Search

Objectives: To investigate the feasibility of low-radiation dose and low iodinated contrast medium (ICM) dose protocol combining low-tube voltage and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) algorithm in thin-slice abdominal CT., Methods: This prospective study included 148 patients who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT with either 120-kVp (600 mgL/kg, n = 74) or 80-kVp protocol (360 mgL/kg, n = 74). The 120-kVp images were reconstructed using hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) (120-kVp-HIR), while 80-kVp images were reconstructed using HIR (80-kVp-HIR) and DLR (80-kVp-DLR) with 0.5 mm thickness. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) and iodine dose were compared between protocols. Image noise, CT attenuation, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. Noise power spectrum (NPS) and edge rise slope (ERS) were used to evaluate noise texture and edge sharpness, respectively. The subjective image quality was rated on a 4-point scale., Results: SSDE and iodine doses of 80-kVp were 40.4% (8.1 ± 0.9 vs. 13.6 ± 2.7 mGy) and 36.3% (21.2 ± 3.9 vs. 33.3 ± 4.3 gL) lower, respectively, than those of 120-kVp (both, p < 0.001). CT attenuation of vessels and solid organs was higher in 80-kVp than in 120-kVp images (all, p < 0.001). Image noise of 80-kVp-HIR and 80-kVp-DLR was higher and lower, respectively than that of 120-kVp-HIR (both p < 0.001). The highest CNR and subjective scores were attained in 80-kVp-DLR (all, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in average NPS frequency and ERS between 120-kVp-HIR and 80-kVp-DLR (p ≥ 0.38)., Conclusion: Compared with the 120-kVp-HIR protocol, the combined use of 80-kVp and DLR techniques yielded superior subjective and objective image quality with reduced radiation and ICM doses at thin-section abdominal CT., Clinical Relevance Statement: Scanning at low-tube voltage (80-kVp) combined with the deep-learning reconstruction algorithm may enhance diagnostic efficiency and patient safety by improving image quality and reducing radiation and contrast doses of thin-slice abdominal CT., Key Points: Reducing radiation and iodine doses is desirable; however, contrast and noise degradation can be detrimental. The 80-kVp scan with the deep-learning reconstruction technique provided better images with lower radiation and contrast doses. This technique may be efficient for improving diagnostic confidence and patient safety in thin-slice abdominal CT., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the utility of the combined use of 3D wheel sampling and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for intracranial high-resolution (HR)-time-of-flight (TOF)-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T., Methods: This prospective study enrolled 20 patients who underwent head MRI at 3 T, including TOF-MRA. We used 3D wheel sampling called "fast 3D" and DLR for HR-TOF-MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.59 × 0.5 mm 3 ) in addition to conventional MRA (spatial resolution, 0.39 × 0.89 × 1 mm 3 ). We compared contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio between the blood vessels (basilar artery and anterior cerebral artery) and brain parenchyma, full width at half maximum in the P3 segment of the posterior cerebral artery among 3 protocols. Two board-certified radiologists evaluated noise, contrast, sharpness, artifact, and overall image quality of 3 protocols., Results: The contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio of fast 3D-HR-MRA with DLR are comparable or higher than those of conventional MRA and fast 3D-HR-MRA without DLR. The full width at half maximum was significantly lower in fast 3D-MRA with and without DLR than in conventional MRA ( P = 0.006, P < 0.001). In qualitative evaluation, fast 3D-MRA with DLR had significantly higher sharpness and overall image quality than conventional MRA and fast 3D-MRA without DLR (sharpness: P = 0.021, P = 0.001; overall image quality: P = 0.029, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: The combination of 3D wheel sampling and DLR can improve visualization of arteries in intracranial TOF-MRA., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which leverages k-space data, on the image quality of lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) bone imaging using a 3D multi-echo in-phase sequence., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, 29 patients who underwent lumbar spine MRI, including an MR bone imaging sequence between January and April 2023, were analyzed. Images were reconstructed with and without SR-DLR (Matrix sizes: 960 × 960 and 320 × 320, respectively). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the vertebral body and spinal canal and the contrast and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the vertebral body and spinal canal were quantitatively evaluated. Furthermore, the slope at half-peak points of the profile curve drawn across the posterior border of the vertebral body was calculated. Two radiologists independently assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, sharpness, and overall image quality of both image types using a 4-point scale. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using weighted kappa coefficients, and quantitative and qualitative scores were compared via the Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: SNRs of the vertebral body and spinal canal were notably improved in images with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Contrast and CNR were significantly enhanced with SR-DLR compared to those without SR-DLR (p = 0.023 and p = 0.022, respectively). The slope of the profile curve at half-peak points across the posterior border of the vertebral body and spinal canal was markedly higher with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Qualitative scores (noise: p < 0.001, contrast: p < 0.001, artifact p = 0.042, sharpness: p < 0.001, overall image quality: p < 0.001) were superior in images with SR-DLR compared to those without. Kappa analysis indicated moderate to good agreement (noise: κ = 0.56, contrast: κ = 0.51, artifact: κ = 0.46, sharpness: κ = 0.76, overall image quality: κ = 0.44)., Conclusion: SR-DLR, which is based on k-space data, has the potential to enhance the image quality of lumbar spine MR bone imaging utilizing a 3D gradient echo in-phase sequence., Clinical Relevance Statement: The application of SR-DLR can lead to improvements in lumbar spine MR bone imaging quality., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: We aimed to evaluate the effect of deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) on high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted fast asymmetric spin-echo (HR-3D T2-FASE) imaging in the preoperative evaluation of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) tumors., Methods: This study included 13 consecutive patients who underwent preoperative HR-3D T2-FASE imaging using a 3 T MRI scanner. The reconstruction voxel size of HR-3D T2-FASE imaging was 0.23 × 0.23 × 0.5 mm. The contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) of the structures were compared between HR-3D T2-FASE images with and without DLR. The observers' preferences based on four categories on the tumor side on HR-3D T2-FASE images were evaluated. The facial nerve in relation to the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images was assessed with reference to intraoperative findings., Results: The mean CNR between the tumor and trigeminal nerve and between the cerebrospinal fluid and trigeminal nerve was significantly higher for DLR images than non-DLR-based images (14.3 ± 8.9 vs. 12.0 ± 7.6, and 66.4 ± 12.0 vs. 53.9 ± 8.5, P < 0.001, respectively). The observer's preference for the depiction and delineation of the tumor, cranial nerves, vessels, and location relation on DLR HR-3D T2FASE images was superior to that on non-DLR HR-3D T2FASE images in 7 (54%), 6 (46%), 6 (46%), and 6 (46%) of 13 cases, respectively. The facial nerves around the tumor on HR-3D T2-FASE images were visualized accurately in five (38%) cases with DLR and in four (31%) without DLR., Conclusion: DLR HR-3D T2-FASE imaging is useful for the preoperative assessment of CPA tumors., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The advent of Deep Learning (DL) has significantly propelled the field of diagnostic radiology forward by enhancing image analysis and interpretation. The introduction of the Transformer architecture, followed by the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), has further revolutionized this domain. LLMs now possess the potential to automate and refine the radiology workflow, extending from report generation to assistance in diagnostics and patient care. The integration of multimodal technology with LLMs could potentially leapfrog these applications to unprecedented levels.However, LLMs come with unresolved challenges such as information hallucinations and biases, which can affect clinical reliability. Despite these issues, the legislative and guideline frameworks have yet to catch up with technological advancements. Radiologists must acquire a thorough understanding of these technologies to leverage LLMs' potential to the fullest while maintaining medical safety and ethics. This review aims to aid in that endeavor., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which uses k-space properties, on image quality of intracranial time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T., Methods: This retrospective study involved 35 patients who underwent intracranial TOF-MRA using a 3-T MRI system with SR-DLR based on k-space properties in October and November 2022. We reconstructed MRA with SR-DLR (matrix = 1008 × 1008) and MRA without SR-DLR (matrix = 336 × 336). We measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the basilar artery (BA) and the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and the sharpness of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) using the slope of the signal intensity profile curve at the half-peak points. Two radiologists evaluated image noise, artifacts, contrast, sharpness, and overall image quality of the two image types using a 4-point scale. We compared quantitative and qualitative scores between images with and without SR-DLR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test., Results: The SNRs, contrasts, and CNRs were all significantly higher in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The slope was significantly greater in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The qualitative scores in MRAs with SR-DLR were all significantly higher than MRAs without SR-DLR (p < 0.001)., Conclusion: SR-DLR with k-space properties can offer the benefits of increased spatial resolution without the associated drawbacks of longer scan times and reduced SNR and CNR in intracranial MRA., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Purpose: This study aimed to predict contrast effects in cardiac computed tomography (CT) from CT localizer radiographs using a deep learning (DL) model and to compare the prediction performance of the DL model with that of conventional models