Search

BACKGROUND: COVID‐19 screening testing (ST) can detect asymptomatic or pre‐symptomatic cases, allowing for prompt identification of cases and close contacts. This study examined parents' and school staffs' knowledge and attitudes toward to a pilot school‐based ST program in a school district in southern Arizona. METHODS: In May 2021, online surveys to parents and school staff were administered to examine attitudes toward ST and impacts of the COVID‐19 pandemic. Unweighted percent estimates were calculated, and bivariate differences were examined by demographics. Associations were assessed using chi‐square tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: The survey had response rates of 10% (606/6085) and 22% (187/849) among parents and staff, respectively. Approximately one‐third of responding parents (35%) would or already allow their child to participate in school‐based ST, 37% would not participate; 28% were unsure. Among responding staff, 46% would or already participate in ST, 33% would not; 21% were unsure. The top concern (38%) among responding staff was taking job‐related leave if testing positive. CONCLUSION: Schools work to balance the needs of students, families, and staff by implementing supportive and flexible policies and practices founded on buy‐in and acceptance from their communities [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: Despite widespread availability of COVID‐19 vaccines, millions of Americans have not received the recommended vaccine doses. In the District of Columbia (DC), COVID‐19 vaccination rates are lowest among residents who are Non‐Hispanic (NH) Black and among school‐aged children. We assessed COVID‐19 vaccine hesitancy among staff and parents of students in DC K‐12 public and public charter schools. METHODS: We conducted a telephone‐based survey from February 6 to April 16, 2022 to staff, students, and parents of students who participated in school‐based COVID‐19 screening testing. COVID‐19‐related survey items included: vaccination status, reasons for not getting vaccinated, perceived vaccine access, and trusted COVID‐19 information sources. Utilizing time‐to‐event analyses, we evaluated differences across demographic groups. RESULTS: The interview response rate was 25.8% (308/1193). Most unvaccinated participants were NH Black and ages 5 to 11 years. Median time from vaccine eligibility to uptake was 236 days for NH Black participants vs. 10 days for NH White participants. Vaccine safety was the top concern among unvaccinated participants. Government and healthcare providers were the most trusted COVID‐19 information sources. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in timing of vaccine uptake among respondents and greater vaccine hesitancy among NH Black participants compared to other racial/ethnic groups highlight a need for continued tailored outreach and communication using trusted sources to convey the importance, benefits, and safety of COVID‐19 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The highly transmissible severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant led to increased hospitalizations, staffing shortages, and increased school closures. To reduce spread in school-aged children during the Omicron peak, the District of Columbia implemented a test-to-return strategy in public and public charter schools after a 2-week break from in-person learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: In January 2014, 4-methylcyclohexanemethanol spilled into the Elk River near Charleston, West Virginia, contaminating the water supply for about 120000 households. The West Virginia American Water Company (WVAWC) issued a "do not use" water order for 9 counties. After the order was lifted (10 days after the spill), the communities' use of public water systems, information sources, alternative sources of water, and perceived impact of the spill on households were unclear to public health officials. To assist in recovery efforts, the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention conducted a Community Assessment for Public Health Emergency Response (CASPER). Methods: We used the CASPER 2-stage cluster sampling design to select a representative sample of households to interview, and we conducted interviews in 171 households in April 2014. We used a weighted cluster analysis to generate population estimates in the sampling frame. Results: Before the spill, 74.4% of households did not have a 3-day alternative water supply for each household member and pet. Although 83.6% of households obtained an alternative water source within 1 day of the "do not use" order, 37.4% of households reportedly used WVAWC water for any purpose. Nearly 3 months after the spill, 36.1% of households believed that their WVAWC water was safe, and 33.5% reported using their household water for drinking. Conclusions: CASPER results identified the need to focus on basic public health messaging and household preparedness efforts. Recommendations included (1) encouraging households to maintain a 3-day emergency water supply, (2) identifying additional alternative sources of water for future emergencies, and (3) increasing community education to address ongoing concerns about water. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]