Search

Introduction: The quality of an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT) or paramedic training program is likely one factor that contributes to a candidate's success on the National Registry Cognitive Examination. However, program pass rates and their associated geographic location have not previously been evaluated. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of EMT and paramedic programs in the United States, pass rates on the National Registry Cognitive Examinations, and relationship to geography. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMT and paramedic programs' first and cumulative third attempt pass rates on the National Registry Cognitive Examination in 2015. Included were civilian EMT and paramedic programs with >5 graduates testing for certification. Descriptive statistics were calculated for program pass rates, total graduates testing, and pass rates by National Association of State EMS Officials (NASEMSO) regions. Results: We included 1,939 EMT programs (6–1,892 graduates testing/program) and 602 paramedic programs (6–689 graduates testing/program). We excluded 262 (11.9%) EMT and 51 (7.8%) paramedic programs with ≤5 graduates testing annually due to unstable estimates of program pass rates. EMT programs in the highest quartile for total number of graduates testing outperformed the lowest quartile in both first attempt (65.7% vs. 61.9%, p < 0.001) and cumulative third attempt pass rates (79.1% vs 72.7%, p < 0.001). This difference was also seen for paramedic programs on first attempt (77.3% vs. 62.5%, p < 0.001) and cumulative third attempt (91.9% vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001). EMT program pass rates for first and cumulative third attempts also varied by NASEMSO region (first: 62–68%; third: 74–78%) with the Great Lakes and West regions outperforming the other regions. Paramedic program pass rates differed by NASEMSO regions as well (first: 65–83%; third: 81–95%) with highest pass rates in the West region. Conclusions Program performance for both EMT and paramedic programs varies by total number of graduates testing and geographic location. Graduates from larger EMT and paramedic programs have higher first and cumulative third attempt pass rates compared to graduates from smaller programs. Additionally, there is variability in program pass rates across NASEMSO regions for both certification levels. Further evaluation is necessary to better understand the variability in program performance in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Emergency medical response is provided by volunteer emergency medical services (EMS) professionals in many parts of the United States. However, little is known about those who serve as volunteer EMS professionals, especially as their main EMS job. Our objective was to compare the characteristics of nationally-certified volunteer versus paid EMS professionals in the U.S. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of EMS professionals who recertified their National EMS Certification between October 1, 2017–March 31, 2018 or October 1, 2018–March 31, 2019. Data were obtained from 2 cycles of the biennial National EMS Certification recertification application. We included currently working, nonmilitary EMS professionals aged 18–85 years at the emergency medical technician (EMT) or higher certification level. Volunteer was defined as receiving nominal or no compensation for the provision of EMS services at an agency as the main EMS job. Comparisons were made, accounting for the large sample size, to determine notable differences between volunteer and paid EMS professionals. Results: Of the 154,229 EMS professionals that met inclusion criteria (response rate = 86%), 13% volunteered at their main EMS job. More volunteer than paid EMS professionals were female (38% vs. 22%). There was also a significant difference in certification level between volunteer and paid (EMT: 82% vs. 46%). Three-quarters (74%) of volunteer EMS professionals reported working in rural communities compared to 30% of paid. The states with the largest proportion of volunteers to any currently working EMS professionals who recertified were Vermont (47%) and North Dakota (45%). Conclusion: Approximately 13% of the EMS workforce held a primary job in EMS as a volunteer, and these volunteer EMS professionals differed from their paid counterparts – e.g., volunteers were more likely to be women, have EMT certification, and work in rural areas. We encourage further research to understand motivations for volunteering in EMS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergency medical services (EMS) workforce is a key component of healthcare in the U.S. Characteristics of active EMS professionals who are treating patients in the prehospital setting is unclear. The purpose of this study was to describe the roles and settings in which nationally certified EMS professionals are providing patient care and to evaluate similarities and differences of the demographics and practice settings of the three major certification levels. We conducted a cross-sectional evaluation of all nationally certified EMS professionals in the U.S. that recertified between October 1, 2017 and March 31, 2018 and October 1, 2018 and March 31, 2019. Within the recertification application, EMS professionals completed an optional demographic profile. Those who were nationally certified, functioning as a patient care provider for at least one nonmilitary EMS organization, aged 18 to 85 years, and recertified at the EMT level or higher were included. Demographic, agency and job characteristics were assessed and descriptive statistics were calculated. In 2017-2018, 101,363 EMS professionals recertified and 87,471 (86%) completed the profile; in 2018-2019, 106,893 EMS professionals recertified and 92,640 (87%) completed the profile. Of the 142,751 EMS professionals who met inclusion criteria, the population was primarily male (76%) and age increased by certification level. By race/ethnicity, 85% were white, 5% were Hispanic/Latino, 5% were Black/African American, 2% were American Indian/Alaskan Native, 2% were Asian and 1% were Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander. Paramedics had the highest proportion of associate degrees (EMT:16.0%; AEMT:16.6%; paramedic:28.5%); some college experience was common for all certification levels (EMT:34.7%; AEMT:37.2%; paramedic:31.6%). Most EMS professionals reported 3-7 years of experience, were working full-time (78%) and 28% were working for 2 or more agencies. Most were working for a fire department (48%) or private agency (21%) and providing 9-1-1 service (72%). No substantial differences were observed between the two recertification cycles. This is the most comprehensive study evaluating the demographics of the national EMS workforce of active patient care providers. Understanding the characteristics of EMS professionals and the settings they practice in is important for educational and training initiatives, as well as protocols and policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: In response for the need of a freely available, stand‐alone, validated outcome measure for use within musculoskeletal (MSK) physiotherapy practice, sensitive enough to measure clinical effectiveness, we developed an MSK patient reported outcome measure. Objectives: This study examined the validity and reliability of the newly developed Brighton musculoskeletal Patient‐Reported Outcome Measure (BmPROM) within physiotherapy outpatient settings. Methods: Two hundred twenty‐four patients attending physiotherapy outpatient departments in South East England with an MSK condition participated in this study. The BmPROM was assessed for user friendliness (rated feedback, N = 224), reliability (internal consistency and test–retest reliability, n = 42), validity (internal and external construct validity, N = 224), and responsiveness (internal, n = 25). Results: Exploratory factor analysis indicated that a two‐factor model provides a good fit to the data. Factors were representative of “Functionality” and “Wellbeing”. Correlations observed between the BmPROM and SF‐36 domains provided evidence of convergent validity. Reliability results indicated that both subscales were internally consistent with alphas above the acceptable limits for both “Functionality” (α = .85, 95% CI [.81, .88]) and ‘Wellbeing’ (α = .80, 95% CI [.75, .84]). Test–retest analyses (n = 42) demonstrated a high degree of reliability between “Functionality” (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]) and “Wellbeing” scores (ICC = .84; 95% CI [.72, .91]). Further examination of test–retest reliability through the Bland–Altman analysis demonstrated that the difference between “Functionality” and “Wellbeing” test scores did not vary as a function of absolute test score. Large treatment effect sizes were found for both subscales (Functionality d = 1.10; Wellbeing 1.03). Conclusion: The BmPROM is a reliable and valid outcome measure for use in evaluating physiotherapy treatment of MSK conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose:To explore factors influencing physical activity (PA) reported by people living in rural/semi-rural communities in the south of England post-stroke, and to understand relationships between personal, interpersonal and environmental barriers and self-reported levels of PA. Method:A survey was mailed to patients of NHS Trusts who were identified as potential participants. Self-reported PA levels, type, and frequency of reported barriers were tabulated. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient was used to explore associations between self-reported PA level and: age, gender, level of physical function, fear of falling, beliefs regarding PA, available supports, and socioeconomic status. Results:Seventy-six of 322 questionnaires distributed were returned (24%). Only 55.2% of respondents reported undertaking PA of sufficient intensity to meet current guidelines. Personal barriers included fear of falling, stroke-related disability, pain, and fatigue. Interpersonal and environmental barriers included lack of social support, transport, and inclement weather. Significant relationships existed between self-reported PA and fear of falling, functional mobility, and beliefs relating to PA. Conclusions:Almost half of the survey cohort reported PA levels insufficient to meet current guidelines. Similar to barriers reported in previous studies in USA and other parts of the UK, numerous interlinking and overlapping personal, interpersonal, and environmental barriers to undertaking PA were identified.Implications for RehabilitationThis study found that although more than 60% of the survey population were able to ambulate >200 m, only 55.2% reported undertaking sufficient PA to meet current guidelines, putting them at increased risk of further stroke and other co-morbidities.Participants reported a number of interlinking and overlapping personal, interpersonal, and environmental barriers to undertaking PA, which may explain this discrepancy between mobility status and self reported activity levels.Rehabilitation professionals and primary care providers are well positioned to address the barriers identified in this survey, such as providing interventions to reduce fear of falling, pain, and fatigue, providing support and education about safely increasing physical activity and addressing unhelpful beliefs about PA.Behaviour change strategies, such as increasing self-efficacy, and partnering with the person with stroke to problem solve strategies to address the barriers identified by this, and related research, are likely to be more successful in increasing PA than providing information alone. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]