1. Comparison of chemotherapy alone versus chemotherapy and radiation therapy of extensive small cell carcinoma of the lung.
- Author
-
Wilson HE, Stanley K, Vincent RG, Mountain CF, Sealy R, Cohen M, Chen TY, Batley F, Kilman J, Kakos G, Vasko J, Williams TE, and Tucker RD
- Subjects
- Aged, Body Weight drug effects, Carcinoma, Small Cell radiotherapy, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Leukopenia chemically induced, Lung Neoplasms radiotherapy, Male, Middle Aged, Random Allocation, Thrombocytopenia chemically induced, Carcinoma, Small Cell drug therapy, Cyclophosphamide administration & dosage, Lomustine administration & dosage, Lung Neoplasms drug therapy, Methotrexate administration & dosage, Nitrosourea Compounds administration & dosage
- Abstract
In a randomized study 145 patients with extensive small cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with chemotherapy alone (Cytoxan, CCNU, methotrexate) or with the same drug regimen and with radiation therapy to the brain, chest, and abdomen. One hundred eighteen of these patients were evaluable. Those patients receiving radiation had a better response rate (55% vs 31%, P = .016) but significantly greater toxicity. There was no significant difference in rates of complete response (7% vs 8%) or in survival (median 18.4 vs 15.3 weeks) between the two groups overall. The median survival of those patients with a partial response to therapy was 18 weeks; for those achieving a complete response it was 46 weeks. However, a clear difference in survival comparing responders with non-responders was evident only for patients who were assigned to chemotherapy alone. Partial regressions have little, if any, correlation with improvement in survival. Therapy in this disease must be oriented toward inducing complete response.
- Published
- 1983
- Full Text
- View/download PDF