Search

Background: Cyclosporine (CsA) and tacrolimus (Tac) in heart transplantation (HTx) have been compared but with certain drawbacks. We compared both drugs in a prospective analysis with medium-term follow-up., Methods: Hundred and six patients were randomized to receive CsA or Tac (53 per group). Target levels of CsA were 200-300 ng/mL in the first six months and 100-200 ng/mL thereafter. Tac levels were 10-15 and 5-10 ng/mL, respectively. We also used daclizumab as induction and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroids as maintenance therapy., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar. Survival (CsA 88.7% vs. Tac 81.1%; p = 0.493) was similar. There was a tendency for longer time to first rejection with CsA (93 ± 110 vs. 55 ± 81 d; p = 0.122). There were more rejection-free patients with Tac (39 vs. 28%; p = 0.233). CsA patients suffered more viral infections (0.41 ± 0.58 vs. 0.11 ± 0.31; p = 0.003). CsA patients developed hypertension often (64 vs. 43%; p = 0.032). Tac patients suffered more gastrointestinal complications (16 vs. 6%; p = 0.042). Renal function and the development of diabetes, dyslipidemia, or neurological complications was similar., Conclusions: Tac patients showed a tendency for longer time to first rejection, and there were more rejection-free patients with Tac and suffered fewer viral infections. Tac patients developed less hypertension and needed less drugs for its control. Renal function was similar in both groups., (© 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.)

Background: Pharmacokinetic modeling supports trough monitoring of everolimus, but prospective data comparing this approach versus mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo cardiac transplant recipients are currently unavailable., Methods: In a 12-month multicenter open-label study, cardiac transplant patients received everolimus (trough level 3-8 ng/mL) with reduced cyclosporine A (CsA) or MMF (3 g/day) with standard CsA, both with corticosteroids+/-induction therapy., Results: In total, 176 patients were randomized (everolimus 92, MMF 84). Mean creatinine clearance was 72.5+/-27.9 and 76.8+/-32.1 mL/min at baseline, 65.4+/-24.7 and 72.2+/-26.2 mL/min at month 6, and 68.7+/-27.7 and 71.8+/-29.8 mL/min at month 12 with everolimus and MMF, respectively. The primary endpoint was not met since calculated CrCl at month 6 posttransplant was 6.9 mL/min lower with everolimus, exceeding the predefined margin of 6 mL/min. However, by month 12 the between-group difference had narrowed versus baseline (3.1 mL/min). All efficacy endpoints were noninferior for everolimus versus MMF. The 12-month incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection International Heart and Lung Transplantation grade more than or equal to 3A was 21 of 92 (22.8%) with everolimus and 25 of 84 (29.8%) with MMF. Adverse events were consistent with class effects including less-frequent cytomegalovirus infection with everolimus (4 [4.4%]) than MMF (14 [16.9%], P=0.01)., Conclusion: Concentration-controlled everolimus with reduced CsA results in similar renal function and equivalent efficacy compared with MMF with standard CsA at 12 months after cardiac transplantation.

Aim: Studying the possible influence of SNPs on efficacy and safety of calcineurin inhibitors upon heart transplantation. Materials & methods: In 60 heart transplant patients treated with tacrolimus or cyclosporine, we studied a panel of 36 SNPs correlated with a series of clinical parameters during the first post-transplantation year. Results: The presence of serious infections was correlated to ABCB1 rs1128503 (p = 0.012), CC genotype reduced the probability of infections being also associated with lower blood cyclosporine concentrations. Lower renal function levels were found in patients with rs9282564 AG (p = 0.003), related to higher blood cyclosporine blood levels. A tendency toward increased graft rejection (p = 0.05) was correlated to rs2066844 CC in NOD2/CARD15, a gene related to lymphocyte activation. Conclusion: Pharmacogenetics can help identify patients at increased risk of clinical complications. Original submitted 30 January 2015; revision submitted 27 March 2015 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Delgado JF, Crespo-Leiro MG, Gómez-Sánchez MA, Paniagua MJ, González-Vílchez F, Vázquez de Prada JA, Fernández-Yáñez J, Pascual D, Almenar L, Martínez-Dolz L, Díaz B, Roig E, Segovia J, Arizón JM, Garrido I, Blasco T, López J, Brossa V, Manito N, Muñiz J. Risk factors associated with moderate-to-severe renal dysfunction among heart transplant patients: results from the CAPRI study. Clin Transplant 2010 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2010.01249.x © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. The longer survival of patients with heart transplantation (HT) favors calcineurin inhibitor-related chronic kidney disease (CKD). It behoves to identify risk factors. At 14 Spanish centers, data on 1062 adult patients with HT (age 59.2 ± 12.3 yr, 82.5% men) were collected at routine follow-up examinations. Glomerular filtration rate, GFR, was estimated using the four-variable MDRD equation, and moderate-or-severe renal dysfunction (MSRD) was defined as K/DOQI stage 3 CKD or worse. Time since transplant ranged from one month to 22 yr (mean 6.7 yr). At assessment, 26.6% of patients were diabetic and 63.9% hypertensive; 53.9% were taking cyclosporine and 33.1% tacrolimus; and 61.4% had MSRD. Among patients on cyclosporine or tacrolimus at assessment, multivariate logistic regression identified male sex (OR 0.44), pre- and post-HT creatinine (2.73 and 3.13 per mg/dL), age at transplant (1.06 per yr), time since transplant (1.05 per yr), and tacrolimus (0.65) as independent positive or negative predictors of MSRD. It is concluded that female sex, pre- and one-month post-HT serum creatinine, age at transplant, time since transplant, and immunosuppression with cyclosporine rather than tacrolimus may all be risk factors for development of CKD ≥ stage 3 by patients with HT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mycophenolic acid (MPA) dose reduction is associated with increased risk of rejection and graft loss in renal transplantation. This analysis investigated the impact of MPA dose changes with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in de novo heart transplant recipients. In a 12-month, single-blind trial, 154 patients (EC-MPS, 78; MMF, 76) were randomized to either EC-MPS (1080 mg bid) or MMF (1500 mg bid) in combination with cyclosporine and steroids. The primary efficacy variable was the incidence of treatment failure, comprising a composite of biopsy-proven (BPAR) and treated acute rejection, graft loss or death. Significantly fewer patients receiving EC-MPS required ≥2 dose reductions than patients on MMF (26.9% vs. 42.1% of patients, p = 0.048). Accordingly, the average daily dose of EC-MPS as a percentage of the recommended dose was significantly higher than for MMF (88.4% vs. 79.0%, p = 0.016). Among patients requiring ≥1 dose reduction, the incidence of treated BPAR grade ≥3A was significantly lower with EC-MPS compared with MMF (23.4% vs. 44.0%, p = 0.032). These data suggest that EC-MPS-treated heart transplant patients are less likely to require multiple dose reductions than those on MMF which may be associated with a significantly lower risk of treated BPAR ≥3A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS, myfortic) is an advanced formulation that delays the release of mycophenolic acid (MPA). Its efficacy and safety has been proven in several clinical trials in renal transplantation. Methods: In a single-blind, multicenter trial, a total of 154 de novo heart transplant patients were randomized to either EC-MPS 1,080 mg twice daily or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) 1,500 mg twice daily. Eligible patients included men or women aged 18 to 65 years, undergoing primary heart transplantation, who were treated with cyclosporine microemulsion and corticosteroids as basic immunosuppression. The primary study objective was to investigate the incidence of biopsy-proven and treated acute rejection, graft loss or death (defined as treatment failure) for EC-MPS vs MMF during the first 6 months of treatment in de novo heart transplant recipients. Secondary objectives included assessment of the overall safety and tolerability of EC-MPS vs MMF in the study population. Results: The primary efficacy variable, treatment failure at 6 months, was similar for both treatments: 52.6% for EC-MPS and 57.9% for MMF (2-sided 95% confidence interval [CI]: −21.0% to 10.4%). At 12 months, treatment failure was 57.7% for EC-MPS and 60.5% for MMF (2-sided 95% CI: −18.4 to 12.7), and death and graft loss rate was 5.1% vs 9.2% for EC-MPS and MMF at 12 months, respectively (2-sided 95% CI: −12.2 to 4.1). The overall safety profile was similar for both groups. Significantly more patients on MMF had two or more study medication dose reductions during the treatment period. Conclusions: These 6- and 12-month results show that EC-MPS is therapeutically similar to MMF in de novo heart transplant recipients and has a comparable safety profile. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]