Search

Background and Purpose: Electronic health record systems (EHRSs) are widely used to record patients' data and should be compatible with nurses' workflow. The purpose of this study was to adapt the Workflow Integration Survey (WIS) to the Turkish language and examine the reliability and validity measures of the Turkish version of the scale. Methods: In this methodological study, data were collected between December 2019 and February 2020 from 120 nurses. This study included the following phases: translation and evaluation of the content validity; explanatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analysis. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for the test–retest reliability with 30 nurses. Results: The results of CFA revealed a two factors' structure, and these two factors explained 50.57% of the total variance. This was confirmed (χ2/ df = 1.673, goodness-of-fit index = 0.948, incremental fit index = 0.923, comparative fit index = 0.918, root mean square error of approximation = 0.075, and standardized root mean square residual = 0.0604) using structural equation modeling. The total Cronbach's alpha value was found to be.702,.636, and.649 for the subscales. The ICC was calculated for test–retest reliability and was found to be 0.871. Conclusions: The validity and reliability of the WIS have been found to be sufficient. It is recommended that the validity and reliability studies on the WIS be conducted in different hospitals with a larger number of participants. Furthermore, the use of the scale in cross-cultural studies to evaluate the compatibility of EHRSs with nurses' workflow in different cultures is also suggested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PHEinAction® is a theory‐based nurse‐led patient engagement intervention developed among an Italian older adult population with various chronic diseases to facilitate cognitive, emotional, and behavioral processes in promoting individuals' active roles. This study aims to adapt and evaluate the effectiveness of PHEinAction® on diabetes self‐management (DSM) among Turkish type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. First, the generic content of the intervention was customized for diabetes management and adapted for the Turkish population, including back‐forward translation and expert panel evaluation; then, a randomized controlled trial was conducted with 51 adult diabetes patients randomly assigned to intervention or the control group receiving the usual care. The intervention consisted of two in‐person sessions of 4‐week intervals, a telephone consultation, and home‐based written exercises, which involved personalized care activities addressing individuals' engagement levels and covering the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral aspects. The scores for treatment adherence, self‐efficacy, and patient engagement had significantly improved with a large size effect in the intervention group at the fourth‐week follow‐up compared with the control group. Findings suggest that the nurse‐led personalized patient engagement program could effectively promote DSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of web‐based nursing process teaching on senior nursing students' care plan preparation skills. METHODS: Pretest‐posttest intervention design was used. A total of 131 senior nursing students were evaluated for 5 weeks. Data were collected using a datasheet, a nursing care plan (pretest‐posttest), and a self‐efficacy form. FINDINGS: The intervention group had significantly higher data collection, planning stage scores, and a total care plan score than the others. The intervention group was competent in all self‐efficacy items, except the one concerning prioritizing nursing diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: Web‐based nursing process teaching offered with the curriculum helps students to develop care planning skills. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: It is necessary to focus on different teaching methods and using standardized terminology in teaching the nursing process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of International Journal of Nursing Knowledge is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)