Search

The $${ DD}\alpha $$ -classifier, a nonparametric fast and very robust procedure, is described and applied to fifty classification problems regarding a broad spectrum of real-world data. The procedure first transforms the data from their original property space into a depth space, which is a low-dimensional unit cube, and then separates them by a projective invariant procedure, called $$\alpha $$ -procedure. To each data point the transformation assigns its depth values with respect to the given classes. Several alternative depth notions (spatial depth, Mahalanobis depth, projection depth, and Tukey depth, the latter two being approximated by univariate projections) are used in the procedure, and compared regarding their average error rates. With the Tukey depth, which fits the distributions' shape best and is most robust, 'outsiders', that is data points having zero depth in all classes, appear. They need an additional treatment for classification. Evidence is also given about the dimension of the extended feature space needed for linear separation. The $${ DD}\alpha $$ -procedure is available as an R-package. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data depth is a concept in multivariate statistics that measures the centrality of a point in a given data cloud in R d. If the depth of a point can be represented as the minimum of the depths with respect to all one-dimensional projections of the data, then the depth satisfies the so-called projection property. Such depths form an important class that includes many of the depths that have been proposed in literature. For depths that satisfy the projection property an approximate algorithm can easily be constructed since taking the minimum of the depths with respect to only a finite number of one-dimensional projections yields an upper bound for the depth with respect to the multivariate data. Such an algorithm is particularly useful if no exact algorithm exists or if the exact algorithm has a high computational complexity, as is the case with the halfspace depth or the projection depth. To compute these depths in high dimensions, the use of an approximate algorithm with better complexity is surely preferable. Instead of focusing on a single method we provide a comprehensive and fair comparison of several methods, both already described in the literature and original. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]