIT tablets over 5 years (2014-2019), comprising a 3-year treatment period and 2-year follow-up., Methods: A total of 1042 patients with JC pollinosis (aged 5-64 years) were included in the study. An optimal dose-finding study was performed in the first 15 months, after which 240 patients in the placebo (P) group and 236 patients in the optimal active dose (A) group (5000 Japanese allergy units) were re-randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (designated AA, AP, PA, and PP groups). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) during the peak symptom period of each JC pollen season over 3 years of treatment and 2 years of observation after treatment cessation., Results: The AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly reduced TNSMS; however, the largest relative reduction was seen in the AA group both during the treatment period (third season, 46.3% vs PP, P < .001) and during the 2-year follow-up period (fourth and fifth seasons, 45.3% and 34.0% vs PP, respectively; P < .001). The most common adverse drug reactions were mild reactions at the administration site., Conclusions: JC pollen SLIT tablets show sustained clinical efficacy during 3 years of treatment and sustained disease-modifying effects for at least 2 years after treatment cessation., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Japanese cedar pollinosis is an endemic disease affecting a large proportion of Japan's population. Five seasons have passed since sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis was included in the public insurance coverage in Japan. In this study, we evaluated the clinical effects of long-term SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis on upper respiratory symptoms primarily represented by nasal symptoms and inflammation of the respiratory tract in the 2019 season, in which considerable amount of cedar pollen was dispersed., Methods: This study involved 95 patients who were undergoing SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis after the initiation at some point between 2014 and 2018, and this group of patients was compared with a control group comprising 21 patients receiving preseasonal prophylactic treatment (with a second-generation antihistaminic drug). We evaluated the patients' nasal/eye symptoms, total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS), and quality of life according to relevant guidelines. In addition, the levels of peripheral blood eosinophils, serum total IgE, Japanese cedar antigen-specific IgE, Cryj1-specific IgG4, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) were measured as objective indices., Results: From the fourth season (SLIT4), nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal obstruction symptoms, and TNSMS significantly decreased compared with those in the preseasonal prophylactic treatment and SLIT1 groups. In the patients suspected to have eosinophilic airway inflammation (with a baseline FENO ≥25 ppb), the interannual variability of FENO levels significantly reduced after 5 years of treatment., Conclusion: The efficacy of SLIT was noted from the first year of treatment, even in a year when pollen profusely dispersed. Thus, long-term continuous treatment with SLIT may alleviate nasal symptoms as well as eosinophilic airway inflammation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background: There have been no reports of treatment effect persistence after long-term sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis. Therefore, we conducted a post-marketing clinical trial to investigate the efficacy, safety, and effect persistence of JC pollen SLIT drops after approximately 3 years of treatment., Methods: This was an open-label trial of 233 patients with JC pollinosis who were treated with JC pollen SLIT drops for approximately 3 years (2015-2017) and followed-up for an additional 2 years (2018-2019). Efficacy and effect persistence were evaluated using nasal and ocular symptom scores, daily use of rescue medication, and Japanese Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire scores recorded during the JC pollen dispersal season of each year. Safety was evaluated by monitoring adverse events and adverse drug reactions., Results: The mean combined total nasal symptom and medication score (range 0-18) during the peak symptom periods of 2015 through 2019 were 5.47 ± 3.38, 4.52 ± 3.13, 3.58 ± 2.63, 5.28 ± 4.01, and 6.83 ± 4.65, respectively. The percentage of patients who used no rescue medications during the same periods was 64.8%, 75.2%, 80.3%, 63.7%, and 50.3%, respectively. A total of 138 adverse drug reaction incidents were recorded in 73 of the 233 patients (31.3%), of which 134 incidents (97.1%) were mild in severity., Conclusions: JC pollen SLIT drops demonstrated treatment duration-dependent efficacy with effects that persisted for 2 years after cessation of treatment. The drug had a favorable safety profile over the 5-year study period., (Copyright © 2020 Japanese Society of Allergology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: As part of the planning for a future multicenter study, this preliminary clinical trial used serum samples from patients to identify biomarkers for predicting the therapeutic effects of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP)., Methods: This prospective study included patients undergoing SLIT for JCP at our hospital. All enrolled patients (N = 17) started SLIT between June and November of 2015. With informed consent from the patients, blood samples were obtained in January, March, and June of 2016, and patients completed the Japan rhino-conjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (JRQLQ). On the basis of the JRQLQ results, the 6 patients with the best outcomes were included in the high-response group (HRG), and the 5 patients with the worst outcomes were included in the poor-response group (PRG). We then compared serum data between the two groups, to identify useful biomarkers., Results: IL-12p70 and VEGF levels tended to be higher in the HRG than in the PRG in January, March, and June (0.10 > p > 0.05). In addition, the June IL-17 level was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the HRG than in the PRG., Conclusions: IL-12p70 and VEGF may be useful biomarkers for predicting the effects of SLIT. In addition, although IL-17 does not appear to be useful as a biomarker for evaluating treatment response at the start of SLIT, it may be useful as a biomarker after the beginning phase of SLIT.

Background and Objective: Nasal symptoms of allergic rhinitis can be reduced with allergen-specific subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). However, the mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of SCIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis are not well understood. We studied changes in the numbers of metachromatic cells, eosinophils and neutrophils in nasal swabs following SCIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis., Methods: Subjects were either untreated or given SCIT for 0.5 to 13 years duration. For the 2019 seasons, nasal swabs were taken in the pollinosis preseason (immunotherapy n = 36; untreated control, n = 62) and in the pollinosis season (immunotherapy n = 45; untreated control n = 46) and the numbers of mast cells, eosinophils and neutrophils assessed by microscopy., Results: There were significant improvements in symptom severities following SCIT in comparison to untreated subjects (P < .0003, the Mann-Whitney U test) in preseason, and (P < .00001) in season. Metachromatic cell counts from nasal swabs of SCIT subjects in preseason and in the season were lower than those of untreated subjects (P = .0029 and P = .031, respectively). Eosinophil numbers in nasal swabs of subjects given SCIT were lower than in untreated subjects (P = .0031) in season, but not in preseason. There were no significant differences in degrees of neutrophilia between untreated and SCIT subjects in preseason and in season., Conclusion: One mechanism underlying the effectiveness of SCIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis involves a reduction in the number of metachromatic cells in nasal swabs in the preseason and an inhibition of increases in the number of metachromatic cells and eosinophils in season., (© 2020 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background and Objective: Nasal symptoms were reduced following allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis. The mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis are poorly understood. We studied changes in the numbers of metachromatic cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils following SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis., Methods: Nasal swabs were taken in the preseason (n = 32) and in pollinosis season (n = 49) from subjects given sublingual drop immunotherapy for an average duration of 1.5 years. The numbers of metachromatic cells (mast cells and basophils), eosinophils and neutrophils were determined and compared with those from untreated subjects in preseason (n = 65) and in season (n = 54)., Results: SLIT subjects had a significantly reduced frequency of moderate to most severe symptoms in comparison to untreated subjects in preseason (P < .001, the Mann-Whitney U test), and (P < .00001) in season. Metachromatic cell counts in nasal swabs of SLIT subjects in preseason and in season were lower than those of untreated subjects (P = .014, the Mann-Whitney U test) and (P = .00001) respectively. Eosinophil numbers in SLIT subjects were not significantly different than in untreated subjects in both preseason (P = .29) and in season (P = .09). However, when SLIT subjects in season were divided into those with greater than or equal to 1.5 years, or <1.5 years of SLIT duration, the degree of eosinophilia in those with SLIT greater than or equal to 1.5 years was significantly lower (P = .011) than in untreated patients, but not in those with SLIT less than 1.5 years (P = .9). There were no significant differences in neutrophil numbers in nasal swabs between untreated and SLIT subjects in preseason and in season., Conclusion: One of mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of sublingual drop immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis is a reduction of the number of metachromatic cells in preseason and in season. Eosinophilia was also reduced in season in those given SLIT for greater than or equal to 1.5 years., (© 2020 The Authors. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial to investigate the optimal dose and long-term efficacy and safety of Japanese cedar (JC) pollen tablets for SLIT (JapicCTI-142579). Here, we report details of the effects of the JC pollen SLIT tablet on rhinitis and conjunctivitis symptoms over three pollen dispersal seasons., Methods: A total of 1042 JC pollinosis patients (aged 5-64 years) were randomized to receive tablets containing placebo (P), 2000, 5000, or 10,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) of JC pollen for 15 months to identify an optimal dose. Patients receiving P (n = 240) and the optimal dose (5000 JAU; A, n = 236) were then randomized to receive P or A for an additional 18 months (AA, AP, PA, and PP groups, allocation ratio 2:1:1:2). Nasal and ocular symptoms, rescue medication use, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed on quantitative scales., Results: In the second and third seasons, the AA, AP, and PA groups exhibited significantly better improvements in nasal, ocular, and medication scores compared with the PP group in the order AA > AP > PA > PP during the second season and AA > PA > AP > PP during the third season. Rescue medication use and QOL scores were also significantly better in the AA, AP, and PA groups compared with the PP group., Conclusions: The JC pollen SLIT tablet relieved nasal and ocular symptoms and medication use and improved QOL in a treatment duration-dependent manner. Continuous dosing regimens appear to enhance the efficacy of the drug., (Copyright © 2019 Japanese Society of Allergology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This study aimed to investigate whether interactions between multiple serum cytokines may be implicated in the mechanism of action (MOA) of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis., Methods: A Tokyo Metropolitan Bureau of Social Welfare and Public Health-initiated clinical study of active SLIT involving 202 patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis was jointly conducted by Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science and Nippon Medical School between 2006 and 2008. Fifty target cytokines were quantified in serum samples collected at 6 times from baseline to the end of the study, for 300 cytokine measurements in total, using Bio-Plex Pro Human Cytokine Group I/II Panels. Therapeutic outcome was assessed based on nasal symptom scores and quality-of-life questionnaire results., Results: Fifty-five percent of patients were free of symptoms or reported symptomatic improvements by 2 grades or greater after 2 years of SLIT treatment, while 27% showed no improvement or worsening of symptoms. Thirty-eight patients who benefited the most from treatment (responders) as well as 37 patients who benefited the least from treatment (non-responders) were identified and their serum cytokine profiles were compared. Cluster analysis of the 300 cytokine measurements identified 6 cytokine clusters that were strongly correlated with a positive response to treatment, and this correlation was consistent throughout the treatment., Conclusion: Certain cytokine clusters are strongly correlated with a positive therapeutic outcome, suggesting they have a role in the MOA of immunotherapy.

Background/objective: As few reports are available on treatment goal for Japanese cedar pollinosis treated with allergen immunotherapy, therapeutic effect has to be assessed based on subjective symptoms in clinical practice. This research was conducted to investigate the informative treatment goal in clinical practice by using the results of TO-194SL phase III clinical trial., Methods: In this investigation, correlation between total nasal symptom medication score (TNSMS), which was predefined as the primary endpoint, and secondary endpoints evaluated by severe symptom day, quality of life (QOL) score, and overall evaluation by subject, was firstly investigated. Based on the results, stratified analyses of the secondary endpoints to confirm relationships on the stratified results, TNSMS, and cedar season were performed., Results: Correlation between TNSMS and evaluations which were severe symptom day, QOL score, and overall evaluation by subject was reasonably observed. TNSMS generally showed 3 or below (classified as mild) throughout the entire pollen season when these evaluations reached each threshold., Conclusions: The results of this investigation suggest that a few evaluation items would help patients to realize the therapeutic effects of allergen immunotherapy if they could be the treatment goal in clinical practice.

Background: Environmental exposure chambers have been used to expose subjects to aeroallergens to investigate the efficacy of prophylactic treatment with symptomatic agents in Japan. We first examined the therapeutic effect of bilastine (BIL), a novel non-sedative second-generation H 1 -antihistamine, in subjects with Japanese cedar pollinosis using an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber)., Methods: This was a randomized, double-blind, four-way crossover, placebo- and active-controlled phase II study (trial registration number JapicCTI-132213). Subjects were exposed to cedar pollen (8000 grains/m 3 ) for 2 h on Day -1 and 4 h each on Day 1 and 2. BIL 10 or 20 mg, placebo, or fexofenadine hydrochloride (FEX) 60 mg was administered orally 1 h after the start of pollen exposure on Day 1. Placebo or FEX was administered 12 h after the first dosing. The primary efficacy endpoint was the sum of total nasal symptom score (TNSS) from 0 to 3 h after the Day 1 dosing., Results: We enrolled 136 subjects and the sum of TNSS on Day 1 of the three active treatments was significantly lower than that of placebo and was maintained up to 26 h after the first dosing (Day 2). The sum of TNSS or sneezing score on Day 1 after BIL 20 mg was more significantly decreased than after FEX. Moreover, BIL showed a faster onset of action than FEX., Conclusions: We demonstrated the efficacy, rapid onset, and long duration of action of BIL in subjects with Japanese cedar pollinosis exposed to cedar pollen using the OHIO Chamber., (Copyright © 2016 Japanese Society of Allergology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Unlabelled: Backgroud: It has already been reported that the prophylactic treatment by leukotoriene receptor antagonists is more effective on reducing symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis than the authentic treatment after the pollen dispersal. However, the treatment above has never evaluated in children cases around school age in ENT out-patient clinic. This study about the prophylactic treatment was planned to focus on the effect in the generation of pre- and post-elementary school entrance., Methods: Children of pre- and post-elementary school entrance were enrolled for this study. This study was achieved in seasons of Japanese cedar pollinosis both in 2013 and 2014, and was designed as the comparison of clinical symptoms and quality of life in between two such groups as one group with the prophylactic treatment and another with the authentic treatment., Results: Efficacy of prophylactic treatment by leukotoriene receptor antagonists was elucidated as follows; quality of sleep was significantly better both in 2013 and 2014, and more kinds of clinical symptoms or quality of life impairments were significantly more suppressed than in the group with the authentic treatment in 2014 when less pollen was dispersed., Conclusion: Even in the children of pre- and post-elementary school entrance, the prophylactic treatment by leukotoriene receptor antagonists is more effective on reducing symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis than the authentic treatment.

