Search

Objective: Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a rare histotype of ovarian cancer with a unique disease course. Little data exist regarding the influence of sociodemographic factors on diagnosis and outcomes in this disease. Our objective was to evaluate the associations between these factors and the clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and survival in LGSC., Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for data between 2004 and 2015 on patients with LGSC. LGSC was inclusive of invasive, grade 1, serous carcinoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. Patient demographics, insurance status, disease characteristics, treatment approach, and survival were evaluated. ANOVA, Chi Square, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression were used in the analysis., Results: 3221 patients with LGSC were evaluated (89.5% White, 6.2% Black; 7.2% Hispanic, 92.8% non-Hispanic). Compared to Whites, Blacks were diagnosed younger (50.4 vs. 55.9 years, p < 0.01), received less chemotherapy (61.8% vs 67.0%, p = 0.04), and had less CA-125 elevation (OR 4.14 [1.26-13.57], p = 0.02). Compared to non-Hispanics, Hispanics were younger (49.5 vs. 55.8 years, p < 0.01) and received less chemotherapy (55% vs 67%, p < 0.001). In contrast to private insurance, government insurance was associated with a higher 30-day mortality (1.5% vs 0.01%, p < 0.001). Race/ethnicity were not predictive of OS, while older age (HR 1.013 [1.002-1.024], p = 0.03), advanced stage (HR 3.09 [2.15-4.43], p < 0.001), and government insurance (HR 2.33 [1.65-3.30], p < 0.001) were all independently associated with worse OS., Conclusions: Significant differences exist in the clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes of LGSC by sociodemographics, with Blacks and Hispanics being diagnosed younger and receiving less chemotherapy. Age, stage, and insurance status were predictive of overall survival., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors of this paper have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In January 2019, a group of basic, translational, and clinical investigators and patient advocates assembled in Miami, Florida, to discuss the current state of the science of low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum-a rare ovarian cancer subtype that may arise de novo or following a diagnosis of serous borderline tumor. The purpose of the conference was to review current knowledge, discuss ongoing research by established researchers, and frame critical questions or issues for future directions. Following presentations and discussions, the primary objective was to initiate future collaborations, uniform database platforms, laboratory studies, and clinical trials to better understand this disease and to advance clinical care outside the boundaries of single academic institutions. This review summarizes the state of the science in five principal categories: epidemiology and patient outcomes, pathology, translational research, patient care and clinical trials, and patients' perspective., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Overall, there are no conflicts of interest with regard to this article (individual COI are disclosed on COI forms)., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Low grade serous ovarian carcinoma is a rare subtype of ovarian cancer with an indolent and chemorefractory course. As such, treatment strategies among practitioners are not uniformly known. The primary objective of this study was to identify differences in practice patterns among physicians who treat low grade serous carcinoma., Methods Materials: A de novo survey was distributed to members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Questions about demographics, management of primary and recurrent disease, and use of consolidation therapy were included. Statistical analyses were performed using χ 2 and Fisher's exact tests., Results: 194 gynecologic oncologists completed the survey. Approximately two-thirds of respondents practiced in a university based setting and treated a high volume of ovarian cancers, including low grade serous carcinoma. 82% recommended somatic testing during treatment and 84% routinely sent patients for genetic counseling. Treatment preferences for primary disease varied by debulking status. 