based on patients' physical size., Methods: This retrospective study included 473 (256 men and 217 women) cardiac CT scans between May 2014 and August 2017. We developed and evaluated DL models that predict milligrams of iodine per enhancement of the aorta from CT localizer radiographs. To assess the model performance, we calculated and compared Pearson correlation coefficient ( r ) between the actual iodine dose that was necessary to obtain a contrast effect of 1 HU (iodine dose per contrast effect [IDCE]) and IDCE predicted by DL, body weight, lean body weight, and body surface area of patients., Results: The model was tested on 52 cases for the male group (mean [SD] age, 63.7 ± 11.4) and 44 cases for the female group (mean [SD] age, 69.8 ± 11.6). Correlation coefficients between the actual and predicted IDCE were 0.607 for the male group and 0.412 for the female group, which were higher than the correlation coefficients between the actual IDCE and body weight (0.539 for male, 0.290 for female), lean body weight (0.563 for male, 0.352 for female), and body surface area (0.587 for male, 0.349 for female)., Conclusions: The performance for predicting contrast effects by analyzing CT localizer radiographs with the DL model was at least comparable with conventional methods using the patient's body size, notwithstanding that no additional measurements other than CT localizer radiographs were required., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the effect of super-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) on the image quality of coronary CT angiography (CCTA)., Methods: Forty-one patients who underwent CCTA using a 320-row scanner were retrospectively included. Images were reconstructed with hybrid (HIR), model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR), normal-resolution deep-learning-based reconstruction (NR-DLR), and SR-DLR algorithms. For each image series, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) at the left main trunk, right coronary artery, left anterior descending artery, and left circumflex artery were quantified. Blooming artifacts from calcified plaques were measured. Image sharpness, noise magnitude, noise texture, edge smoothness, overall quality, and delineation of the coronary wall, calcified and noncalcified plaques, cardiac muscle, and valves were subjectively ranked on a 4-point scale (1, worst; 4, best). The quantitative parameters and subjective scores were compared among the four reconstructions. Task-based image quality was assessed with a physical evaluation phantom. The detectability index for the objects simulating the coronary lumen, calcified plaques, and noncalcified plaques was calculated from the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF)., Results: SR-DLR yielded significantly lower image noise and blooming artifacts with higher CNR than HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR (all p < 0.001). The best subjective scores for all the evaluation criteria were attained with SR-DLR, with significant differences from all other reconstructions (p < 0.001). In the phantom study, SR-DLR provided the highest NPS average frequency, TTF 50% , and detectability for all task objects., Conclusion: SR-DLR considerably improved the subjective and objective image qualities and object detectability of CCTA relative to HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR algorithms., Clinical Relevance Statement: The novel SR-DLR algorithm has the potential to facilitate accurate assessment of coronary artery disease on CCTA by providing excellent image quality in terms of spatial resolution, noise characteristics, and object detectability., Key Points: • SR-DLR designed for CCTA improved image sharpness, noise property, and delineation of cardiac structures with reduced blooming artifacts from calcified plaques relative to HIR, MBIR, and NR-DLR. • In the task-based image-quality assessments, SR-DLR yielded better spatial resolution, noise property, and detectability for objects simulating the coronary lumen, coronary calcifications, and noncalcified plaques than other reconstruction techniques. • The image reconstruction times of SR-DLR were shorter than those of MBIR, potentially serving as a novel standard-of-care reconstruction technique for CCTA performed on a 320-row CT scanner., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Objectives: To evaluate the image quality of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) within a single breath-hold (BH) at 3 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Methods: This retrospective study included 32 patients with biliary and pancreatic disorders. BH images were reconstructed with and without DLR. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between the common bile duct (CBD) and periductal tissues, and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of CBD on 3D-MRCP were evaluated quantitatively. Two radiologists scored image noise, contrast, artifacts, blur, and overall image quality of the three image types using a 4-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative scores were compared using the Friedman test and post hoc Nemenyi test., Results: The SNR and CNR were not significantly different when under respiratory gating- and BH-MRCP without DLR. However, they were significantly higher under BH with DLR than under respiratory gating (SNR, p = 0.013; CNR, p = 0.027). The contrast and FWHM of MRCP under BH with and without DLR were lower than those under respiratory gating (contrast, p < 0.001; FWHM, p = 0.015). Qualitative scores for noise, blur, and overall image