Background: Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis is the most common seasonal allergic rhinitis in Japan. Standardized JC pollen extract is available for subcutaneous immunotherapy, but this treatment is limited by potentially serious side effects. The aim of this double-blind, randomized comparative study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of standardized JC pollen extract in a new oral formulation (CEDARTOLEN®, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) for sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for JC pollinosis., Methods: A total of 531 subjects with JC pollinosis were randomized into 2 groups at a ratio of 1:1 to receive daily sublingual administration of standardized JC pollen extract with a maintenance dose of 2,000 Japanese allergy units (JAU) or placebo for 2 consecutive pollen seasons. The efficacy was evaluated using the total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS) as the primary end point. Secondary end points included the total ocular symptom and medication score (TOSMS) and scores for individual symptoms and medication., Results: The TNSMS was significantly lower (p < 0.0001) in the SLIT group than in the placebo group in the peak symptom period by 18 and 30% in the first and second seasons, respectively. All secondary end points were also significantly lower in the SLIT group in both seasons. No systemic anaphylaxis occurred., Conclusions: SLIT with daily administration of standardized JC pollen extract was effective for improving nasal and ocular symptoms of JC pollinosis and reducing the use of relief medication. The JC pollen extract was well tolerated with only local adverse events., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Statistically significant results of medical intervention trials are not always clinically meaningful. We sought to estimate the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (the smallest change in a given endpoint that is meaningful to a patient) during seasonal alteration of Japanese cedar/cypress pollinosis (JCCP)., Methods: Results of a double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of JCCP patients conducted between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed using an anchor-based method in which a face scale for Japanese rhinoconjunctivitis quality-of-life questionnaire (JRQLQ) was set as an anchor. MICDs were calculated as changes of average scores, including those for naso-ocular symptoms with 5 items in diary cards (T5SS), naso-ocular symptoms with 6 items (T6SS) and QOL with 17 items on the JRQLQ when face scale scores either improved or deteriorated by one point., Results: In 2009 and 2010, 3,698 and 374, respectively, grains/cm(2) of pollens were dispersed. The MCIDs for T5SS in 2009 and 2010 were 1.426 (0.285 per item) and 1.441 (0.288), respectively. The MCIDs for T6SS were 4.115 (0.686) and 3.183 (0.531) in 2009 and 2010, respectively. The MCIDs for QOL were 10.469 (0.616) and 6.026 (0.354) in 2009 and 2010, respectively., Conclusions: For T5SS in the diary, T6SS and QOL in JRQLQ, unit differences of 1.5 (0.3 per item), 3.6 (0.6) and 8.2 (0.5), respectively, were considered clinically meaningful by JCCP patients. The MCID for symptoms recorded in the diary was stable irrespective of the dispersed pollen level.

Background: Previously, we reported that nasal symptom appeared in some patients of Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) before season. Over than 50% of them had neutrophils (no eosinophil) in their nasal smear (less than 10%; eosinophils), and Staphylococcus aureus or epidermis by culture were detected in more than 90% of them. We thought the attack caused from rhinitis by Staphylococcus., Method: For more details of these bacterium in JCP, we enforced bacterial culture in the nose and cytology in the nasal smear in asymptomatic (PreAs), symptomatic in pre-season (PreSy), and symptomatic in season (InSy) of JCP in 2011., Results: Positive rates of Staphylococcus aureus were 79%, 75%, 53%, Staphylococcus epidermis; 15%, 10%, 16%, Moraxella catarrhalis; 9%, 25%, 19%, and Streptococcus Pneumonia; 7%, 12%, 16% in PreAs (n=53), PreSy (60), and InSy (70) respectively. Cytology showed that 45% of PreAs (n=53), 65% of PreSy (60) with statistical higher in latter group, and 8% of InSy (72) were only neutrophils in nasal smear. Six% of PreAs, 2% of PreSy, and 51% of InSy were eosinophils. Forty-three% of PreAs with statistical higher than 22% of PreSy and 7% of InSy were nasal cell free., Conclusion: These results mean the inflammation by Staphylococcus species or Moraxella catarrhalis might involve symptom appearance in pre-season.

Background: This study intended to assess the severity of Japanese cedar pollinosis using the Practical Guideline for the Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Japan (PG-MARJ) and the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) Guideline., Methods: An Internet questionnaire survey of patients with pollinosis was conducted in mid-May 2011 and responses were obtained from 3382 individuals who had potential symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis from February to early May 2011 and who had experienced such symptoms for at least two pollen seasons., Results: According to PG-MARJ, 23.5% of the respondents had severest rhinitis, 29.4% severe rhinitis, 31.3% moderate rhinitis, 13.8% mild rhinitis and 2.0% asymptomatic rhinitis. According to ARIA, 67.2% of them had moderate/severe persistent rhinitis, 23.8% moderate/severe intermittent rhinitis, 4.4% mild persistent rhinitis and 4.6% mild intermittent rhinitis., Conclusions: Moderate to severe rhinitis was diagnosed in more than 80% of the respondents according to PG-MARJ, while moderate/severe rhinitis was diagnosed in more than 90% of the respondents according to ARIA. Most of the respondents suffered relatively severe pollinosis. More than 80% of the respondents had all the three major symptoms (i.e., sneezing, rhinorrhea and nasal blockage). Disagreement in the severity assessment between the two guidelines was noted in approximately 20% of the respondents.

Pranlukast (PLK) is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor 1 antagonist approved for the treatment of bronchial asthma and allergic rhinitis in Japan. We previously reported that PLK dry syrup (DS) improved the total nasal symptom score, as well as sneezing, nasal discharge, and nasal obstruction scores over placebo. We investigated the efficacy of PLK DS with a noninvasive method in 10- to 15-year-old children with Japanese cedar (JC) pollinosis challenged with pollen allergen using an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber). Levels of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in nasal secretions, nasal obstruction score, and the relationship with nasal obstruction scores were analyzed. The estimated difference of means in ECP levels (PLK DS--placebo) was -22.9 micrograms (95% CI, -45.2 to -0.5), suggesting PLK DS reduced ECP significantly when compared with placebo (p = 0.0454). The difference in the least square means for nasal obstruction between the PLK DS and placebo was -0.25 (95% CI, -0.36 to -0.14) with a value of p < 0.0001. In addition, a statistically significant, although weak, positive correlation between the nasal obstruction score and nasal ECP levels was observed with placebo treatment (correlation coefficient = 0.2394; p = 0.0428). Moreover, the inhibition rate of nasal ECP with PLK DS relative to placebo was statistically significant, although weak, positively correlated with the inhibition rate of nasal obstruction (correlation coefficient = 0.3373; p = 0.0219). PLK DS significantly decreases nasal ECP levels and nasal obstruction score compared with placebo in children with JC pollinosis challenged with pollen allergen. Suppression of mucosal eosinophilic inflammation is one of the pathways by which PLK DS improves pollinosis-induced nasal obstruction.

Pranlukast (PLK) is a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) that has been approved for treatment of asthma in patients of all ages and allergic rhinitis (AR) in adults but not for AR in children in Japan. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study used an artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber) to investigate the efficacy and safety of PLK in children from 10 to 15 years old with seasonal AR (SAR) due to Japanese cedar (JC) pollen. Eighty-four subjects were enrolled and randomized to the treatment arm and 74 were included in the per protocol set. Subjects received either PLK dry syrup (DS) or placebo for 1 week. They were challenged with JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber for 3 hours. Total nasal symptom scores (TNSSs) were recorded every 30 minutes during the exposure. PLK DS treatment suppressed the TNSS changes from baseline significantly when compared with placebo. The difference in the least square means in TNSS between the PLK DS-treated group and placebo group was -0.37 (95% CI, -0.54, -0.20) with a value of p < 0.0001, showing that PLK DS significantly suppressed the nasal symptoms. Regarding specific nasal symptoms, PLK DS significantly suppressed sneezing, nasal discharge, and nasal obstruction. The effect of PLK DS on nasal obstruction was most prominent, with significant improvement relative to placebo beginning 60 minutes after the start of exposure. No serious adverse events were reported during the study. In this study, PLK DS is effective and safe for treatment in children with SAR.

Background: Leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) are effective for prophylactic treatment of pollinosis based on studies showing that administration of LTRAs prior to or at the start of the pollen season reduces symptoms and QOL disturbance at the peak of pollen dispersal. Two goals of prophylactic treatment of pollinosis are use of fewer types of drugs and delay of onset of symptoms and impairement of QOL. Therefore, this study was performed to determine if pranlukast, a LTRA, met these goals in treatment of pollinosis., Methods: Pranlukast or placebo was administered to patients who visited our hospital immediately before the start of Japanese cedar pollen dispersal. The study was performed for 4 weeks as a double blind randomized trial. Subsequently, all patients were given pranlukast for a further 4 weeks from the peak until the end of pollen dispersal. The incidence of symptoms and use of concomitant drugs were investigated from daily nasal allergy records kept by patients. QOL was evaluated using the JRQLQ questionnaire., Results: In the double blind period of the study, the percentage of patients who used concomitant drugs for nasal symptoms was significantly lower in the pranlukast group compared to the placebo group. Development of nasal symptoms (sneezing, runny nose and nasal congestion) and disturbance of daily activities were significantly delayed in the pranlukast group. No serious adverse reactions occurred in the pranlukast group and no patient withdrew from treatment with pranlukast., Conclusions: Pranlukast is effective for prophylactic treatment of pollinosis.

Background: Although sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) is hopeful therapy for seasonal allergic rhinitis by Japanese cedar pollen, there are many issues to study. We studied the adding effects on clinical efficacy by the treated years and sustained efficacy 1 year after a 3-year period of SLIT., Methods: Clinical efficacy of SLIT in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis treated for different years of 1 year (n=7), 2 years (n=18) or 4 years (n=5) were compared in 2009. Patients, who finished SLIT after a 3-year period and did not received SLIT at the fourth year (n=12), was also compared with those who received SLIT at the fourth year (n=5)., Results: By adding treated year, clinical efficacy of sneezing, rhinorrhea and congestion became better, and symptom-medication score (SMS) was significantly better in the fourth year of SLIT. Patients with the fourth year of SLIT showed better SMS compared with those who finished at the third year., Conclusion: Consecutive treatment of SLIT showed better efficacy. Although it was recommended to continue SLIT therapy at least four years, it needed further study because of small number of patients.

Purpose: According to the 2008 survey conducted by Baba et al., the average prevalence of Japanese cedar-pollen allergy is 26.5% in Japan, although there are great regional differences in the prevalence of this disease. In this study, we investigated the causes of its regional differences., Methods: Regional differences in the 2008 prevalence of cedar-pollen allergy in 47 prefectures, obtained by Baba et al., were examined in terms of the correlations with the following factors: mean cedar pollen count in each region, the pollen dispersal period, relative humidity in February and March, and the concentrations of SPM, NOx and Ox. The pollen counts of cedar and cypress and the sum of these pollen counts were also measured., Results: The prevalence of cedar-pollen allergy had the highest correlation with the pollen dispersal period, followed by the correlation with the pollen count and relative humidity in the order. There was no statistically significant correlation between the prevalence of cedar-pollen allergy and air pollutants such as SPM.

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted to determine whether oral administration of heat-killed Lactobacillus gasseri OLL2809 would affect the immune response and reduce the symptoms of Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) in subjects with JCP. Following a 1-week pre-observation period, the subjects were randomly divided into two groups and were orally administered a placebo or tablets containing 100 mg of L. gasseri OLL2809 per d for 8 weeks during the pollen season in 2007. The results showed no obvious differences between the groups. Supplementary subgroup analysis revealed that the OLL2809 subgroups with CAP-RAST scores of 4 or 5 exhibited improvement in nasal symptoms scores and serum allergy-related items, including Japanese cedar pollen-specific IgE levels. L. gasseri OLL2809 was found to be effective in reducing symptoms in subjects with a high predisposition to allergies by modulating systemic immune systems.

The prevalence of pollinosis caused by cedar pollen has increased by 10% these ten years of 26.5% in the investigation of 2008 in Japan. The pharmacotherapy is a main treatment tool for pollinosis, and the surgical treatment is not acknowledged to the treatment of pollinosis internationally. Moreover, allergen immunotherapy enters a special treatment method, and is an important therapeutic procedure. The allergen immunotherapy is unique for having possibility of curing allergen specific allergic diseases. However the side effect of allergen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT), such as anaphylaxis is kept at a distance in a medical situation in Japan. Then, a sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) that was safer than it, developed in Europe for pollinosis induced by grass or ragweed, but not in Japan. As a result, the effect of SLIT was proven in the cedar pollinosis in Japan as high level evidence. A whole body immunity induction is thought in the appearance of the effect, and, in addition, it is necessary to be going to be cleared the accurate mechanism of the effect in the future. Moreover, the development of a special SLIT and the import of an overseas product are needed in Japan.

Background: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis is commonly used in Europe, but not in Japan. Although some studies of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis (JCP) were reported, all the subjects were adults. SLIT is an ideal treatment for children rather than for adults, because it overcomes subcutaneous immunotherapy in the complication of painful injections and habitual visits of a hospital. We tried an open pilot study of SLIT for pediatric JCP., Methods: Ten pediatric patients with JCP (4 boys and 6 girls, mean ages; 8.5+/-2.2 years old) were treated according to a scheduled doses of SLIT with a therapeutic standardized Japanese cedar pollen extract. They were maintained at the doses of 2000JAU of allergen once a week during pollen scattering. Clinical efficacies during the pollen scattering in the first season were evaluated from their diary of symptoms and medications, visual analog scale (VAS) of symptoms, and a questionnaire for SLIT., Results: The mean severity scores of nasal and ocular symptoms were low. VAS was also very short. Three of 10 patients had no symptoms without any drugs during the pollen season. Two patients were medicated within 5 days., Conclusions: SLIT was effective for pediatric Japanese cedar pollinosis.

Background: Allergic rhinitis involves inflammation of the nasal passages. The use of nasal steroids is generally very effective in providing significant symptom relief. However, compliance for their use is sometimes poor., Methods: To examine the efficacy of early intervention (before pollen dispersal) with oral cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRA) on pollinosis in patients with allergy to cedar and Japanese cypress pollens, groups of subjects were treated with LTRA or a placebo for 4 weeks at the beginning of the cedar pollen dispersal season. Subsequently, all patients received nasal steroid therapy concomitantly with LTRA throughout the remaining period of the pollen dispersal season. The effects of such early treatment with LTRA on pollinosis were investigated using symptom scores from an allergy diary and quality of life (QOL) scores., Results: Sneezing and nasal congestion scores were significantly lower in the LTRA-pretreated subjects than observed in the placebo-pretreated patients between weeks 4 and 6 and weeks 3 and 5, respectively. QOL scores improved significantly in all domains after concomitant therapy with nasal steroids. The percent improvement in the nasal congestion score after the concomitant therapy was significantly higher in the LTRA group (69%) than in the placebo group (41%)., Conclusion: Significant differences observed in symptoms and in QOL effects between LTRA- and placebo-pretreated patients and the absence of major adverse effects noted in these studies suggest that early intervention with LTRA is beneficial and safe and should be considered in the management of pollinosis-associated allergic rhinitis., (Copyright (C) 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: An artificial exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber), which allows dispersal of a fixed concentration of Japanese cedar (JC) pollen under stable conditions, was constructed. This study was conducted to identify the exposure conditions assuring validity of the clinical tests conducted using this chamber., Methods: Twenty-four adult patients with JC pollinosis were exposed to different concentrations of JC pollen: 0 (only during the summer period), 4,000, 8,000 and 12,000 grains/m3, and the nasal and ocular symptoms were self-assessed during a 4-hour period of exposure. The amount of nasal discharge was measured and the sneezing frequency was recorded. This study was conducted twice during the summer and winter periods, i.e. non-pollen seasons. The reproducibility of the symptoms between the two seasons was assessed., Results: None of the subjects developed any symptom at the pollen concentration of 0 grains/m3. No significant differences in the time to the onset of symptoms were found between the summer and winter study, regardless of the pollen concentration. There were no significant differences between the summer and winter study in the total symptom score and total nasal symptom score at any pollen concentration, suggesting the very favorable reproducibility of symptoms., Conclusions: Efficient and reproducible results are obtained in patients exposed to JC pollen in the OHIO Chamber. The results suggest the conditions of JC pollen exposure have scientific validity and the OHIO Chamber has the potential to contribute significantly to basic and clinical studies of JC pollinosis., (Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollens is a serious problem in Japan. Omalizumab, a humanized monoclonal anti-IgE antibody, improves symptoms associated with SAR, but a study comprehensively investigating the clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacological effects of omalizumab re-treatment has not yet been conducted., Methods: The open-label, 12-week study was carried out in 34 patients who had been treated with omalizumab in the core study conducted in the previous Japanese cedar pollen season. The study plan including study period, efficacy and safety endpoints, as well as dose regimen, was designed to be the same as in the core study. Omalizumab was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on the serum IgE level and body weight of each patient., Results: Time course changes in daily nasal symptom medication scores as well as in daily ocular symptom medication scores throughout the pollen period were comparable with those in the omalizumab group in the core study. Serum free IgE levels decreased to below the target level in all patients and were equal to those in the omalizumab group in the core study. The adverse reaction profiles were similar to those in the core study. In addition, the overall incidence of drug-related adverse events and injection site reactions in the re-treatment study did not increase compared with those in the omalizumab group in the core study. There were no serious adverse events, and no anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected., Conclusion: Omalizumab was effective and safe when consecutively readministered in the second Japanese cedar pollen season.

Fluticasone furoate nasal spray (FFNS) is a novel, enhanced-affinity glucocorticoid administered in a unique side-actuated device for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. No previous clinical studies have compared the efficacy of FFNS with another intranasal steroid. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FFNS, 110 microg/day, once daily with fluticasone propionate nasal spray (FPNS), 200 microg/day, twice daily in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis to support the regulatory filing in Japan. In this multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study, patients (>or=16 years old) were randomized to receive 2 weeks of treatment with FFNS (n = 151), FFNS placebo (n = 72), FPNS (n = 148), or FPNS placebo (n = 75). FFNS once daily was noninferior to FPNS twice daily in mean change from baseline in three total nasal symptom scores (3TNSS; sneezing, rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion; -1.23 +/- 0.140 and -1.06 +/- 0.142, respectively). Compared with placebo, FFNS was superior in reducing 3TNSS (p < 0.001). Both FFNS and FPNS showed similar mean changes from baseline in 4TNSS (3TNSS and nasal itching) and individual nasal symptom scores. The onset of action for FFNS was observed from the 1st day of treatment, whereas in the FPNS group it was observed on the 2nd day. There were similar improvements in rhinoscopy findings, activity of daily life interference, and patient-rated overall evaluation to therapy in the FFNS and FPNS groups. FFNS was well tolerated. Treatment with once-daily FFNS was effective and noninferior to twice-daily FPNS in reducing nasal symptoms. Faster onset of action for FFNS was observed.

Background: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollen is a substantial problem in Japan. Sublingual immuno-therapy (SLIT) is safer than conventional antigen-specific immunotherapy, the only treatment modality by which complete cure of the disease can be expected. We investigated the safety and efficacy of SLIT in the treatment of cedar pollinosis patients compared to placebo., Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 61 cedar pollinosis patients. Increasing doses of standardized Japanese cedar extract or placebo were administered sublingually in intervals ranging from daily to once a week after six weeks. The primary efficacy variable was the mean of the daily total symptom scores (TSS) during the pollen dispersing period. Secondary efficacy variables included the QOL scores and related variables., Results: Primary efficacy variable scores were significantly lower for some days in the SLIT group than in the placebo group (P < .01 or P < .05). Secondary efficacy for the QOL score in SLIT group was almost of half of placebo group. There was no significant difference in the overall incidence of side effects between the SLIT group and the placebo group., Conclusions: SLIT was effective and safe in the treatment of cedar pollinosis.

Background: A pollen exposure chamber (OHIO Chamber) was built in central Tokyo, Japan, in order to study seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR). Since satisfactory outcomes were obtained from the controlled pollen exposure at the chamber, we conducted preliminary studies in volunteers with SAR., Methods: Ten volunteers with SAR sensitive to Japanese cedar (JC) pollen were enrolled in this study. In order to investigate the intranasal and intraocular pollen number, volunteers were initially exposed to a low concentration of JC (2500 grains/m3) for at most 1 hour in this chamber. Before and after the exposure, nasal cavities and eyes were washed with 100ml and 25 ml of saline, respectively. Nasal and eye washing solutions were collected and the number of JC pollen was counted. After 3 hours the volunteers were subsequently exposed to a moderate concentration of JC (4500 grains/m3) for 2 hours. Subjective nasal and ocular symptoms were recorded and the amount of nasal secretion was measured during the allergen exposure periods., Results: During the initial exposure, all volunteers except one stayed in the chamber for 1 hour without any nasal or ocular symptoms. The number of pollen in the nose and eyes was 249.2 +/- 120.9 and 13.6 +/- 13.6 grains, respectively. During the subsequent 2-hour exposure to JC pollen, nasal and ocular symptoms developed gradually in a time dependent manner in all the volunteers except one., Conclusions: This is the first clinical study using Japanese cedar pollen under well-controlled conditions in the OHIO chamber in which the induction of allergic symptoms was observed. The OHIO chamber will be useful for studying allergic rhinitis in Japan.

Background: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) induced by Japanese cedar pollen is a substantial problem in Japan. Omalizumab, a novel humanized monoclonal anti-immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibody, has already been proven to reduce symptoms associated with SAR. We investigated the safety and efficacy of omalizumab in the treatment of patients with Japanese cedar pollen-induced SAR compared to placebo., Methods: A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 100 Japanese patients with a history of moderate-to-severe SAR induced by Japanese cedar pollens. Omalizumab (150, 225, 300, or 375mg) or placebo was administered subcutaneously every 2 or 4 weeks based on serum total IgE and body weight at baseline. The primary efficacy variable was the mean of daily nasal symptom medication scores (sum of the daily nasal symptom severity score and daily nasal rescue medication score) during the treatment period. Secondary efficacy variables included the daily ocular symptom medication score and related variables., Results: Primary and all secondary efficacy variable scores were significantly lower in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group (P < .01). Serum free IgE levels markedly decreased in the omalizumab group and were associated with clinical efficacy. The overall incidence of injection site reactions was higher in the omalizumab group than in the placebo group; however, the adverse reaction profile was similar between the two groups when excluding injection site reactions. No anti-omalizumab antibodies were detected., Conclusions: Omalizumab was effective and safe in the treatment of SAR induced by Japanese cedar pollen.

Background: Epinastine hydrochloride and fexofenadine hydrochloride, the second-generation antihistamines, are largely used in the indication of allergic rhinitis in Japan. The purpose of this study was to compare the protective efficacy of epinastine hydrochloride or fexofenadine hydrochloride using a nasal provocation test with Japanese cedar pollen allergen., Methods: A single-dose, placebo-controlled, single-blind crossover clinical study was conducted in patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis. The pollen exposure was done by the antigen provocation by disc method and involved repeated provocation five times per day., Results: Among the active agents studied-epinastine hydrochloride and fexofenadine hydrochloride-epinastine hydrochloride significantly decreased the number of sneezing attacks and the quantity of nasal discharge for 3 hours after drug administration compared with placebo, a finding supported by the quantity of nasal discharge in the nasal findings. In this study, fexofenadine hydrochloride showed no significant difference compared with placebo., Conclusions: This study demonstrates better protection with epinastine hydrochloride than with fexofenadine hydrochloride or placebo in a nasal provocation test with Japanese cedar pollen allergen.