Search

Purpose: To evaluate the improvement in epiphora and need for surgical revision in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction following balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with chitosan-based dressing versus bioresorbable polyurethane packing versus no packing., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients seen from 2015 to 2018 with follow-up evaluation of epiphora at least 3 months after balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Patients with a history of prior punctoplasty, septoplasty, sinus surgery, or dacryocystorhinostomy of any kind were excluded. Those meeting criteria were stratified by postoperative hemostatic intervention: no packing, bioresorbable packing, and chitosan-based dressing (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Procedural outcomes were graded as successes or failures based on subjective report and anatomical findings at most recent visit within an 18-month postoperative window. Instances of recommendation for revision surgery were also recorded., Results: Forty-three cases (36 patients) met the abovementioned criteria. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 12, 17, and 14 cases each, respectively. Average patient age was 55.3 years old, and average duration of follow-up was 6.7 months. Significant variation in outcomes was detected across the 3 groups ( P = .0495), particularly between groups 1 and 3 ( P = .033). Use of chitosan-based dressing trended toward reduced rates of recommendation for surgical revision ( P = .203, P = .113)., Conclusions: Use of chitosan-based dressing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was associated with improved subjective and anatomical outcomes. It may also contribute to less frequent need for revision surgery. Further study in a larger prospective trial is recommended.

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the association between early post-operative improvement in tearing and the long-term success rate of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (eDCR)., Methods: A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent eDCR and were followed up for at least 6 months at our institution from January 2010 to December 2017 was performed., Results: 47 cases(39 patients) of eDCR met the inclusion and exclusion criteria during this time period. Mean follow up after the surgery was 12.5 ± 8 months. In 45 out of 47 (96%) cases post-operative improvement in epiphora within 2 weeks of surgery, or lack thereof, correlated with long-term success or failure of the procedure. There were only 2 cases in which the patients felt improvement in tearing at the initial post-operative visit and the tearing recurred in the late post-operative period (>6 months)., Conclusions: There is a strong association between the early initial post-operative assessment of tearing resolution and the long-term result of eDCR., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To characterize the pre- and post-operative findings in patients undergoing endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (eDCR) performed jointly by ophthalmologists and otolaryngologists., Methods: Retrospective case series consisting of all the patients who underwent eDCR for nasolacrimal duct obstruction at New York Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical College between the 2009-2012 academic years. Patients were followed post-operatively for at least six months. The primary endpoint assessed in this study was symptom recurrence (epiphora)., Results: A total of 20 patients (25 total cases) underwent eDCR within the study interval. Of the 25 cases, 7 (28.0%) represented reoperations due to recurrent symptoms. All 20 patients in the study exhibited sinus pathology, as determined during a pre-operative otolaryngology assessment. As a result, 16 of these patients (80.0%) underwent concurrent sinonasal surgery at the time of eDCR. The success rate in cases without prior DCR was 83.3% (15/18). Only 57.1% of revision cases (4/7) reported resolution of epiphora following surgery., Conclusion: While a joint approach to eDCR did not appear to significantly improve efficacy, it offered the advantage of having an otolaryngologist assess and treat concurrent sinonasal pathology, which was seen in every patient in our series. Given our findings, as well as the technical difficulty often associated with the procedure, there may be great utility in performing eDCR in conjunction with an otolaryngologist.

Purpose: To evaluate the improvement in epiphora and need for surgical revision in patients with acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction following balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with chitosan-based dressing versus bioresorbable polyurethane packing versus no packing. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective study of consecutive adult patients seen from 2015 to 2018 with follow-up evaluation of epiphora at least 3 months after balloon-assisted, middle meatal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy. Patients with a history of prior punctoplasty, septoplasty, sinus surgery, or dacryocystorhinostomy of any kind were excluded. Those meeting criteria were stratified by postoperative hemostatic intervention: no packing, bioresorbable packing, and chitosan-based dressing (groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Procedural outcomes were graded as successes or failures based on subjective report and anatomical findings at most recent visit within an 18-month postoperative window. Instances of recommendation for revision surgery were also recorded. Results: Forty-three cases (36 patients) met the abovementioned criteria. Groups 1, 2, and 3 comprised 12, 17, and 14 cases each, respectively. Average patient age was 55.3 years old, and average duration of follow-up was 6.7 months. Significant variation in outcomes was detected across the 3 groups (P =.0495), particularly between groups 1 and 3 (P =.033). Use of chitosan-based dressing trended toward reduced rates of recommendation for surgical revision (P =.203, P =.113). Conclusions: Use of chitosan-based dressing after endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy was associated with improved subjective and anatomical outcomes. It may also contribute to less frequent need for revision surgery. Further study in a larger prospective trial is recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]