1. Associations between new obesity indices and abnormal bone density in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.
- Author
-
Deng, Xia, Wu, Xunan, Sun, Ziyan, Liu, Qiaoyan, and Yuan, Guoyue
- Subjects
OBESITY risk factors ,RISK assessment ,PREDICTIVE tests ,OSTEOPENIA ,PEARSON correlation (Statistics) ,BONE density ,BLOOD chemical analysis ,BODY mass index ,DATA analysis ,RECEIVER operating characteristic curves ,GLUCOSE tolerance tests ,BODY weight ,LOGISTIC regression analysis ,INSULIN ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,WAIST circumference ,BONE fractures ,TYPE 2 diabetes ,WAIST-hip ratio ,STATISTICS ,OSTEOPOROSIS ,COMPARATIVE studies ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,DATA analysis software ,SENSITIVITY & specificity (Statistics) ,DISEASE risk factors ,DISEASE complications - Abstract
Summary: The clinical data analysis found that, compared with the traditional obesity index, the waist-weight ratio (WWR) has more advantages in predicting abnormal bone mineral density in subjects with type 2 diabetes. WWR may serve as a new predictive indicator for osteoporosis in T2DM patients. Purpose: This study was designed to explore the correlation between obesity-related indices and bone mineral density (BMD) and its influencing factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. Methods: A total of 528 patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited. Glucose tolerance, insulin stimulation, and blood biochemical tests were conducted on all participants. All subjects underwent dual-energy X-ray bone density testing and were grouped based on the bone density results. Results: Compared with those in the normal BMD group, the waist-to-body weight ratio (WWR) and weight-adjusted-waist index (WWI) in the osteopenia and osteoporosis groups were significantly greater, while body mass index (BMI) was significantly lower (P < 0.05). The logistic regression results showed that the WWR, WWI, and BMI were independently correlated with abnormal BMD in T2DM patients (P < 0.05). WWR and the WWI were negatively correlated with the T-value of bone density in various parts of the body, while BMI was positively correlated with the T-value of bone density (P < 0.05). The area under the working characteristic curve (AUC) for T2DM patients with abnormal bone mass predicted by the WWR [0.806, 95% CI = (0.770–0.843), P < 0.001] was greater than that for patients with other obesity indicators, such as the WWI and BMI. Conclusion: We found a positive correlation between the WWR and bone density in T2DM patients. Compared with other obesity indicators, such as BMI and WWI, the WWR has a stronger discriminative ability for T2DM patients with abnormal bone density. Therefore, more attention should be given to the WWR in T2DM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF