Search

Study design:Cross-sectional.Objectives:To evaluate exercise equipment preferences and compare cardiometabolic demand for passive hybrid and arm-only exercise among adults with paraplegia (PP) and those with tetraplegia (TP).Setting:Four community exercise programmes.Methods:Thirty-six adults (mean age: 41.1±12.1 years) with chronic (11.4±10.7 years post injury) TP (C3-C8; n=17) or PP (T3-T12; n=19) were recruited. Participants completed 20 min of submaximal aerobic exercise at moderate to vigorous intensity on four types of aerobic exercise equipment: arm cycle ergometer (ACE), arm glider (AG), arm-leg recumbent stepper (ALRS), and arm-leg cycle ergometer (ALCE). Participants also completed 3 sets of 10 repetitions of resistance exercise using wall pulleys (WP) and weight stack (WS) equipment. A questionnaire was administered to evaluate equipment preference. Heart rate (HR) and oxygen uptake (VO2) were measured in a subset of participants (n=9) during submaximal aerobic exercise.Results:Arm-only exercise modes were perceived as being safer than passive hybrid exercise modes. There were no differences in perceived enjoyment between equipment types and groups. There were significant group but not equipment differences in HR (TP: 101.4 bpm; PP: 124.9 bpm) and VO2 (TP: 6.5 ml•kg−1•min−1; PP: 10.5 mL•kg−1•min−1) during submaximal aerobic exercise.Conclusion:In this cross-community assessment of exercise equipment preferences after spinal cord injury (SCI), arm-only exercise modes were perceived as safer than hybrid exercise modes and there were no differences between equipment types in physiological responses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:Sixteen-week follow-up study.Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of referral from a health-care provider to regular exercise combined with 16 weeks of counselling support following discharge from inpatient or outpatient spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation.Setting:Two rehabilitation centres in Canada.Methods:Seventeen participants (age 42.1±10.6 years, C3-T12, ASIA impairment score A-C) were recruited at discharge from inpatient (n=9; 5.2±1.3 months post-injury) or outpatient (n=8; 14.2±3.8 months post-injury) rehabilitation and were given a referral for regular exercise. Telephone counselling support was provided and adherence to the prescribed program was monitored for 16 weeks.Results:There was a nonsignificant difference in exercise adherence rates (percentage of available sessions attended) between participants discharged from inpatient (71.4±44.9%) and those from outpatient (39.5±27.2%) rehabilitation programs. The most common barriers to participation were physical health problems (50%) and transportation (36%). An exercise beliefs questionnaire revealed that participants value exercise at discharge from rehabilitation, despite the common report of a relative lack of confidence in their ability to perform or adapt aerobic and resistance exercises to their specific capabilities.Conclusion:A system of direct referral and ongoing counselling support following discharge from either inpatient or outpatient SCI rehabilitation appears to encourage sustained participation, although future health promotion strategies should continue to provide specific information about how to adapt and complete aerobic and resistance exercises.Sponsorship:Rick Hansen Institute and Ontario Neurotrauma Foundation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study design:The study design used is cross-sectional.Objectives:The aim of this study is to examine muscle contractile and excitability characteristics during fatigue of the tibialis anterior in six individuals with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) and matched able-bodied (AB) controls.Setting:McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.Methods:Muscle compound action potential (M-wave) characteristics, muscle twitch properties, and summated force were examined during a 2 min fatigue protocol of intermittent bursts at 30 Hz (4 s tetanus, 2 s rest) or maximal voluntary contraction (MVC). Evoked twitch responses were followed during a recovery period.Results:M-wave amplitude was smaller in SCI (2.5±1.6 mV in SCI, 5.7±3.2 mV in AB) at baseline, but there was no change in M-wave amplitude or area during fatigue in either group. There was an increase in M-wave duration toward the end of recovery in the SCI group. Peak torque (PT) was not different between groups at baseline (3.8±1.8 Nm in SCI, 3.7±0.6 Nm in AB); PT potentiated significantly during fatigue in the AB, but not SCI group. There was significantly greater fatigue of both PT (43% decline) and summated force (57% decline) in the SCI group compared with the AB group (13% increase and 22% decline for PT and MVC, respectively).Conclusion:The dorsiflexor muscles in people with SCI are significantly more fatiguable than those in AB controls, but decreases in muscle excitability do not seem to be an important contributor to the increased fatiguability. The mechanisms behind the increased fatigue must lie distal to the muscle membrane. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]