48% of practitioners used hormone antagonism as consolidation after primary treatment. Secondary cytoreduction was preferred for patients with platinum sensitive recurrence and a long disease free interval following primary treatment (P<0.001). Hormone antagonism was the preferred treatment for the first platinum resistant recurrence (54%), while a BRAF inhibitor was the preferred agent in platinum resistant recurrence in the presence of a known BRAF mutation (56%)., Conclusions: There was significant variation in the preferred management of low grade serous carcinoma among practitioners. Further efforts to improve knowledge of this disease, identify optimal treatment modalities, and provide guidelines for management should be encouraged., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© IGCS and ESGO 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objective: To determine the efficacy of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in Stage I uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC)., Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional investigation was performed to identify surgically staged patients with Stage I UPSC who were (1) treated after surgery with 3-6 courses of platinum-based chemotherapy without radiation from 1990-2003, and (2) followed for a minimum of 12 months, or until recurrence., Results: Six patients (IA-2, IB-3, IC-1) were treated with carboplatin (AUC 6) or cisplatin (50 mg/m2) alone. One patient recurred to the vagina, was treated with chemo-radiation, and is alive and well at 122 months. One patient recurred to the lung, liver, and brain, and died of disease at 24 months. The remaining 4 patients are alive with no evidence of disease 15-124 months (mean 62 months) after treatment. Two patients (IB-1, IC-1) were treated with cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (1000 mg/m2), and both are alive and well with no evidence of disease 75 and 168 months after treatment. Twenty-one patients (IA-5, IB-13, IC-3) were treated with a combination of carboplatin (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (135 mg/m2-175 mg/m2). One patient recurred to the vagina after 3 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel, and was treated with chemo-radiation. She is now without evidence of disease 10 months after treatment. At present, all 21 patients with Stage I UPSC treated following surgical staging with carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy are alive and well with no evidence of disease 10-138 months (mean 41 months) after treatment., Conclusion: Combination carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery is effective in the treatment of Stage I UPSC.

Objectives: We hypothesize that differences in the expression of selected tumor suppressor genes, cell surface adhesion molecules, and multidrug resistance glycoproteins could account for some of the reported differences between uterine serous carcinoma (USC) and extrauterine serous carcinomas (ESC), including ovarian and primary peritoneal carcinoma (OSC and PSC, respectively)., Methods: We studied the expression of the following antigens in 20 USCs, 20 OSCs, and 10 PSCs: p53 and mdm-2 (tumor suppressor genes), CD44 and CD44v6 (cell surface adhesion molecules), and the p-glycoprotein (a multidrug resistance protein recognized by two antibodies, C494 and JSB1). We further studied chemotherapeutic drug resistance by examining reports prepared using the Oncotech Extreme Drug Resistance Assay from 24 of the 50 study patients. Clinical data were obtained from medical record review., Results: USC, OSC, and PSC patients were similar with respect to mean age at diagnosis, mean gravidity, mean parity, personal history of breast cancer, percentage treated with chemotherapy, and survival at 3 and 5 years postdiagnosis. Significant clinical differences included a high prevalence of nulliparity in OSC (P = 0.05), a low prevalence of Caucasian race in USC (P = 0.008), a paucity of stage I patients in OSC and PSC (P = 0.03), a high prevalence of familial breast cancer in OSC (P = 0.06), and superior 2-year survival in OSC (P = 0.02). Seventy-five percent of USCs, 52% of OSCs, and 60% of PSCs expressed p53. Five percent of USCs, 19% of OSCs, and 0% of PSCs expressed mdm-2. Forty percent of USCs, 33% of OSCs, and 10% of PSCs expressed CD44. None of the USCs, OSCs, or PSCs expressed CD44v6. Sixty-one percent of USCs and OSCs and 82% of PSCs expressed C494 while 17% of USCs, 19% of OSCs, and 20% of PSCs expressed JSB1. None of these apparent differences was statistically significant. USC, OSC, and PSCs patients did not demonstrate significant differences with respect to extreme drug resistance. However, the following trends were noted (P = 0.06): more prevalent low drug resistance for cyclophosphamide in OSC compared with USC and more prevalent extreme drug resistance for etoposide in OSC compared with USC., Conclusions: Therefore, despite significant clincial differences, the USCs and ESCs in our series do not differ significantly with respect to the expression of the tumor suppressor genes, cell surface adhesion molecules, and drug resistance proteins studied. It is premature, however, to recommend that USCs and ESCs should be treated identically., (Copyright 2000 Academic Press.)