quality were higher under BH with DLR than those under respiratory gating (blur, p = 0.003; overall, p = 0.008)., Conclusions: The combination of the 3D hybrid profile order technique and DLR is useful for MRCP within a single BH and does not lead to the deterioration of image quality and space resolution at 3 T MRI., Clinical Relevance Statement: Considering its advantages, this sequence might become the standard protocol for MRCP in clinical practice, at least at 3.0 T., Key Points: • The 3D hybrid profile order can achieve MRCP within a single breath-hold without a decrease in spatial resolution. • The DLR significantly improved the CNR and SNR of BH-MRCP. • The 3D hybrid profile order technique with DLR reduces the deterioration of image quality in MRCP within a single breath-hold., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) for cardiac computed tomography (CT) have shown great potential in enhancing diagnosis and prognosis prediction in patients with cardiovascular disease. Deep learning, a type of machine learning, has revolutionized radiology by enabling automatic feature extraction and learning from large datasets, particularly in image-based applications. Thus, AI-driven techniques have enabled a faster analysis of cardiac CT examinations than when they are analyzed by humans, while maintaining reproducibility. However, further research and validation are required to fully assess the diagnostic performance, radiation dose-reduction capabilities, and clinical correctness of these AI-driven techniques in cardiac CT. This review article presents recent advances of AI in the field of cardiac CT, including deep-learning-based image reconstruction, coronary artery motion correction, automatic calcium scoring, automatic epicardial fat measurement, coronary artery stenosis diagnosis, fractional flow reserve prediction, and prognosis prediction, analyzes current limitations of these techniques and discusses future challenges., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Yusuke Matsui received a grant and a lecturer’s fee from Canon Medical Systems outside this work. The other authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Although there is no solid agreement for artificial intelligence (AI), it refers to a computer system with intelligence similar to that of humans. Deep learning appeared in 2006, and more than 10 years have passed since the third AI boom was triggered by improvements in computing power, algorithm development, and the use of big data. In recent years, the application and development of AI technology in the medical field have intensified internationally. There is no doubt that AI will be used in clinical practice to assist in diagnostic imaging in the future. In qualitative diagnosis, it is desirable to develop an explainable AI that at least represents the basis of the diagnostic process. However, it must be kept in mind that AI is a physician-assistant system, and the final decision should be made by the physician while understanding the limitations of AI. The aim of this article is to review the application of AI technology in diagnostic imaging from PubMed database while particularly focusing on diagnostic imaging in thorax such as lesion detection and qualitative diagnosis in order to help radiologists and clinicians to become more familiar with AI in thorax., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To compare the noise power spectrum (NPS) properties and perform a qualitative analysis of hybrid iterative reconstruction (IR), model-based IR (MBIR), and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) at a similar noise level in clinical study and compare these outcomes with those in phantom study., Methods: A Catphan phantom with an external body ring was used in the phantom study. In the clinical study, computed tomography (CT) examination data of 34 patients were reviewed. NPS was calculated from DLR, hybrid IR, and MBIR images. The noise magnitude ratio (NMR) and the central frequency ratio (CFR) were calculated from DLR, hybrid IR, and MBIR images relative to filtered back-projection images using NPS. Clinical images were independently reviewed by two radiologists., Results: In the phantom study, DLR with a mild level had a similar noise level as hybrid IR and MBIR with strong levels. In the clinical study, DLR with a mild level had a similar noise level as hybrid IR with standard and MBIR with strong levels. The NMR and CFR were 0.40 and 0.76 for DLR, 0.42 and 0.55 for hybrid IR, and 0.48 and 0.62 for MBIR. The visual inspection of the clinical DLR image was superior to that of the hybrid IR and MBIR images., Conclusion: Deep learning-based reconstruction improves overall image quality with substantial noise reduction while maintaining image noise texture compared with the CT reconstruction techniques., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The application of machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) in radiology has expanded exponentially. In recent years, an extremely large number of studies have reported about the hepatobiliary domain. Its applications range from differential diagnosis to the diagnosis of tumor invasion and prediction of treatment response and prognosis. Moreover, it has been utilized to improve the image quality of DL reconstruction. However, most clinicians are not familiar with ML and DL, and previous studies about these concepts are relatively challenging to understand. In this review article, we aimed to explain the concepts behind ML and DL and to summarize recent achievements in their use in the hepatobiliary region.

Objective: For compressed sensing (CS) to become widely used in routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it is essential to improve image quality. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of combining CS and deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) for various sequences in shoulder MRI., Methods: This retrospective study included 37 consecutive patients who underwent undersampled shoulder MRIs, including T1-weighted (T1WI), T2-weighted (T2WI), and fat-saturation T2-weighted (FS-T2WI) images. Images were reconstructed using the conventional wavelet-based denoising method (wavelet method) and a combination of wavelet and DLR-based denoising methods (hybrid-DLR method) for each sequence. The signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio of the bone, muscle, and fat and the full width at half maximum of the shoulder joint were compared between the 2 image types. In addition, 2 board-certified radiologists scored the image noise, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality of the 2 image types on a 4-point scale., Results: The signal-to-noise ratios and contrast-to-noise ratios of the bone, muscle, and fat in T1WI, T2WI, and FS-T2WI obtained from the hybrid-DLR method were significantly higher than those of the conventional wavelet method ( P < 0.001). However, there were no significant differences in the full width at half maximum of the shoulder joint in any of the sequences ( P > 0.05). Furthermore, in all sequences, the mean scores of the image noise, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality were significantly higher in the hybrid-DLR method than in the wavelet method ( P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in contrast among the sequences ( P > 0.05)., Conclusions: The DLR denoising method can improve the image quality of CS in T1-weighted images, T2-weighted images, and fat-saturation T2-weighted images of the shoulder compared with the wavelet denoising method alone., Competing Interests: Y.Y. is an employee of Canon Japan. The other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale and Objectives: To evaluate the image properties of lung-specialized deep-learning-based reconstruction (DLR) and its applicability in ultralow-dose CT (ULDCT) relative to hybrid- (HIR) and model-based iterative-reconstructions (MBIR)., Materials and Methods: An anthropomorphic chest phantom was scanned on a 320-row scanner at 50-mA (low-dose-CT 1 [LDCT-1]), 25-mA (LDCT-2), and 10-mA (ULDCT). LDCT were reconstructed with HIR; ULDCT images were reconstructed with HIR (ULDCT-HIR), MBIR (ULDCT-MBIR), and DLR (ULDCT-DLR). Image noise and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. With the LDCT images as reference standards, ULDCT image qualities were subjectively scored on a 5-point scale (1 = substantially inferior to LDCT-2, 3 = comparable to LDCT-2, 5 = comparable to LDCT-1). For task-based image quality analyses, a physical evaluation phantom was scanned at seven doses to achieve the noise levels equivalent to chest phantom; noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were evaluated. Clinical ULDCT (10-mA) images obtained in 14 nonobese patients were reconstructed with HIR, MBIR, and DLR; the subjective acceptability was ranked., Results: Image noise was lower and CNR was higher in ULDCT-DLR and ULDCT-MBIR than in LDCT-1, LDCT-2, and ULDCT-HIR (p < 0.01). The overall quality of ULDCT-DLR was higher than of ULDCT-HIR and ULDCT-MBIR (p < 0.01), and almost comparable with that of LDCT-2 (mean score: 3.4 ± 0.5). DLR yielded the highest NPS peak frequency and TTF 50% for high-contrast object. In clinical ULDCT images, the subjective acceptability of DLR was higher than of HIR and MBIR (p < 0.01)., Conclusion: DLR optimized for lung CT improves image quality and provides possible greater dose optimization opportunity than HIR and MBIR., (Copyright © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

BACKGROUND. Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) may facilitate CT radiation dose reduction, but a paucity of literature has compared lower-dose DLR images with standard-dose iterative reconstruction (IR) images or explored application of DLR to low-tube-voltage scanning in children. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to assess whether DLR can be used to reduce radiation dose while maintaining diagnostic image quality in comparison with hybrid IR (HIR) and model-based IR (MBIR) for low-tube-voltage pediatric CT. METHODS. This retrospective study included children 6 years old or younger who underwent contrast-enhanced 80-kVp CT with a standard-dose or lower-dose protocol. Standard images were reconstructed with HIR, and lower-dose images were reconstructed with HIR, MBIR, and DLR. Size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) was calculated for both protocols. Image noise, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were quantified. Two radiologists independently evaluated noise magnitude, noise texture, streak artifact, edge sharpness, and overall quality. Interreader agreement was assessed, and mean values were calculated. To evaluate task-based object detection performance, a phantom was imaged with 80-kVp CT at six doses (SSDE, 0.6-5.3 mGy). Detectability index ( d ') was calculated from the noise power spectrum and task-based transfer function. Reconstruction methods were compared. RESULTS. Sixty-five children (mean age, 25.0 ± 25.2 months) who underwent CT with standard- ( n = 31) or lower-dose ( n = 34) protocol were included. SSDE was 54% lower for the lower-dose than for the standard-dose group (1.9 ± 0.4 vs 4.1 ± 0.8 mGy). Lower-dose DLR and MBIR yielded lower image noise and higher SNR and CNR than standard-dose HIR ( p < .05). Interobserver agreement on subjective features ranged from a kappa coefficient of 0.68 to 0.78. The readers subjectively scored noise texture, edge sharpness, and overall quality lower for lower-dose MBIR than for standard-dose HIR ( p < .001), though higher for lower-dose DLR than for standard-dose HIR ( p < .001). In the phantom, DLR provided higher d ' than HIR and MBIR at each dose. Object detectability was greater for 2.0-mGy DLR than for 4.0-mGy HIR for low-contrast (3.67 vs 3.57) and high-contrast (1.20 vs 1.04) objects. CONCLUSION. Compared with IR algorithms, DLR results in substantial dose reduction with preserved or even improved image quality for low-tube-voltage pediatric CT. CLINICAL IMPACT. Use of DLR at 80 kVp allows greater dose reduction for pediatric CT than do current IR techniques.

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined wavelet and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) method for under-sampled pituitary MRI., Methods: This retrospective study included 28 consecutive patients who underwent under-sampled pituitary T2-weighted images (T2WI). Images were reconstructed using either the conventional wavelet denoising method (wavelet method) or the wavelet and DLR methods combined (hybrid DLR method) at five denoising levels. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the CSF, hypothalamic, and pituitary images and the contrast between structures were compared between the two image types. Noise quality, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality were evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The quantitative and the qualitative analyses were performed with robust two-way repeated analyses of variance., Results: Using the hybrid DLR method, the SNR of the CSF progressively increased as denoising levels increased. By contrast, with the wavelet method, the SNR of the CSF, hypothalamus, and pituitary did not increase at higher denoising levels. There was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and denoising levels (p < 0.001), and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001). For all five qualitative scores, there was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The hybrid DLR method can provide higher image quality for T2WI of the pituitary with compressed sensing (CS) than the wavelet method alone, especially at higher denoising levels., Key Points: • The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid progressively increased with the hybrid DLR method, with an increase in the denoising level for cerebrospinal fluid in pituitary T2WI with CS. • The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid using the conventional wavelet method did not increase at higher denoising levels. • All qualitative scores of hybrid deep-learning reconstructions at all denoising levels were higher than those for the wavelet denoising method., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.)

Introduction: Deep learning approaches have shown high diagnostic performance in image classifications, such as differentiation of malignant tumors and calcified coronary plaque. However, it is unknown whether deep learning is useful for characterizing coronary plaques without the presence of calcification using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of deep learning with a convolutional neural network (CNN) with that of radiologists in the estimation of coronary plaques., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 178 patients (191 coronary plaques) who had undergone CCTA and integrated backscatter intravascular ultrasonography (IB-IVUS) studies. IB-IVUS diagnosed 81 fibrous and 110 fatty or fibro-fatty plaques. We manually captured vascular short-axis images of the coronary plaques as Portable Network Graphics (PNG) images (150 × 150 pixels). The display window level and width were 100 and 700 Hounsfield units (HU), respectively. The deep-learning system (CNN; GoogleNet Inception v3) was trained on 153 plaques; its performance was tested on 38 plaques. The area under the curve (AUC) obtained by receiver operating characteristic analysis of the deep learning system and by two board-certified radiologists was compared., Results: With the CNN, the AUC and the 95% confidence interval were 0.83 and 0.69-0.96, respectively; for radiologist 1 they were 0.61 and 0.42-0.80; for radiologist 2 they were 0.68 and 0.51-0.86, respectively. The AUC for CNN was significantly higher than for radiologists 1 (p = 0.04); for radiologist 2 it was not significantly different (p = 0.22)., Conclusion: DL-CNN performed comparably to radiologists for discrimination between fatty and fibro-fatty plaque on CCTA images., Implications for Practice: The diagnostic performance of the CNN and of two radiologists in the assessment of 191 ROIs on CT images of coronary plaques whose type corresponded with their IB-IVUS characterization was comparable., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement None., (Copyright © 2021 