Search

Background The Surveillance and Treatment of Prisoners With Hepatitis C (SToP-C) study demonstrated that scaling up of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment reduced hepatitis C virus (HCV) transmission. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of scaling up HCV treatment in statewide prison services incorporating long-term outcomes across custodial and community settings. Methods A dynamic model of incarceration and HCV transmission among people who inject drugs (PWID) in New South Wales, Australia, was extended to include former PWID and those with long-term HCV progression. Using Australian costing data, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of scaling up HCV treatment in prisons by 44% (as achieved by the SToP-C study) for 10 years (2021–2030) before reducing to baseline levels, compared to a status quo scenario. The mean incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated by comparing the differences in costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) between the scale-up and status quo scenarios over 40 years (2021–2060) discounted at 5% per annum. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Scaling up HCV treatment in the statewide prison service is projected to be cost-effective with a mean ICER of A$12 968/QALY gained. The base-case scenario gains 275 QALYs over 40 years at a net incremental cost of A$3.6 million. Excluding DAA pharmaceutical costs, the mean ICER is reduced to A$6 054/QALY. At the willingness-to-pay threshold of A$50 000/QALY, 100% of simulations are cost-effective at various discount rates, time horizons, and changes of treatment levels in prison and community. Conclusions Scaling up HCV testing and treatment in prisons is highly cost-effective and should be considered a priority in the national elimination strategy. Clinical Trials Registration NCT02064049. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: New technologies and therapies allow the possibility of a single-visit test and treat model for hepatitis C virus (HCV), addressing some of the barriers to care faced by people who inject drugs. Methods: The TEMPO Pilot Study was an interventional cohort study evaluating a single-visit test and treat intervention among people with recent injecting drug use at a one peer-led needle and syringe program (NSP) in Sydney, Australia between September 2019 and February 2021. This analysis evaluated awareness of HCV status and agreement of self-report with HCV RNA test results. The analysis also assessed acceptability of: modality of result delivery, modality of blood sampling, site of treatment, and duration of treatment. Results: Among 101 participants (median age 43; 31% female), 100 had a valid HCV RNA test result and 27% (27/100) were HCV RNA detectable. Overall, 65% (65/100) were aware of their status. Among people with a positive HCV RNA result, 48% (13/27) were aware of their status. People preferred same-day HCV test results (95%, 96/101), and preferred to receive results in person (69%, 70/101). Receiving treatment at an NSP was acceptable (100%, 101/101) and 78% (79/101) were willing to discuss their health with a peer NSP worker. Conclusion: Half of people with current HCV infection were aware of their status. The high acceptability of simplified testing and treatment pathways delivered at NSPs indicates that this is an appropriate strategy to improve HCV awareness and treatment uptake in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background In many settings, recent or prior injection drug use remains a barrier to accessing direct-acting antiviral treatment (DAA) for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We examined patterns of drug and alcohol use and injection equipment sharing among people with recent injecting drug use or receiving opioid agonist treatment (OAT) during and following DAA-based treatment. Methods SIMPLIFY and D3FEAT are phase 4 trials evaluating the efficacy of DAA among people with past 6-month injecting drug use or receiving OAT through a network of 25 international sites. Enrolled in 2016–2017, participants received sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SIMPLIFY) or paritaprevir/ritonavir/dasabuvir/ombitasvir ± ribavirin (D3FEAT) for 12 weeks and completed behavioral questionnaires before, during, and up to 2 years posttreatment. The impact of time in HCV treatment and follow-up on longitudinally measured longitudinally measured behaviors was estimated using generalized estimating equations. Results At screening, of 190 participants (mean age, 47 years; 74% male), 62% reported any past-month injecting 16% past-month injection equipment sharing, and 61% current OAT. Median alcohol use was 2 (Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test–Consumption; range, 1–12). During follow-up, opioid injecting (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92–0.99) and sharing (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80–0.94) decreased, whereas no significant changes were observed for stimulant injecting (OR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.94–1.02) or alcohol use (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95–1.04). Conclusions Injecting drug use and risk behaviors remained stable or decreased following DAA-based HCV treatment. Findings further support expanding HCV treatment to all, irrespective of injection drug use. Clinical Trials Registration SIMPLIFY, NCT02336139; D3FEAT, NCT02498015. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

HCV reinfection following successful treatment can compromise treatment outcomes. This systematic review assessed the rate of HCV reinfection following treatment among people with recent drug use and those receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT). We searched bibliographic databases and conference abstracts for studies assessing post-treatment HCV reinfection rates among people with recent drug use (injecting or non-injecting) or those receiving OAT. Meta-analysis was used to cumulate reinfection rates and meta-regression was used to explore heterogeneity across studies. Thirty-six studies were included (6,311 person-years of follow-up). The overall rate of HCV reinfection was 5.9/100 person-years (95% CI 4.1–8.5) among people with recent drug use (injecting or non-injecting), 6.2/100 person-years (95% CI 4.3–9.0) among people recently injecting drugs, and 3.8/100 person-years (95% CI 2.5–5.8) among those receiving OAT. Reinfection rates were comparable following interferon-based (5.4/100 person-years; 95% CI 3.1–9.5) and direct-acting antiviral (3.9/100 person-years; 95% CI 2.5–5.9) therapy. In stratified analysis, reinfection rates were 1.4/100 person-years (95% CI 0.8–2.6) among people receiving OAT with no recent drug use, 5.9/100 person-years (95% CI 4.0–8.6) among people receiving OAT with recent drug use, and 6.6/100 person-years (95% CI 3.4–12.7) among people with recent drug use not receiving OAT. In meta-regression analysis, longer follow-up was associated with lower reinfection rate (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] per year increase in mean/median follow-up 0.77; 95% CI 0.69–0.86). Compared with people receiving OAT with no recent drug use, those with recent drug use receiving OAT (aRR 3.50; 95% CI 1.62–7.53), and those with recent drug use not receiving OAT (aRR 3.96; 95% CI 1.82–8.59) had higher reinfection rates. HCV reinfection risk following treatment was higher among people with recent drug use and lower among those receiving OAT. The lower rates of reinfection observed in studies with longer follow-up suggested higher reinfection risk early post-treatment. Our findings demonstrate that although reinfection by hepatitis C virus occurs following successful treatment in people with recent drug use, the rate of hepatitis C reinfection is lower than the rates of primary infection reported in the literature for this population – reinfection should not be used as a reason to withhold therapy from people with ongoing injecting drug use. The rate of hepatitis C reinfection was lowest among people receiving opioid agonist therapy with no recent drug use. These data illustrate that harm reduction services are required to reduce the reinfection risk, while regular post-treatment hepatitis C assessment is required for early detection and retreatment. • We assessed the rate of HCV reinfection after treatment among people who recently used drugs and those receiving opioid agonist therapy. • The rate of reinfection was lowest among people receiving opioid agonist therapy with no recent drug use. • The rate of HCV reinfection was comparable after interferon therapy or direct-acting antiviral therapy. • A higher rate of HCV reinfection was observed in studies with shorter follow-up. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) has been shown to be effective among PWID, but more real-world data on treatment outcomes is needed. The aim of this analysis was to assess the efficacy of DAA therapy, and the rate of reinfection and mortality among people attending an inner-city community health centre in Victoria, Canada.Methods: In this retrospective study, patients treated with DAA therapy between November 2014 and Dec 31, 2017 were included. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess recent injecting drug use (IDU, previous six months) or receipt of opioid agonist treatment (OAT). The primary endpoint was Sustained Virologic Response (SVR12). Secondary endpoints included HCV reinfection and mortality.Results: Of 270 patients who initiated DAA treatment (31% female), 20% (n=54) had HIV/HCV coinfection, 32% (n=84) had cirrhosis, 67% (n=181) had genotype 1, 6% (n=15) had genotype 2, 26% (n=69) had genotype 3. 46% (n=125) of patients were receiving OAT and 49% (n=132) reported recent IDU. 98% (n=265) completed treatment; two people stopped due to mental health, two people died, and one was non-adherent. 92% (249 of 270) achieved SVR12. 