Search

In the elicitation of decision makers' fuzzy and uncertain assessments, linguistic terms are natural and efficient as the preference modeling tools. Although the linguistic variables are available, they would not be operational without any detailed quantification. Motivated by the flexibility of information granularity, this paper develops information granules to represent linguistic terms in the form of intervals and interval type-2 fuzzy sets (IT2FSs) in best worst method (BWM). The development is aimed at minimizing inconsistency in the decision making (DM) process to ensure the rationality of the assessments provided by decision makers. Furthermore, the input and output based consistencies of BWM are considered. The granulation of entries of pairwise comparison vectors are the foundation of BWM to formulate an optimization problem where particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm serves as the optimization framework. Both individual and group decision making (GDM) scenarios are taken into consideration. For the GDM process, a performance index for measuring the group consensus is also proposed. Several examples and validity analysis are covered to illustrate the major ideas of this study. Finally, as a case study, a recommendation of the sequence of visiting tourist attractions in Wuhan and the corresponding comparative analysis are represented. • A granular computing-based method in BWM framework is proposed. • Construction of granular linguistic information to represent preference information of DMs is given. • A novel Euclidean distance function to measure the agreement among the group is proposed. • A case study of scenic spots recommendation in Wuhan with online reviews is exhibited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In group decision-making processes, decision makers may have different risk preference types, which usually make them take various responses to the same problem. In minimum cost consensus problems, risk seekers, risk neutrals and risk averters may exhibit individual cost adjustment characteristics, which require aggregating their opinions in a model. To solve this problem, this paper presents a minimum cost consensus model to obtain group consensus preferences using a general optimization model, which can handle three types of risk preferences in decision making. In addition, a data-driven weighting scheme for the degrees of importance of decision makers is developed, and a generalized group consensus opinion aggregation function is designed. The proposed group consensus opinion aggregation function extends the existing developed opinion production method, which is more compatible than other aggregation functions. Finally, the proposed minimum cost consensus with risk preferences model is verified through an illustrative example. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Social network group decision-making (SNGDM) develops rapidly because of the popularity of online connections among experts. The current SNGDM studies mainly focus on the influence of trust on the evolution of consensus opinions through a complex process. Some situations are ignored in the existing research when trust may negatively affect the decision-making process and trust relationships may be developed or interrupted during consensus negotiation processes. To overcome such limitations, we propose a consensus model based on the trust-consensus multiplex network by combing trust social network analysis and consensus evolution networks (CENs). We design an interaction mechanism between trust and consensus based on the dynamic experts’ influence which is computed by the multiplex PageRank centrality measure, especially focusing on the negative impact of trust on consensus. Besides, we compute consensus levels based on the density and intensity of CENs to determine when should the negotiation end. The proposed model can not only consider the mutual influence between trust and consensus in SNGDM, but also detect and analyze the negative influence of trust on consensus. An example examines the effectiveness of the proposed model and a comparative analysis shows its flexibility for studying the complex consensus situation of SNGDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In large-scale group decision making (LSGDM), appropriate clustering analysis is important to consensus reaching since it can reduce the interactive complexity among individuals. According to the traditional clustering method, a conflict may arise between the consensus reaching levels and total adjustment costs within clusters when individuals have different unit adjustment cost, which reflects their willingness to make concessions. Since this conflict may aggravate the consensus complexity, we propose a new $K$ -means clustering method that considers both preferences and the preference adjustment cost. The preference adjustment cost is attached to preferences with a parameter that can be determined by balancing this conflict. Because of such conflict, the proposed clustering algorithm can improve the similarity of intracluster individuals on the preference adjustment cost by offsetting some acceptable consensus reaching levels within clusters. According to the proposed clustering algorithm, individuals who have both similar preferences and adjustment willingness are classified into the same clusters. In this way, the moderator can provide similar compensation strategies for intracluster individuals, which will decrease the adjustment complexity. A practical case study of team construction examines the application of the proposed algorithm, and the related comparative analysis shows that it is convenient for managers to persuade individuals to reach a consensus under the improved clustering results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In most existing linguistic distribution multiple criteria group decision-making (MCGDM) models, the sample size of group linguistic distribution assessment (LDA) is often neglected, and the decision makers are viewed to be independent. The probabilistic distribution is closely related to the sample size, and there exist more or fewer interference effects among different individual opinions. Thus, this article develops a quantum framework for modeling interference effects in the linguistic distribution MCGDM process. First, considering the sample size information, we redefine the LDAs and provide a new computational model for them. Second, to integrate a series of LDAs, the linguistic distribution weighted averaging (LDWA) operator is presented. Mathematic proofs reveal that the new LDWA operator can not only ensure the information integrality but also can avoid the conjunctive and disjunctive operations. Third, to explore the interference effects among individual opinions, a quantum framework is constructed. In this process, individual opinions are viewed as various wave functions occurring synchronously. They interfere with each and influence the aggregation result. Finally, an illustrative example of Internet finance soft power evaluation is provided to verify the effectiveness. Sensitivity and comparative analyses are also implemented to assess the stability and validity of our method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ranking of fuzzy numbers (FNs) is a key stage within fuzzy multicriteria decision analysis (FMCDA). However, the influence of FNs dependence on their ranking, including ranking alternatives within FMCDA, has not been studied yet. In this article, for studying such an influence, the widely used defuzzification-based fuzzy ranking methods, centroid index, and integral of means, along with their modifications, which are pairwise comparison defuzzification ranking methods, are explored. The authors argue that classical defuzzification ranking methods are intended to deal with independent FNs, whereas their modifications may be used for ranking of dependent FNs. It is provided a proof in which, pairwise comparison Yuan’s and defuzzification integral of means ranking methods, are equivalent when ordering independent and can differ when ordering dependent FNs; at the same time, Yuan’s and modified integral of means ranking methods are equivalent when ordering both independent and dependent FNs. Intransitivity of the two modified ranking methods when ordering dependent FNs as well as intransitivity of alternatives in FMCDA for fuzzy multiattribute value theory (FMAVT) as an example is proved. The distinctions in ranking of dependent FNs by all ranking methods under consideration are explored through ordering alternatives within FMAVT. For this, a real-life case study is considered, and the distinctions in ordering alternatives by classical and modified ranking methods are demonstrated. Statistical analysis of distinctions in ordering alternatives by FMAVT with different ranking methods is implemented with the use of Monte–Carlo simulation. The significance of distinctions for the choice and ranking multicriteria problems, as well as for justification of utilizing ranking methods under consideration in FMCDA, is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we propose the concept of flexible linguistic preference relations (FLPRs), in which the flexible linguistic expressions, a more flexible way to form linguistic expressions, are employed. Further, we present a method to rank alternatives based on preference information in FLPRs by exploring the linguistic distribution (LD) and priority-based approximation (PA) of FLPRs. In the LD-based approximation, we first present a two-stage optimization process to approximate FLPRs to distribution linguistic preference relations (DLPRs) following the principles of minimum preference loss and maximum consistency. Then in the PA process, we derive priority vectors from the DLPRs with some desired properties. Finally, a comparative analysis of the priority vectors derived from different kinds of linguistic preference relations is presented to illustrate our proposal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) solution is usually based on the clustering analysis process (CAP) and consensus reaching process (CRP). However, CAP and CRP can be contradictory since CAP is performed based on the differences between potentially small groups and CRP is conducted to improve the overall similarity of a large group. To balance CAP and CRP, a dynamic clustering analysis process (DCAP) based on consensus evolution networks is proposed. A clustering algorithm proposed based on community detection method can be used to handle the diverse network structures with dynamic consensus thresholds. The clustering validity based on the intracluster consensus levels in subgroups and the intercluster consensus level among subgroups is evaluated. Then, the DCAP after each feedback adjustment round in CRP is reanalyzed. In such a way, effective clustering can also be found after a satisfying consensus is reached. Finally, a case study shows the availability of this approach and comparative analyses are provided to highlight the advantages from both theoretical and numerical perspectives. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this article, we deal with an improved fusion method for multigranular linguistic distribution assessments, a flexible and practical expression, in a multiple criteria group decision-making problem, which permits an accurate transformation between two linguistic labels without the loss of information. The importance degree of decision makers is allocated on the basis of individual consistency elicited from evaluation assessments represented by linguistic distributions, which is described with the aid of the proposed dominance degree of linguistic distribution. To intuitively reflect the group consensus level, a new measure, Jaccard consensus of linguistic distribution, is introduced. Based on this, a consensus-based multicriteria group preference analysis model with multigranular linguistic distribution information is established within a unified framework, which is developed by means of additive multiattribute value utility theory. Furthermore, a corresponding algorithm is matched to obtain a representative value function for decision analysis and an illustrative example is developed to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Various linguistic expressions have been presented to model the flexibility of linguistic preference expressions and to support the consensus reaching in linguistic group decision-making (GDM). In this paper, we propose the concept of flexible linguistic expressions (FLEs) as a general linguistic preference expression format to improve the flexibility of the construction of complex linguistic expressions and the elicitation of linguistic preferences and, then, we develop a new linguistic GDM model with FLEs, referred to as FLE-based GDM (FLEGDM). In the FLEGDM, an FLE aggregation process with accurate constraints is developed to improve the quality (i.e., accuracy) of the collective result as well as guarantee the principle of minimum preference-loss through a mixed 0–1 linear programming model. Meanwhile, the consensus rules with minimum preference-loss are designed to support the consensus reaching process (CRS) in the FLEGDM. Finally, we present the detailed comparative analysis involving different linguistic GDM models to show the advantages of the FLEGDM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of uncertainty in decision-making problems remains a very challenging and timely research issue despite many proposals. An interesting topic in this area in recent years has been