Search

Stress granules and P-bodies are cytosolic biomolecular condensates that dynamically form by the phase separation of RNAs and proteins. They participate in translational control and buffer the proteome. Upon stress, global translation halts and mRNAs bound to the translational machinery and other proteins coalesce to form stress granules (SGs). Similarly, translationally stalled mRNAs devoid of translation initiation factors shuttle to P-bodies (PBs). Here, we review the cumulative progress made in defining the protein components that associate with mammalian SGs and PBs. We discuss the composition of SG and PB proteomes, supported by a new user-friendly database (http://rnagranuledb.lunenfeld.ca/) that curates current literature evidence for genes or proteins associated with SGs or PBs. As previously observed, the SG and PB proteomes are biased toward intrinsically disordered regions and have a high propensity to contain primary sequence features favoring phase separation. We also provide an outlook on how the various components of SGs and PBs may cooperate to organize and form membraneless organelles., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Activity-dependent translation requires the transport of mRNAs within membraneless protein assemblies known as neuronal granules from the cell body toward synaptic regions. Translation of mRNA is inhibited in these granules during transport but quickly activated in response to neuronal stimuli at the synapse. This raises an important question: how does synaptic activity trigger translation of once-silenced mRNAs? Here, we demonstrate a strong connection between phase separation, the process underlying the formation of many different types of cellular granules, and in vitro inhibition of translation. By using the Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP), an abundant neuronal granule component and translational repressor, we show that FMRP phase separates in vitro with RNA into liquid droplets mediated by its C-terminal low-complexity disordered region (i.e., FMRP LCR ). FMRP LCR posttranslational modifications by phosphorylation and methylation have opposing effects on in vitro translational regulation, which corroborates well with their critical concentrations for phase separation. Our results, combined with bioinformatics evidence, are supportive of phase separation as a general mechanism controlling activity-dependent translation., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: J.D.F-K. and R.W.K. were coauthors on a 2016 review article. J.D.F-K., R.W.K., and G.S. were coeditors of a 2018 special issue of the Journal of Molecular Biology, and they coauthored an introduction to the issue.