Search

Water molecules play a key role in all biochemical processes. They help define the shape of proteins, and they are reactant or product in many reactions and are released as ligands are bound. They facilitate the transfer of protons through transmembrane proton channel, pump and transporter proteins. Continuum electrostatics (CE) force fields used by program Multiconformation CE (MCCE) capture electrostatic interactions in biomolecules with an implicit solvent, which captures the averaged solvent water equilibrium properties. Hybrid CE methods can use explicit water molecules within the protein surrounded by implicit solvent. These hybrid methods permit the study of explicit hydrogen bond networks within the protein and allow analysis of processes such as proton transfer reactions. Yet hybrid CE methods have not been rigorously tested. Here, we present an explicit treatment of water molecules in the Gramicidin A (gA) channel using MCCE and compare the resulting distributions of water molecules and key hydration features against those obtained with explicit solvent Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations with the nonpolarizable CHARMM36 and polarizable Drude force fields. CHARMM36 leads to an aligned water wire in the channel characterized by a large absolute net water dipole moment; the MCCE and Drude analysis lead to a small net dipole moment as the water molecules change orientation within the channel. The correct orientation is not as yet known, so these calculations identify an open question. • Water is the primary cellular solvent, yet is challenging to simulate computationally. Here we simulate water molecules in the Gramicidin A channel comparing Monte Carlo (MC) sampling with a continuum electrostatics and Molecular Dynamics (MD) calculations with the non-polarizable CHARMM36 and polarizable Drude force fields. • These give different water properties, with classical MD yielding well oriented water wires, while the Drude or continuum electrostatics force fields lead to more disordered water molecules, often changing orientation in the middle of the channel. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Photosystem II (PSII) uses water as the terminal electron donor, producing oxygen in the Mn4CaO5 oxygen evolving complex (OEC), while cytochrome c oxidase (CcO) reduces O2 to water in its heme–Cu binuclear center (BNC). Each protein is oriented in the membrane to add to the proton gradient. The OEC, which releases protons, is located near the P-side (positive, at low-pH) of the membrane. In contrast, the BNC is in the middle of CcO, so the protons needed for O2 reduction must be transferred from the N-side (negative, at high pH). In addition, CcO pumps protons from N- to P-side, coupled to the O2 reduction chemistry, to store additional energy. Thus, proton transfers are directly coupled to the OEC and BNC redox chemistry, as well as needed for CcO proton pumping. The simulations that study the changes in proton affinity of the redox active sites and the surrounding protein at different states of the reaction cycle, as well as the changes in hydration that modulate proton transfer paths, are described. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cytochrome c Oxidase (CcO) is the terminal electron acceptor in aerobic respiratory chain, reducing O 2 to water. The released free energy is stored by pumping protons through the protein, maintaining the transmembrane electrochemical gradient. Protons are held transiently in a proton loading site (PLS) that binds and releases protons driven by the electron transfer reaction cycle. Multi-Conformation Continuum Electrostatics (MCCE) was applied to crystal structures and Molecular Dynamics snapshots of the B-type Thermus thermophilus CcO. Six residues are identified as the PLS, binding and releasing protons as the charges on heme b and the binuclear center are changed: the heme a 3 propionic acids, Asp287, Asp372, His376 and Glu126B. The unloaded state has one proton and the loaded state two protons on these six residues. Different input structures, modifying the PLS conformation, show different proton distributions and result in different proton pumping behaviors. One loaded and one unloaded protonation states have the loaded/unloaded states close in energy so the PLS binds and releases a proton through the reaction cycle. The alternative proton distributions have state energies too far apart to be shifted by the electron transfers so are locked in loaded or unloaded states. Here the protein can use active states to load and unload protons, but has nearby trapped states, which stabilize PLS protonation state, providing new ideas about the CcO proton pumping mechanism. The distance between the PLS residues Asp287 and His376 correlates with the energy difference between loaded and unloaded states. • Six closely coupled residues form the proton loading sites of B-type CcO. • The unloaded state has one proton and the loaded state two protons on these six residues. • Different structures show different proton pumping behaviors and favor different proton locations. • A tautomer-shift both in the loaded and unloaded states moves CcO between an inactivated, locked and an active, proton loading/unloading states. • A shorter distance between Asp287 and His376, at the P-side of the PLS cluster yields a PLS with a larger proton affinity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]