Search

Everything in the world almost resembles each other which could find out with the help of some measures. Similarity measure (SM) is one of them that play a dominant role in decision-making (D M g ). The higher the value of the SM, the more the things will match perfectly. Weights of criteria appear to specify that the decision-makers (DMs) recognize the significance of public views and their influence on reaching an ideal solution. Sometimes DMs hesitate or they are uncertain to assign the weights to the criteria because of their similar nature. Linear programming (LP) technique has been implemented to evaluate the weights of criteria to reduce the complexity of DMs so that they can avoid biasedness. An extension of fuzzy sets (FSs) named dual hesitant fuzzy sets (DHFSs) is utilized to handle ambiguous and uncertain information. Based on the Hausdorff metric and the Hamming distance, SM is developed to establish the multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) approach to resolve the problems. Moreover, based on the proposed SM, the technique for order of preference similar to the ideal solution (TOPSIS) is extended to strengthen the obtained outcomes. The effectiveness of the suggested approach is validated by considering a practical example. To support the outcomes obtained by using the proposed model, sensitivity analysis (SA) and time complexity (TC) analysis have been performed. A comprehensive comparison with other techniques is performed to validate the proposed MCDM model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this paper is to develop Pythagorean fuzzy (PF) multi‐objective optimization by ratio analysis (PF‐MOORA) plus full MULTIplicative form (PF‐MULTIMOORA) method for solving multicriteria decision making (MCDM) problems with completely unknown information of criteria weights. In the model formulation process, a new distance measure is defined to quantify the difference between PF sets by combining Hamming distance and Hausdorff metric. This distance measure is, subsequently, implemented in entropy weight model for determining unknown weights of criteria, and also in reference point approach for obtaining preference indices of alternatives. To overcome the deficiencies occurred in existing MULTIMOORA method, like multiple comparisons, circular reasoning, and so on, an aggregation‐based approach is recommended in the proposed PF‐MULTIMOORA. To demonstrate the feasibility and practicality of the proposed method, an example concerning strategy prioritization of a tiles manufacturing company is presented. In the strategy evaluation process, at first, the judgement values provided by the decision maker are expressed in linguistic terms, and then those are converted into PF numbers through a PF weighting scale. The sensitivity of the proposed model is validated by changing of weights of criteria which impact on the ranks of the strategies. To show robustness of the developed method, the result attained by applying PF‐MULTIMOORA is compared with existing techniques, not only in crisp and fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix context, but also using four other MCDM methods, namely, modified PF‐MOORA, as a particular case of the proposed PF‐MULTIMOORA technique, PF weighted sum, PF‐TOPSIS and PF‐VIKOR. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Currently, an important issue in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problems are vagueness and lack of precision of decision- -making information because of insufficient data and incapability of the decision maker to process the information. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFS) are a solution to eliminate the vagueness and the uncertainty. While fuzzy sets (FS) deal with ambiguity and vagueness problem, IFSs have more advantages. Moreover, the CODAS-SORT method cannot handle the uncertainty and ambiguity of information provided by human judgments. The aim of this study is to develop an IF extension of CODAS-SORT combining this method with the IFS theory. To achieve this, we use the fuzzy weighted Euclidean distance and fuzzy weighted Hamming distance instead of the crisp distances. A case study of a supplier selection assessment is used to clarify the details of our proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neutrosophic set theory as a generalization of the fuzzy set theory and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory is an effective tool to deal with inconsistent, imprecise, and vague information. TOPSIS is a multiple attribute method to identify solutions from a finite set of alternatives based upon simultaneous minimization of distance from an ideal point and maximization of distance from a nadir point. In this paper, we first develop a new Hamming distance between single-valued neutrosophic numbers and then present an extension of the TOPSIS method for multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) based on single-valued neutrosophic sets, where the inform ation about attribute values and attribute weights are expressed by decision-makers based on neutrosophic numbers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, a new version of distance measure for hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets is developed. The new version of distance measure provides an objective way to handle the diverse dimensions of two HFLTSs, i.e., without shortening the HFLTS to be a linguistic interval or extending the shorter one by adding linguistic terms. The Hamming distance, the Euclidean distance and the corresponding forms are put forward. By the relationship between the distance measure and the similarity measure, some parallel similarity measures are also investigated. As applications of the proposed measures, the issues of pattern recognition, clustering analysis and multi-criteria decision making are considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]