1. Multi-criteria decision-making using a complete ranking of generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers: modified results.
- Author
-
Ahuja, Raina, Kumar, Amit, and Appadoo, S. S.
- Subjects
- *
FUZZY numbers , *REAL numbers , *RESEARCH personnel , *DECISION making - Abstract
Marimuthu and Mahapatra (Soft Comput 25:9859–9871, 2021) claimed that several methods are proposed in the literature to solve such multi-criteria decision-making problems in which the rating value of each alternative over each attribute is represented by a generalized trapezoidal fuzzy number. However, the ranking methods, used in existing fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods, fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Therefore, it is inappropriate to use existing fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. To resolve the inappropriateness of fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods, Marimuthu and Mahapatra, first, defined some score functions to transform a generalized trapezoidal fuzzy number into its equivalent real number. Then, Marimuthu and Mahapatra stated and proved some results regarding their proposed score functions. Thereafter, using the proposed results, Marimuthu and Mahapatra proposed a ranking method for comparing generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Marimuthu and Mahapatra also proved that their proposed ranking method will never fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Finally, Marimuthu and Mahapatra proposed a method, based on their proposed ranking method, to solve fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problems. Jeevaraj (Soft Comput 26:11225–11230, 2022) considered some counterexamples to show that Marimuthu and Mahapatra's results are not correct. Jeevaraj also considered some counterexamples to show that Marimuthu and Mahapatra's ranking method also fails to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Furthermore, Jeevaraj proposed the correct results corresponding to Marimuthu and Mahapatra's results as well as Jeevaraj suggested the required modification in Marimuthu and Mahapatra's ranking method. Finally, Jeevaraj proved that the modified ranking method will never fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. In the future, researchers may use the results and the ranking method, proposed by Jeevaraj, to solve real-life fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problems. However, in this paper, some counterexamples are considered to show that Jeevaraj's modified results are also not correct. In addition, some counterexamples are considered to show that the modified ranking method, proposed by Jeevaraj, also fails to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Hence, it is inappropriate to use the results and the ranking method, proposed by Jeevaraj, for solving real-life fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making problems. Furthermore, the correct results, corresponding to Marimuthu and Mahapatra's results, are stated and proved. Finally, it is proved that Marimuthu and Mahapatra's ranking method as well as Jeevaraj's ranking method will never fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers having the same heights. However, both methods may fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers having different heights. It is pertinent to mention that as there exist several ranking methods which will never fail to distinguish two distinct generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. So, one may use any such ranking method to compare generalized trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF