Search

Background: Concerns regarding the primary stability of early adjustable loop button (ALB) devices for cortical fixation of tendon grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have led to the development of new implant designs. Purpose: To evaluate biomechanical stability of recent ALB implants in comparison with a continuous loop button (CLB) device. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: ACLR was performed in a porcine model (n = 40) using 2-strand porcine flexor tendons with a diameter of 8 mm. Three ALB devices (Infinity Button [ALB1 group]; Tightrope II RT [ALB2 group]; A-TACK [ALB3 group]) and 1 CLB device (FlippTack with polyethylene suture) were used for cortical tendon graft fixation. Cyclic loading (1000 cycles up to 250 N) with complete unloading were applied to the free end of the tendon graft using a uniaxial testing machine, followed by load to failure. Elongation, stiffness, yield load, and ultimate failure load were recorded and compared between the groups using a Kruskal-Wallis test with post hoc Dunn correction. Results: Elongation after 1000 cycles at 250 N was similar between groups (ALB1, 4.5 ± 0.7 mm; ALB2, 4.8 ± 0.8 mm; ALB3, 4.5 ± 0.6 mm; CLB, 4.5 ± 0.8 mm), as was load to failure (ALB1, 838 ± 109 N; ALB2, 930 ± 89 N; ALB3, 809 ± 103 N; CLB, 842 ± 80 N). Stiffness was significantly higher in the ALB1 group compared with the CLB group (262.3 ± 21.6 vs 229.3 ± 15.1 N/mm; P < .05). No significant difference was found between the 4 groups regarding yield load. Constructs failed either by rupture of the loop, breakage of the button, or rupture of the tendon. Conclusion: The tested third-generation ALB devices for cortical fixation in ACLR withstood cyclic loading with complete unloading without significant differences to a CLB device. Clinical Relevance: The third-generation ALB devices tested in the present study provided biomechanical stability comparable with that of a CLB device. Furthermore, ultimate failure loads of all tested implants exceeded the loads expected to occur in the postoperative period after ACLR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hinge fractures are considered risk factors for delayed or nonunion of the osteotomy gap in distal femoral osteotomies (DFOs). Limited evidence exists regarding the treatment of hinge fractures after DFO, which could improve stability and thus bone healing. Purpose: To (1) examine the effect of hinge fractures on the biomechanical properties of the bone-implant construct, (2) evaluate the biomechanical advantages of an additional fixation of a hinge fracture, and (3) test the biomechanical properties of different types of varisation DFOs. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 32 fresh-frozen human distal femora equally underwent medial closing wedge DFO or lateral opening wedge DFO using a unilateral locking compression plate. The following conditions were serially tested: (1) preserved hinge; (2) hinge fracture along the osteotomy plane; (3) screw fixation of the hinge fracture; and (4) locking T-plate fixation of the hinge fracture. Using a servo-hydraulic materials testing machine, we subjected each construct to 15 cycles of axial compression (400 N; 20 N/s) and internal and external rotational loads (10 N·m; 0.5 N·m/s) to evaluate the stiffness. The axial and torsional hinge displacement was recorded using a 3-dimensional optical measuring system. Repeated-measures 1-way analysis of variance and post hoc Bonferroni correction were used for multiple comparisons. Statistical significance was set at P <.05. Results: Independent from the type of osteotomy, a fractured hinge significantly (P <.001) increased rotational displacement and reduced stiffness of the bone-implant construct, resulting in ≥1.92 mm increased displacement and ≥70% reduced stiffness in each rotational direction, while the axial stiffness remained unchanged. For both procedures, neither a screw nor a plate could restore intact rotational stiffness (P <.01), while only the plate was able to restore intact rotational displacement. However, the plate always performed better compared with the screw, with significantly higher and lower values for stiffness (+38% to +53%; P <.05) and displacement (–55% to −72%; P <.01), respectively, in ≥1 rotational direction. At the same time, the type of osteotomy did not significantly affect axial and torsional stability. Conclusion: Hinge fractures after medial closing wedge DFO and lateral opening wedge DFO caused decreased bone-implant construct rotational stiffness and increased fracture-site displacement. In contrast, the axial stiffness remained unchanged in the cadaveric model. Clinical Relevance: When considering an osteosynthesis of a hinge fracture in a DFO, an additional plate fixation was the construct with the highest stiffness and least displacement, which could restore intact hinge rotational displacement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The promising biomechanical stability of bone staples (BSs) in cortical fixation of tendon grafts for medial collateral ligament (MCL) reconstruction has been revealed by a previous investigation. However, it is currently unknown if the biomechanical stability of cortical fixation of tendon grafts depends on the BS design. Purpose: To assess the biomechanical stability of cortical fixation of tendon grafts in knee surgery using 4 different BS designs. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Cortical fixation of tendon grafts was performed in a porcine knee model at the tibial insertion area of the MCL using 4 different BS designs (n = 40): 8-mm width without spikes (n = 10), 8-mm width with spikes (n = 10), 14-mm width with spikes (n = 10), and 13 mm–wide 4-prong staples with spikes (n = 10). Specimens were mounted in a materials testing machine, and cyclic loading was applied to the tendon graft (500 cycles at 50 and 100 N, respectively), followed by load-to-failure testing. The Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for statistical analysis (P <.05), and the post hoc Dunn test was performed for multiple comparisons. Results: In 4 of 10 specimens with graft fixation using BSs without spikes, slippage of the tendon underneath the BS led to failure of the construct during cyclic loading to 100 N. In the other groups, no fixation failure was observed during cyclic loading. Furthermore, graft fixation using BSs without spikes was found to have significantly more elongation during cyclic loading (8.2 ± 1.9 mm) and a lower ultimate failure load (170 ± 120 N) compared with graft fixation using narrow BSs with spikes (3.4 ± 1.2 mm [ P <.0001] and 364 ± 85 N [ P <.05], respectively) and graft fixation using broad BSs with spikes (4.5 ± 1.4 mm [ P <.05] and 429 ± 67 N [ P <.001], respectively). No statistical differences in elongation during cyclic loading or ultimate failure load were found between 4-prong staples with spikes (5.0 ± 1.3 mm and 304 ± 85 N) and narrow or broad staples with spikes. Conclusion: The biomechanical stability of cortical fixation of an MCL graft was comparable between each BS design with spikes (narrow, broad, and 4-prong) in a porcine knee model, whereas BSs without spikes led to failure of the fixation construct during cyclic loading in 4 of 10 specimens and increased elongation and lower ultimate failure loads in the remainder of the group. BSs without spikes may therefore not be recommended for graft fixation. Clinical Relevance: The use of BSs can help to avoid the conflict of converging tunnels in multiligament reconstruction surgery. An implant design with spikes yields significantly higher biomechanical stability than BSs without spikes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]