Search

Background: Decisions of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment are frequent in emergency departments (ED) and patients are often unable to communicate their wishes concerning end of life desires.Objective: To evaluate the participation of general practitioners (GPs) during the decision-making process of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments in ED.Design: Prospective observational multicenter study.Patients: We included patients for whom a decision of withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatments was made in ED. For each patient, we enrolled one general practitioner.Main Measures: GPs were interviewed about their perception of end of life patient's management and the communication with ED and families.Key Results: There were 109 potential patient participants. We obtained answers from 54 (49.5%) of the patient's associated GPs. Only 4 (7.4%) GPs were involved during the decision-making process of withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments. Among GPs, 29 (53.7%) were contacted by family after the decision, most often to talk about their difficult experience with the decision. A majority (94%) believed their involvements in these decisions were important and 68% wished to "always" participate in end of life decisions despite the fact that they usually don't participate in these decisions. Finally, 66% of GPs believed that management of end of life in the emergency department was a failure and should be anticipated.Conclusions: GPs would like to be more involved and barriers to GP involvement need to be overcome. We do not have any outcome data to suggest that routine involvement of GPs in all end of life patients improves their outcomes. Moreover, it requires major system and process-based changes to involve all primary care physicians in ED decision-making.Nih Trial Registry Number: NCT02844972. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In emergency departments, for some patients, death is preceded by a decision of withholding or withdrawing life‐sustaining treatments. This concerns mainly patients over 80, with many comorbidities. The decision‐making process of these decisions in emergency departments has not been extensively studied, especially for noncommunicating patients. Aim: The purpose of this study is to describe the decision‐making process of withholding and withdrawing life‐sustaining treatments in emergency departments for noncommunicating patients and the outcome of said patients. Design We conducted a prospective multicenter study in three emergency departments of university hospitals from September 2015 to January 2017. Results: We included 109 patients in the study. Fifty‐eight (53.2%) patients were coming from nursing homes and 52 (47.7%) patients had dementia. Decisions of withholding life‐sustaining treatment concerned 93 patients (85.3%) and were more frequent when a surrogate decision maker was present 61 (65.6%) versus seven (43.8%) patients. The most relevant factors that lead to these decisions were previous functional limitation (71.6%) and age (69.7%). Decision was taken by two physicians for 80 patients (73.4%). The nursing staff and general practitioner were, respectively, involved in 31 (28.4%) and two (1.8%) patients. A majority of the patients had no advance directives (89.9%), and the relatives were implicated in the decision‐making process for 96 patients (88.1%). Death in emergency departments occurred for 47 patients (43.1%), and after 21 days, 84 patients (77.1 %) died. Conclusion: There is little anticipation in end‐of‐life decisions. Discussion with patients concerning their end‐of‐life wishes and the writing of advance directives, especially for patients with chronic diseases, must be encouraged early. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]