Granular Computing. In this paper, we present a coherent framework for various models of information granules, using hierarchies of information for dealing with knowledge acquired and processed at different levels of abstraction. Granular Computing, a paradigm for handling higher types of uncertainty in decision analysis, is considered a new conceptual and algorithmic asset of decision-making studies and, in particular, data-driven decision-making. Most relevant studies have focused on categories of information granules, namely intervals, fuzzy sets, rough sets, and shadowed sets. To better understand this promising area, this study provides a comprehensive overview of Granular Computing for decision-making through literature analysis, enhancing a variety of extensions, applications, and challenges. • We propose a comprehensive review for granular computing in decision making. • We provide a bibliometric review for granular computing in decision making. • We review main applications in granular computing in decision making. • We provide some future directions for granular computing in decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this work, we propose some two-layer preference models that can be appropriately applied in management problems such as the group decision making about predicting the future market share of certain product. By introducing the convex IOWA operator paradigm and some related properties and definitions, we list some detailed preference and inducing preference models to demonstrate and exemplify the proposed conceptual frame of two-layer preference model. The convex IOWA operator paradigm facilitates the modeling process and, from mathematical view, makes it stricter. When relevant inducing information and aggregation selection change, the proposed models can be easily adapted to accommodate more different applications in decision making and evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplier selection is a key issue in supply chain management, which directly impacts the manufacturer's performance. The problem can be viewed as a multiple attribute group decision making (MAGDM) that concerns many conflicting evaluation attributes, both being of qualitative and quantitative nature. Due to the increasing complexity and uncertainty of socio-economic environment, some evaluations of attributes are not adequately represented by numerical assessments and type-1 fuzzy sets. In this paper, we develop some linear programming models with the aid of multidimensional analysis of preference (LINMAP) method to solve interval type-2 fuzzy MAGDM problems, in which the information about attribute weights is incompletely known, and all pairwise comparison judgments over alternatives are represented by IT2FSs. First, we introduce a new distance measure based on the centroid interval between the IT2FSs. Then, we construct the linear programming model to determine the interval type-2 fuzzy positive ideal solution (IT2PIS) and corresponding attributes weight vector. Based on it, an extended LINMAP method to solve MAGDM problem under IT2FSs environment is developed. Finally, a supplier selection example is provided to demonstrate the usefulness of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, we investigate the multiple-attribute decision-making (MADM) problems based on traditional Maclaurin symmetric mean operator operating under hesitant fuzzy environment. The Maclaurin symmetric mean (MSM) operator is a classical mean type aggregation operator and has strong modeling capability in modern information fusion theory, which has particular advantages for aggregating multi-dimension arguments. The prominent characteristic of the MSM operator is that it can capture the interrelationship among the multi-input arguments. Motivated by the idea of MSM operator, we develop the hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean (HFMSM) operator for aggregating the hesitant fuzzy information. Some desirable properties such as monotonicity, boundedness, idempotency are studied. Furthermore, we have discussed some special cases with respect to different parameter values of the HFMSM operator in detail. For the situations where the input arguments have different importance, we further develop the weighted hesitant fuzzy Maclaurin symmetric mean operator to aggregate hesitant fuzzy information. Based on which, an approach to MADM problems with hesitant fuzzy information is developed. Finally, a practical example with paper quality evaluation of sciencepaper online in China is provided to illustrate the practicality and effectiveness of the proposed method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In most existing multi-criteria group decision making (MCGDM) problems, the decision makers (DMs) are usually regarded as independent and DMs' psychological behaviors are rarely considered. However, in many cases, the opinions of DMs are likely to influence each other and the DMs often hold subjective bounded rationality in the decision making process. To address this issue, a linguistic distribution behavioral MCGDM model integrating extended generalized TODIM (an acronym in Portuguese of interactive and multi-criteria decision making) method and quantum decision theory is developed. First, linguistic distribution assessments considering the sample size information are used to gather the group linguistic evaluations, which can integrally depict the quantitative distribution and qualitative vagueness. Second, an extended generalized linguistic distribution TODIM method is presented to reflect the DMs' bounded rational behaviors. It is used to calculate the dominance of each alternative. Third, a quantum possibilistic aggregation framework is constructed to explore the interference effects among DMs' opinions. In this process, DMs' opinions are viewed as synchronously occurred wave functions that interfere with each other and influence the aggregated result. Finally, a case study is examined to recommend the optimal automobile for customers based on distributed online reviews in newcar.xcar.com and autohome.com. Three separate scenarios with conjunctive, neural, and disjunctive modes are considered respectively. The sensitivity analysis is given to show the effect of risk factors and interference factors. The parameters show to be dominant in the final best automobile recommendation. The comparisons with some existing methods confirm the validity and stability of the proposed MCGDM method. • Develop a novel linguistic distribution behavioral MCGDM model. • Integrate the generalized TODIM method and quantum decision theory. • Explore the interference effects among DMs' opinions in a quantum framework. • Apply the proposed model to the online automobile recommendation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]