16 patients with End of Treatment (EOT) response did not have a SVR12; 7 were lost to follow-up; 2 people refused bloodwork; 2 people died; 1 had reinfection; and 4 had viral relapse. There was no difference in SVR12 by OAT (OAT, 93% vs. no OAT, 91%, P=0.435), recent injecting drug use (yes, 92% vs. no, 92%, P=0.904), or HIV status (HIV, 92% vs. no HIV, 94%, P=0.498). Eight cases of HCV reinfection were observed over 253 person-years of follow up (3.2 cases per 100 person-years; 95% CI 1.6-6.3). Twenty people died (6.3 per 100 person-years; 95% CI 3.9-10.3), including two during therapy (drug overdose, n=2) and 18 following therapy completion (drug overdose, n=7).Conclusion: This study demonstrates that DAA treatment is effective among a marginalized population receiving care in an inner-city community health centre. The high mortality in this study highlights the importance of integrating HCV care within a framework addressing drug-related harms, preventing overdose mortality, addressing social inequalities, and improving the health of PWID. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Studies of HCV reinfection following direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy among PWID have been limited by short follow-up and small case numbers. This study evaluated the incidence of HCV reinfection following successful DAA therapy among people attending an inner-city community health centre in Victoria, Canada.Methods: In this observational study, participants treated with DAA therapy between November 2014 and December 31, 2019 were included. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess demographics, recent injecting drug use at treatment initiation (previous six months), opioid agonist treatment (OAT), and HIV. Endpoints included sustained virologic response (SVR), HCV reinfection, and mortality.Results: Of 482 participants initiating DAA treatment, 30% were female, 46% were receiving OAT, 49% had recent injection drug use, 15% had HIV/HCV coinfection, and 22% had cirrhosis. Treatment completion was 97% (468/482; 12 discontinued therapy, and 2 died during treatment). SVR was 87% (418/482). Outcomes among those who completed treatment but did not achieve SVR (n=53), included loss to follow-up (n=11), HCV RNA for SVR testing not completed (n=18), viral relapse (n=6), reinfection (n=5) and viral recurrence (n=5, unable to distinguish viral relapse from reinfection), and death (n=7). The rate of HCV reinfection was 3.6/100 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.4-5.5; 22 cases; 602 person-years follow-up). Factors associated with an increased risk of HCV reinfection included recent injection drug use (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 8.55, 95% CI 1.98-36.96) and HIV co-infection (aRR 2.35, 95% CI 1.01-5.44). Fifty-five people died (overdose, n=19) during (n=2) or following (n=53) therapy (7.4/100 person-years; 95% CI 5.6-9.6).Conclusion: This study demonstrates ongoing reinfection among a marginalized population at an inner-city community health centre, with higher rates among those with HIV and recent injecting drug use. The rates of reinfection and mortality highlight the importance of integrating HCV care with strategies to address drug-related harms. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Direct-acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is safe and effective, but there are little data among people who have recently injected drugs. This study evaluated the efficacy, and safety of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for chronic HCV genotype (G) 1 among people with recent injecting drug use and/or receiving OST.Methods: D3FEAT is an international open-label study that recruited treatment-naïve participants with recent injecting drug use (previous 6 months) and/or receiving OST with chronic HCV G1 infection between June 2016 and February 2017 in seven countries. Participants received paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir with (G1a) or without ribavirin (G1b) administered twice daily in a one-week electronic blister pack (records timing of each dose) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was undetectable HCV RNA 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12).Results: Among 87 participants (median age 48 years), 23% were female, 8% had cirrhosis, and 90% had G1a. Overall, 71% were receiving OST, 61% injected in the previous six months, 45% injected in the previous month, and 15% injected > daily. Treatment completion was 97% (84 of 87). There were no virological breakthroughs, but three discontinuations (loss to follow-up, n = 1; non-adherence, n = 1; incarceration, n = 1). SVR was 91% (79 of 87, 95% CI, 83%-96%). Five participants who completed treatment did not have SVR (loss to follow-up, n = 1; death, n = 1; virologic relapse, n = 3). Drug use prior to and during treatment did not impact SVR12. Treatment-related adverse events were observed in 46 (53%) patients (six grade 3, no grade 4). Five (6%) patients had at least one serious adverse event (two possibly/probably related to therapy; nausea and myoclonus). Two cases of reinfection were observed.Conclusion: Paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, and dasabuvir with or without ribavirin for 12 weeks is effective among people with HCV genotype 1 with recent injecting drug use and/or receiving OST. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]