Search

The safety and efficacy of concentration-controlled use of sirolimus (SRL) and cyclosporine (CsA) followed by CsA minimization (CsAm) or elimination (CsAe) beginning at week 13 was compared in a phase 4, open-label, randomized (1:1) trial of renal transplant recipients enrolled between March 2004 and November 2005. The primary endpoint was renal function, measured at 12 months using the Nankivell formula, in patients remaining on therapy. Though a total enrollment of 140 patients in each group was planned to provide an 80% power to detect a difference in means, only 207 subjects were enrolled in this study. Demographic characteristics were similar between groups, with 98.1% recipients of first grafts, 69.1% from living donors, and 7.2% diabetics. At 12 months, there were no differences in renal function (61.08 vs 65.24 mL/min, P = .132); incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (14.3% vs 22.5%, P = .152); and patient (89.5% vs 92.2%, P = .632), graft (87.6% vs 88.2%, P = .999), and death-censored graft (98.1% vs 94.1%, P = .166) survivals between CsAm and CsAe groups, respectively. There were no differences in the overall rate of study-drug discontinuation (32.4% vs 36.3%, P = .562) but more patients discontinued because of lack of efficacy/graft loss in the CsAe group (4.8% vs 14.7%, P = .018). This study was underpowered to demonstrate the superiority of one regimen over the other. In summary, SRL immunotherapy combined with CsA minimization or elimination showed comparative safety and efficacy. Both regimens offer potential treatment options for de novo renal allograft recipients.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), in combination with cyclosporine and corticosteroids, improves long-term graft survival in renal transplant recipients. However, optimal MMF therapy may be limited by gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance, which may result in the need for MMF dose reduction, interruption, or discontinuation, leading to increased risk of acute rejection. Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) is a new formulation delivering mycophenolic acid developed with the aim of improving upper GI tolerability. A large prospective, open-label, multicenter program (myPROMS: myfortic PROspective Multicenter Study) is underway to determine the efficacy and safety of EC-MPS, in combination with cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA; Neoral) in a large population of de novo and maintenance renal transplant recipients. myPROMS consists of one global protocol with 14 subprotocols. Each subprotocol is designed to address further specific objectives, such as specific patient populations, steroid regimens, and various CsA C2 targets. The preliminary data summarized here are from two subprotocols, which investigated the benefits of converting maintenance renal transplant patients receiving MMF to EC-MPS. The 3-month interim analyses suggest that the conversion from MMF to EC-MPS is well tolerated in maintenance renal transplant recipients.