1. Five-year retrospective review in gynecologic cytopathology: is it time to amend?
- Author
-
Nomani L, Abro S, Chatt G, Abdulameer S, Pambuccian SE, Mehrotra S, and Barkan GA
- Subjects
- Female, Humans, Mandatory Reporting, Papillomavirus Infections diagnosis, Papillomavirus Infections pathology, Quality Indicators, Health Care, Retrospective Studies, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions pathology, Cytological Techniques methods, Cytological Techniques standards, Papanicolaou Test methods, Papanicolaou Test standards, Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions diagnosis
- Abstract
Introduction: According to the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments 1988 regulations, 5-year retrospective review (5YRR) of normal Papanicolaou tests in patients with a newly diagnosed high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or above (HSIL+) is mandatory. Since this mandate has been in place, a multitude of changes have taken place in the screening and management guidelines of cervical cancer. The aim of this study is to assess the role of this mandate in our laboratory and to investigate the lessons learned., Material and Methods: The cytopathology electronic database and institutional quality assurance records at Loyola University Medical Center were searched from January 2009 to December 2019 to identify all Papanicolaou tests diagnosed as new "HSIL and above" (HSIL+). Major discrepancy (2+) was defined as initial negative diagnosis changed to HSIL+., Results: A total of 153,083 Papanicolaou tests were performed during this period; out of these, 1452 (0.94%) were diagnosed as HSIL+. A total of 695 HSIL+ Papanicolaou tests had a negative prior Papanicolaou and in 615 of 695 there was agreement with the initial negative diagnosis. In 61 Papanicolaou tests, the initial diagnosis was changed from negative and they were reclassified on review as 3 HSIL, 9 ASC-H, 7 AGC, and 42 ASCUS or LSIL. Major discrepancy rate was calculated as 3 of 695 (0.43%). None required an amended report., Conclusions: It is important to revisit the 5YRR as a method of implementing the quality indicators in gynecologic cytology so that the process retains its value without overburdening cytology laboratories and personnel., (Copyright © 2021 American Society of Cytopathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF