Search

The cost benefits of herd genotyping and the benefits of using sexed semen have been affected by recent improvements in sexing technologies, incorporation of direct health traits in the German total merit index for Holstein cattle, deteriorating prices for purebred heifer calves and bull calves, and introduction of herd genotyping programs. Inseminating genetically superior dams with female-sexed Holstein semen increases the mean breeding value of heifer calves and can produce more Holstein heifer calves than are needed for replacement. This provides an opportunity to increase the selection response in health and production traits at the farm level. A deterministic model is introduced that predicts the increase or decrease in net profit when a farmer takes part in a herd genotyping program and follows a certain insemination strategy. The types of semen allocated to cows and heifers may be sexed or unsexed and Holstein or beef breed. Genetically superior heifers and cows are inseminated with female-sexed Holstein semen, intermediate dams with unsexed Holstein semen, and genetically inferior dams with unsexed or male-sexed beef breed semen. In general, participating in a herd genotyping program is beneficial for German Holstein breeders. The optimum proportions of cows and heifers that should be inseminated with a certain type of semen are sensitive to farm-specific peculiarities. A small price difference between crossbred bull calves and crossbred heifer calves often makes the use of male-sexed beef breed semen uneconomic. Under the conditions considered, it was found to be advantageous to inseminate approximately 50% of heifers and 10% of cows with the highest genetic merit with female-sexed Holstein semen. The optimum proportion of cows that should be inseminated with unsexed beef breed semen was found to be approximately 40%. In a herd with a low replacement rate, the selected heifers can exhibit their genetic superiority over a longer period of time, and a larger proportion of cows can be inseminated with beef breed semen. Participation in a herd genotyping program is, therefore, particularly beneficial for herds with low replacement rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic analyses commonly explore the additive genetic variance of traits. The non‐additive variance, however, is usually small but often significant in dairy cattle. This study aimed at dissecting the genetic variance of eight health traits that recently entered the total merit index in Germany and the somatic cell score (SCS), as well as four milk production traits by analysing additive and dominance variance components. The heritabilities were low for all health traits (between 0.033 for mastitis and 0.099 for SCS), and moderate for the milk production traits (between 0.261 for milk energy yield and 0.351 for milk yield). For all traits, the contribution of dominance variance to the phenotypic variance was low, varying between 0.018 for ovarian cysts and 0.078 for milk yield. Inbreeding depression, inferred from the SNP‐based observed homozygosity, was significant only for the milk production traits. The contribution of dominance variance to the genetic variance was larger for the health traits, ranging from 0.233 for ovarian cysts to 0.551 for mastitis, encouraging further studies that aim at discovering QTLs based on their additive and dominance effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Many local dairy cattle breeds are facing genetic extinction due to a large proportion of foreign genes, which have been introgressed in the past. In addition, the performance gap to popular high‐yielding breeds is increasing, resulting in a risk of numeric extinction. In the present simulation study, a genomic rotational crossbreeding scheme with the high‐yielding German Holstein breed and the numerically small German Angler breed was analysed with the aim to utilize heterosis effects in the crossbred animals. Simultaneously inbreeding was controlled, and the amount of Holstein introgression observed in the Angler breed was reduced. Different scenarios of implementing OCS methods for Angler individuals were evaluated, which differed in their restrictions regarding kinship, native kinship, as well as the amount of genetic contributions from German Holstein. The results showed that rotational crossbreeding can result in superior crossbred offspring compared to the purebred parental lines, whereby OCS methods can simultaneously restrict the increase in inbreeding and keep the Holstein contributions at their current level. However, reducing the amount of migrant contributions while restricting the increase in the native kinship in Angler turned out to be a costly restriction. The reason was that Angler with low genetic contributions from Holsteins tended to have similar Angler ancestors. Consequently, reducing Holstein contributions would considerably increase the native kinship in Angler if it were not constrained. The constraint on the native kinship made a constraint on the conventional kinship superfluous and caused it to increase at a much lower rate than envisaged. This led to both, a high genetic diversity and a low genetic gain. The high genetic diversity in Angler also resulted in lower and oscillating heterosis effects in the crossbred animals. Thus, the reduction of migrant contribution did not increase heterosis effects in the crossbred offspring, and did not result in superior crossbred offspring in general. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, genomic prediction in cattle is largely based on panels of about 54k single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). However with the decreasing costs of and current advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, whole-genome sequence (WGS) data on large numbers of individuals is within reach. Availability of such data provides new opportunities for genomic selection, which need to be explored. Methods: This simulation study investigated how much predictive ability is gained by using WGS data under scenarios with QTL (quantitative trait loci) densities ranging from 45 to 132 QTL/Morgan and heritabilities ranging from 0.07 to 0.30, compared to different SNP densities, with emphasis on divergent dairy cattle breeds with small populations. The relative performances of best linear unbiased prediction (SNP-BLUP) and of a variable selection method with a mixture of two normal distributions (MixP) were also evaluated. Genomic predictions were based on within- population, across-population, and multi-breed reference populations. Results: The use of WGS data for within-population predictions resulted in small to large increases in accuracy for low to moderately heritable traits. Depending on heritability of the trait, and on SNP and QTL densities, accuracy increased by up to 31 %. The advantage of WGS data was more pronounced (7 to 92 % increase in accuracy depending on trait heritability, SNP and QTL densities, and time of divergence between populations) with a combined reference population and when using MixP . While MixP outperformed SNP-BLUP at 45 QTL/Morgan, SNP-BLUP was as good as MixP when QTL density increased to 132 QTL/Morgan. Conclusions: Our results show that, genomic predictions in numerically small cattle populations would benefit from a combination of WGS data, a multi-breed reference population, and a variable selection method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Genomic selection has become a standard tool in dairy cattle breeding. However, for other animal species, implementation of this technology is hindered by the high cost of genotyping. One way to reduce the routine costs is to genotype selection candidates with an SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism) panel of reduced density. This strategy is investigated in the present paper. Methods are proposed for the approximation of SNP positions, for selection of SNPs to be included in the low-density panel, for genotype imputation, and for the estimation of the accuracy of genomic breeding values. The imputation method was developed for a situation in which selection candidates are genotyped with an SNP panel of reduced density but have high-density genotyped sires. The dams of selection candidates are not genotyped. The methods were applied to a sire line pig population with 895 German Piétrain boars genotyped with the PorcineSNP60 BeadChip. Results: Genotype imputation error rates were 0.133 for a 384 marker panel, 0.079 for a 768 marker panel, and 0.022 for a 3000 marker panel. Error rates for markers with approximated positions were slightly larger. Availability of high-density genotypes for close relatives of the selection candidates reduced the imputation error rate. The estimated decrease in the accuracy of genomic breeding values due to imputation errors was 3% for the 384 marker panel and negligible for larger panels, provided that at least one parent of the selection candidates was genotyped at high-density. Genomic breeding values predicted from deregressed breeding values with low reliabilities were more strongly correlated with the estimated BLUP breeding values than with the true breeding values. This was not the case when a shortened pedigree was used to predict BLUP breeding values, in which the parents of the individuals genotyped at high-density were considered unknown. Conclusions: Genomic selection with imputation from very low- to high-density marker panels is a promising strategy for the implementation of genomic selection at acceptable costs. A panel size of 384 markers can be recommended for selection candidates of a pig breeding program if at least one parent is genotyped at high-density, but this appears to be the lower bound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]