Search

Background: Non-motor symptoms, including depression and cognitive impairment, are common in essential tremor (ET), but associations between these symptoms and tremor are poorly understood., Methods: A retrospective, single-institution, cohort study evaluated 140 patients with ET undergoing evaluation for deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. The Fahn-Tolosa-Marin (FTM) or Washington Heights-Inwood Genetic Study of ET (WHIGET) scale was used to grade tremor. Tremor scores were divided into quartiles. Patients underwent clinical neuropsychological evaluations that included a comprehensive cognitive test battery and Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Subgroup analysis was performed with groups who met criteria for depression (BDI-II > 14) or overall cognitive impairment (<9th percentile on at least two dissimilar cognitive tests). Independent samples t-tests were used for continuous variables and chi square tests for categorical variables. Univariable and multivariable regressions were used to determine relationships between tremor and non-motor scores., Results: Tremor quartile was correlated with language domain performance (p = 0.044) but not depression scores. FTM score was associated with BDI-II (β = 0.940, p = 0.010), language (β = -0.936, p = 0.012), and visuospatial domain (β = -0.836, p = 0.025) scores, such that worse tremor was associated with more depression and worse language and visuospatial function. WHIGET score was not associated with any neuropsychological scores on multivariable regression., Conclusion: FTM score was associated with language, visuospatial, and mood symptoms, suggesting a relationship between the severity of these symptom types. Different tremor scores capture different motor symptoms and relationships with nonmotor symptoms., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPI) deep brain stimulation (DBS) effectively treat motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) but may be associated with cognitive and psychiatric changes in some patients. Evaluation of changes in cognitive and psychiatric symptoms following DBS is complicated by changes in these symptoms that occur as part of the natural disease course. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether electrode position was associated with changes in neurocognitive symptoms in patients who underwent STN and GPI DBS., Methods: A single-institution retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with PD who underwent DBS from 2008 to 2019. Cognitive and psychiatric outcomes included Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) score, presence of impulsive-compulsive behavior (ICB), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score, and overall cognitive status grade determined by comprehensive neuropsychology testing (normal, mild impairment, moderate impairment, and dementia). Pre- and postoperative comparisons were performed using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test or paired t-test. Patients with and without cognitive decline were compared using a Mann-Whitney U-test or unpaired t-test. A chi-square test was used for categorical comparisons., Results: One hundred thirty patients were included (mean age 62.5 ± 7.9 years). At a mean postoperative follow-up from DBS of 13.0 ± 12.7 (range 6-66) months, there was an improvement in ICB (26.3% preoperatively vs 15.0% postoperatively, p = 0.017), but a decline in MMSE score (28.6 ± 1.6 vs 27.6 ± 2.0, p < 0.001) and overall cognitive status (normal: 66.2% vs 39.2%; mild: 12.3% vs 17.7%; moderate: 21.5% vs 33.1%; dementia: 0.0% vs 10.0%; p < 0.001). Patients undergoing STN DBS had a worse decline in overall cognitive status than patients who underwent GPI DBS (p = 0.006). Postoperative cognitive decline was associated with a more medial electrode position only for patients who underwent STN DBS., Conclusions: Cognitive change was observed in some patients with PD who underwent both GPI and STN DBS, likely due partly to underlying disease progression. Compared with GPI DBS, STN DBS was associated with a greater likelihood of cognitive decline. In STN but not GPI DBS, cognitive decline was associated with medialized electrode position, suggesting modulation of nonmotor STN divisions may contribute to cognitive changes following STN DBS.

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy for Parkinson's disease (PD), but disparities exist in access to DBS along gender, racial, and socioeconomic lines., Summary: Women are underrepresented in clinical trials and less likely to undergo DBS compared to their male counterparts. Racial and ethnic minorities are also less likely to undergo DBS procedures, even when controlling for disease severity and other demographic factors. These disparities can have significant impacts on patients' access to care, quality of life, and ability to manage their debilitating movement disorders., Key Messages: Addressing these disparities requires increasing patient awareness and education, minimizing barriers to equitable access, and implementing diversity and inclusion initiatives within the healthcare system. In this systematic review, we first review literature discussing gender, racial, and socioeconomic disparities in DBS access and then propose several patient, provider, community, and national-level interventions to improve DBS access for all populations., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: Despite the known benefits of deep brain stimulation (DBS), the cost of the procedure can limit access and can vary widely. Our aim was to conduct a systematic review of the reported costs associated with DBS, as well as the variability in reporting cost-associated factors to ultimately increase patient access to this therapy., Methods: A systematic review of the literature for cost of DBS treatment was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed and Embase databases were queried. Olsen & Associates (OANDA) was used to convert all reported rates to USD. Cost was corrected for inflation using the US Bureau of Labor Statistics Inflation Calculator, correcting to April 2022., Results: Twenty-six articles on the cost of DBS surgery from 2001 to 2021 were included. The median number of patients across studies was 193, the mean reported age was 60.5 ± 5.6 years, and median female prevalence was 38.9%. The inflation- and currency-adjusted mean cost of the DBS device was USD 21,496.07 ± USD 8,944.16, the cost of surgery alone was USD 14,685.22 ± USD 8,479.66, the total cost of surgery was USD 40,942.85 ± USD 17,987.43, and the total cost of treatment until 1 year of follow-up was USD 47,632.27 ± USD 23,067.08. There were no differences in costs observed across surgical indication or country., Conclusion: Our report describes the large variation in DBS costs and the manner of reporting costs. The current lack of standardization impedes productive discourse as comparisons are hindered by both geographic and chronological variations. Emphasis should be put on standardized reporting and analysis of reimbursement costs to better assess the variability of DBS-associated costs in order to make this procedure more cost-effective and address areas for improvement to increase patient access to DBS., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is commonly performed with patients awake to perform intraoperative microelectrode recordings and/or macrostimulation testing to guide final electrode placement. Supplemental information from atlas-based databases derived from prior patient data and visualised as efficacy heat maps transformed and overlaid onto preoperative MRIs can be used to guide preoperative target planning and intraoperative final positioning. Our quantitative analysis of intraoperative testing and corresponding changes made to final electrode positioning aims to highlight the value of intraoperative neurophysiological testing paired with image-based data to optimise final electrode positioning in a large patient cohort., Methods: Data from 451 patients with movement disorders treated with 822 individual DBS leads at a single institution from 2011 to 2021 were included. Atlas-based data was used to guide surgical targeting. Intraoperative testing data and coordinate data were retrospectively obtained from a large patient database. Medical records were reviewed to obtain active contact usage and neurologist-defined outcomes at 1 year., Results: Microelectrode recording firing profiles differ per track, per target and inform the locations where macrostimulation testing is performed. Macrostimulation performance correlates with the final electrode track chosen. Centroids of atlas-based efficacy heat maps per target were close in proximity to and may predict active contact usage at 1 year. Overall, patient outcomes at 1 year were improved for patients with better macrostimulation response., Conclusions: Atlas-based imaging data is beneficial for target planning and intraoperative guidance, and in conjunction with intraoperative neurophysiological testing during awake DBS can be used to individualize and optimise final electrode positioning, resulting in favourable outcomes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: Some of the technology described in this article has been licensed by Vanderbilt University to FHC, Inc. which distributes it under the name WayPoint Navigator. BD receives royalties for this license. PK has a fiduciary relationship with NeuroTargeting, LLC, but has not received financial compensation in the 5 years prior to this article., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Essential tremor (ET) and Parkinson's disease (PD) are the most common tremor disorders and are common indications for deep brain stimulation (DBS). In some patients, PD and ET symptoms overlap and diagnosis can be challenging based on clinical criteria alone. The objective of this study was to identify structural brain differences between PD and ET DBS patients to help differentiate these disorders and improve our understanding of the different brain regions involved in these pathologic processes., Methods: We included ET and PD patients scheduled to undergo DBS surgery in this observational study. Patients underwent 3T brain MRI while under general anesthesia as part of their procedure. Cortical thicknesses and subcortical volumes were quantified from T1-weighted images using automated multi-atlas segmentation. We used logistic regression analysis to identify brain regions associated with diagnosis of ET or PD., Results: 149 ET and 265 PD patients were included. Smaller volumes in the pallidum and thalamus and reduced thickness in the anterior orbital gyrus, lateral orbital gyrus, and medial precentral gyrus were associated with greater odds of ET diagnosis. Conversely, reduced volumes in the caudate, amygdala, putamen, and basal forebrain, and reduced thickness in the orbital part of the inferior frontal gyrus, supramarginal gyrus, and posterior cingulate were associated with greater odds of PD diagnosis., Conclusions: These findings identify structural brain differences between PD and ET patients. These results expand our understanding of the different brain regions involved in these disorders and suggest that structural MRI may help to differentiate patients with these two disorders., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Despite advances in the treatment of psychiatric diseases, currently available therapies do not provide sufficient and durable relief for as many as 30-40% of patients. Neuromodulation, including deep brain stimulation (DBS), has emerged as a potential therapy for persistent disabling disease, however it has not yet gained widespread adoption. In 2016, the American Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (ASSFN) convened a meeting with leaders in the field to discuss a roadmap for the path forward. A follow-up meeting in 2022 aimed to review the current state of the field and to identify critical barriers and milestones for progress., Design: The ASSFN convened a meeting on June 3, 2022 in Atlanta, Georgia and included leaders from the fields of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry along with colleagues from industry, government, ethics, and law. The goal was to review the current state of the field, assess for advances or setbacks in the interim six years, and suggest a future path forward. The participants focused on five areas of interest: interdisciplinary engagement, regulatory pathways and trial design, disease biomarkers, ethics of psychiatric surgery, and resource allocation/prioritization. The proceedings are summarized here., Conclusion: The field of surgical psychiatry has made significant progress since our last expert meeting. Although weakness and threats to the development of novel surgical therapies exist, the identified strengths and opportunities promise to move the field through methodically rigorous and biologically-based approaches. The experts agree that ethics, law, patient engagement, and multidisciplinary teams will be critical to any potential growth in this area., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests. Sarah Bick receives funding from the Neurosurgery Research and Career Development Program (K12 NS080223) and consulting honoraria from Varian Medical Systems. Rafael Carbunaru owns stock options and is an employee of Boston Scientific, a manufacturer of DBS devices. Jennifer Chandler receives funding from CIHR (Canadian Institutes of Health Research) through the ERANET-Neuron program. Binith Cheeran owns stock options and is an employee of Abbott, a manufacturer of DBS devices. Rachel Davis receives consulting honoraria from Medtronic and speaker fees from Baylor for an OCD conference. Darin Dougherty's research has been funded by the International OCD Foundation, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, National Institute of Mental Health, Tiny Blue Dot Foundation and Medtronic; he has received honoraria and consultation fees from Medtronic, Sage, and Celanese and has equity in Neurable, Innercosmos, and Intrinsic Powers. Ashley Feinsinger receives funding from the NIH (RF1MH121373 and UH3NS103442), received honoraria for her work on the NIH Neuroethics Workgroup, she is on an advisory board of Vivani Medical Products (Orion Early Feasibility Study), and she is on the data safety monitoring board of R01 MH122431. Kelly Foote reported grants from the National Institutes of Health during the conduct of the study; nonfinancial support from Medtronic (donation of closed-loop DBS devices) outside the submitted work; and grants from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, and Functional Neuromodulation outside the submitted work. Wayne Goodman receives funding from NIH (UH3NS100459), the McNair Foundation, and Biohaven. WG receives royalties from Nview, LLC and OCDscales, LLC as well as consulting honoraria from Biohaven. Aysegul Gunduz receives investigational device donations from Medtronic under the NIH BRAIN Public-Private Partnership agreements, and her research is funded by NIH grants UH3NS095553, R01NS096008, UH3NS119844. Casey Halpern has patents related to sensing and brain stimulation for the treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders, and he works as a consultant for Boston Scientific Neuromodulation and Insightec. Brian Kopell has received consulting honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic. Cynthia Kubu receives grant funding from the NIH (5RO1MH114853, 5RC1NS068086, 3RF1MH123407-01S1) and participates on the data safety monitoring boards for studies investigating the use of DBS for pain (UHS3 BRIAN/UH3 HEAL, 3UH3NS113661). She is the president of the Society for Clinical Neuropsychology. Sarah Lisanby receives funding from the NIMH (1ZIAMH002955) and has a role on the Scientific Advisory Boards of the Aalto University School of Science and the German Center for Brain Stimulation. Cameron McIntyre is a paid consultant for Boston Scientific Neuromodulation, receives royalties from Hologram Consultants, Neuros Medical, Qr8 Health, and is a shareholder in the following companies: Hologram Consultants, Surgical Information Sciences, BrainDynamics, CereGate, Autonomic Technologies, Cardionomic, Enspire DBS. Michael Okun serves as Medical Advisor for the Parkinson's Foundation, and has received research grants from NIH, Parkinson's Foundation, the Michael J. Fox Foundation, the Parkinson Alliance, Smallwood Foundation, the Bachmann-Strauss Foundation, the Tourette Syndrome Association, and the UF Foundation. Michael Okun's research is supported by: NIHR01 NR014852, R01NS096008, UH3NS119844, U01NS119562. Michael Okun is PI of the NIH R25NS108939 Training Grant. Michael Okun has received royalties for publications with Demos, Manson, Amazon, Smashwords, Books4Patients, Perseus, Robert Rose, Oxford and Cambridge (movement disorders books). Nader Pouratian receives research funding from NIH (R24 MH114796, UH3 NS103442, UH3 NS103549, R01 NS097782, UH3 NS113661, R01 GM135420, RF1 MH121373), consulting/presentation honoraria from Abbott, Sensoria Therapeutics, Boston Scientific, and BrainLab. Nader Pouratian is on an advisory board at Abbott Laboratories and has leadership positions in the Congress of Neurological Surgeons and American Society of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. Robert Raike owns stock options and is an employee of Medtronic, a manufacturer of DBS devices. Patricio Riva-Posse has received honoraria for consulting for Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Abbott Neuromodulation, and LivaNova. Sameer Sheth received funding from the McNair Foundation for this work. SS receives consulting honoraria from Boston Scientific, Neuropace, Zimmer Biomet, and Koh Young. Nora Vanegas-Arroyave receives research funding from NIH and the Michael J. Fox foundation. Alik Widge has received honoraria for consulting for Abbott, he has received device donations from Medtronic, and he has unlicensed patents in the area of deep brain stimulation., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Our aim is to review several recent landmark studies discussing the application of advanced neuroimaging to guide target selection in deep brain stimulation (DBS) for psychiatric disorders., Materials and Methods: We performed a PubMed literature search of articles related to psychiatric neurosurgery, DBS, diffusion tensor imaging, probabilistic tractography, functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and blood oxygen level-dependent activation. Relevant articles were included in the review., Results: Recent advances in neuroimaging, namely the use of diffusion tensor imaging, probabilistic tractography, functional MRI, and positron emission tomography have provided higher resolution depictions of structural and functional connectivity between regions of interest. Applying these imaging modalities to DBS has increased understanding of the mechanism of action of DBS from the single structure to network level, allowed for new DBS targets to be discovered, and allowed for individualized DBS targeting for psychiatric indications., Conclusions: Advanced neuroimaging techniques may be especially important to guide personalized DBS targeting in psychiatric disorders such as treatment-resistant depression and obsessive-compulsive disorder where symptom profiles and underlying disordered circuitry are more heterogeneous. These articles suggest that advanced imaging can help to further individualize and optimize DBS, a promising next step in improving its efficacy., (Copyright © 2021 International Neuromodulation Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Neuromodulation is a promising treatment modality for disorders of learning and memory, offering the possibility of precise alteration of disordered neural circuits. Studies to date have failed to identify an optimal target and stimulation paradigm. Six epilepsy patients with depth electrodes implanted for seizure localization participated in our study. We recorded local field potentials from implanted electrodes while subjects participated in an associative learning task requiring them to learn an association between presented images and a button press. Three subjects participated in stimulation sessions during which caudate or putamen stimulation was delivered for some images during feedback after correct responses. Caudate stimulation enhanced learning. Both caudate and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex demonstrated a beta power increase during the feedback period of the learning task that was greater following correct than incorrect trials. In dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, this difference increased with learning and persisted beyond the end of the feedback period. Caudate stimulation was associated with increased dorsolateral prefrontal cortex beta power following feedback. These findings suggest that temporally specific caudate stimulation is a promising neuromodulation strategy to improve learning in disorders of learning and memory., (© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a small almond-shaped subcortical structure classically known for its role in motor inhibition through the indirect pathway within the basal ganglia. Little is known about the role of the STN in mediating cognitive functions in humans. Here, we explore the role of the STN in human subjects making decisions under conditions of uncertainty using single-neuron recordings and intermittent deep brain stimulation (DBS) during a financial decision-making task. Intraoperative single-neuronal data from the STN reveals that on high-uncertainty trials, spiking activity encodes the upcoming decision within a brief (500 ms) temporal window during the choice period, prior to the manifestation of the choice. Application of intermittent DBS selectively prior to the choice period alters decisions and biases subject behavior towards conservative wagers., Competing Interests: SP, TH, SS, MM, SB, JY, AF, AW, DD, EE No competing interests declared, MF Senior editor, eLife, (© 2018, Patel et al.)

Objectives: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) improves motor symptoms in advanced Parkinson's disease. STN DBS may also affect emotion, possibly by impacting a parallel limbic cortico-striatal circuit. The objective of this study was to investigate changes in prefrontal cortical activity related to DBS during an emotion induction task., Materials and Methods: We used near infrared spectroscopy to monitor prefrontal cortex hemodynamic changes during an emotion induction task. Seven DBS patients were tested sequentially in the stimulation-on and stimulation-off states while on dopaminergic medication. Patients watched a series of positive, negative, and neutral videos. The general linear model was used to compare prefrontal oxygenated hemoglobin concentration between DBS states., Results: Deep brain stimulation was correlated with prefrontal oxygenated hemoglobin changes relative to the stimulation off state in response to both positive and negative videos. These changes were specific to emotional stimuli and were not seen during neutral stimuli., Conclusions: These results suggest that STN stimulation influences the prefrontal cortical representation of positive and negative emotion induction., (© 2016 International Neuromodulation Society.)

Disorders of learning and memory have a large social and economic impact in today's society. Unfortunately, existing medical treatments have shown limited clinical efficacy or potential for modification of the disease course. Deep brain stimulation is a successful treatment for movement disorders and has shown promise in a variety of other diseases including psychiatric disorders. The authors review the potential of neuromodulation for the treatment of disorders of learning and memory. They briefly discuss learning circuitry and its involvement in Alzheimer disease and traumatic brain injury. They then review the literature supporting various targets for neuromodulation to improve memory in animals and humans. Multiple targets including entorhinal cortex, fornix, nucleus basalis of Meynert, basal ganglia, and pedunculopontine nucleus have shown a promising potential for improving dysfunctional memory by mechanisms such as altering firing patterns in neuronal networks underlying memory and increasing synaptic plasticity and neurogenesis. Significant work remains to be done to translate these findings into durable clinical therapies.