Search

Our objective was to identify the cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes that metabolise pioglitazone and to examine the effects of the CYP2C8 inhibitors montelukast, zafirlukast, trimethoprim and gemfibrozil on pioglitazone metabolism in vitro. The effect of different CYP isoform inhibitors on the elimination of a clinically relevant concentration of pioglitazone (1 μM) and the formation of the main primary metabolite M-IV were studied using pooled human liver microsomes. The metabolism of pioglitazone by CYP1A2, CYP2B6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 was investigated using human recombinant CYP isoforms. In particular, the inhibitors of CYP2C8, but also those of CYP3A4, markedly inhibited the elimination of pioglitazone and the formation of M-IV by HLM. Inhibitors selective to other CYP isoforms had a minor effect only. Of the recombinant isoforms, CYP2C8 (20 pmol/ml) metabolised pioglitazone markedly (56% in 60 min.), and also CYP3A4 had a significant effect (37% in 60 min.). Montelukast, zafirlukast, trimethoprim and gemfibrozil inhibited pioglitazone elimination in HLM with IC50 values of 0.51 μM, 1.0 μM, 99 μM and 98 μM, respectively, and the formation of the metabolite M-IV with IC50 values of 0.18 μM, 0.78 μM, 71 μM and 59 μM, respectively. In conclusion, pioglitazone is metabolised mainly by CYP2C8 and to a lesser extent by CYP3A4 in vitro. CYP2C9 is not significantly involved in the elimination of pioglitazone. The effect of different CYP2C8 inhibitors on pioglitazone pharmacokinetics needs to be evaluated also in vivo because, irrespective of their in vitro CYP2C8 inhibitory potency, their pharmacokinetic properties may affect the extent of interaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Pioglitazone, a thiazolidinedione anti-diabetic, inhibits cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8 and CYP3A4 enzymes in vitro. Repaglinide, a meglitinide analogue antidiabetic, is metabolised by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4. In patients with type 2 diabetes, the pioglitazone-repaglinide combination has acted synergistically on glycaemic parameters. Our aim was to determine whether pioglitazone increases the plasma concentrations of repaglinide. Methods: In a randomized, 2-phase cross-over study, 12 healthy volunteers received 30 mg pioglitazone or placebo once daily for 5 days. On day 5, they ingested a single 0.25 mg dose of repaglinide 1 h after the last pretreatment dose. Plasma repaglinide and pioglitazone, and blood glucose concentrations were measured for 12 h. Results: During the pioglitazone phase, the mean peak plasma repaglinide concentration (Cmax) and the total area under the concentration-time curve [AUC(0-∞)] of repaglinide were 100% (range 53–157%, P=0.99) and 90% (range 63–120%, P=0.22), respectively, of those during the placebo phase. Also the half-life of repaglinide was unaffected, but the median peak time of repaglinide was shortened from 40 min to 20 min by pioglitazone (P=0.014). The short-term pioglitazone administration did not modify the blood glucose-lowering effect of a single dose of repaglinide. Conclusions: Pioglitazone does not increase the plasma concentrations of repaglinide, indicating that the inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 is very weak in vivo, probably due to its extensive plasma protein binding. The synergistic effect of repaglinide and pioglitazone on the glycaemic parameters, seen in patients with type 2 diabetes during their long-term use, is unlikely to be caused by inhibition of repaglinide metabolism by pioglitazone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]