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Optimizing the CT acquisition parameters to obtain diagnostic image quality at the lowest possible radiation dose is crucial in the radiosensitive pediatric population. The image quality of low-dose CT can be severely degraded by increased image noise with filtered back projection (FBP) reconstruction. Iterative reconstruction (IR) techniques partially resolve the trade-off relationship between noise and radiation dose but still suffer from degraded noise texture and low-contrast detectability at considerably low-dose settings. Furthermore, sophisticated model-based IR usually requires a long reconstruction time, which restricts its clinical usability. With recent advances in artificial intelligence technology, deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) has been introduced to overcome the limitations of the FBP and IR approaches and is currently available clinically. DLR incorporates convolutional neural networks-which comprise multiple layers of mathematical equations-into the image reconstruction process to reduce image noise, improve spatial resolution, and preserve preferable noise texture in the CT images. For DLR development, numerous network parameters are iteratively optimized through an extensive learning process to discriminate true attenuation from noise by using low-dose training and high-dose teaching image data. After rigorous validations of network generalizability, the DLR engine can be used to generate high-quality images from low-dose projection data in a short reconstruction time in a clinical environment. Application of the DLR technique allows substantial dose reduction in pediatric CT performed for various clinical indications while preserving the diagnostic image quality. The authors present an overview of the basic concept, technical principles, and image characteristics of DLR and its clinical feasibility for low-dose pediatric CT. © RSNA, 2021.

Purpose: Deep learning-based reconstruction (DLR) has been developed to reduce image noise and increase the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of DLR for high spatial resolution (HR)-MR cisternography., Methods: This retrospective study included 35 patients who underwent HR-MR cisternography. The images were reconstructed with or without DLR. The SNRs of the CSF and pons, contrast of the CSF and pons, and sharpness of the normal-side trigeminal nerve using full width at half maximum (FWHM) were compared between the two image types. Noise quality, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality of these two types of images were qualitatively scored., Results: The SNRs of the CSF and pons were significantly higher with DLR than without DLR (CSF 21.81 ± 7.60 vs. 15.33 ± 4.03, p < 0.001; pons 5.96 ± 1.38 vs. 3.99 ± 0.48, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the contrast of the CSF and pons (p = 0.225) and sharpness of the normal-side trigeminal nerve using FWHM (p = 0.185) without and with DLR, respectively. Noise quality and the overall image quality were significantly higher with DLR than without DLR (noise quality 3.95 ± 0.19 vs. 2.53 ± 0.44, p < 0.001; overall image quality 3.97 ± 0.17 vs. 2.97 ± 0.12, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in sharpness (p = 0.371) and artifacts (p = 1) without and with DLR., Conclusion: DLR can improve the image quality of HR-MR cisternography by reducing image noise without sacrificing contrast or sharpness.

The application of machine learning and deep learning in the field of imaging is rapidly growing. Although the principles of machine and deep learning are unfamiliar to the majority of clinicians, the basics are not so complicated. One of the major issues is that commentaries written by experts are difficult to understand, and are not primarily written for clinicians. The purpose of this article was to describe the different concepts behind machine learning, radiomics, and deep learning to make clinicians more familiar with these techniques., (Copyright © 2020 Société française de radiologie. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To test whether our proposed denoising approach with deep learning-based reconstruction (dDLR) can effectively denoise brain MR images., Methods: In an initial experimental study, we obtained brain images from five volunteers and added different artificial noise levels. Denoising was applied to the modified images using a denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN), a shrinkage convolutional neural network (SCNN), and dDLR. Using these brain MR images, we compared the structural similarity (SSIM) index and peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) between the three denoising methods. Two neuroradiologists assessed the image quality of the three types of images. In the clinical study, we evaluated the denoising effect of dDLR in brain images with different levels of actual noise such as thermal noise. Specifically, we obtained 2D-T 2 -weighted image, 2D-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) and 3D-magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient echo (MPRAGE) from 15 healthy volunteers at two different settings for the number of image acquisitions (NAQ): NAQ2 and NAQ5. We reconstructed dDLR-processed NAQ2 from NAQ2, then compared with SSIM and PSNR. Two neuroradiologists separately assessed the image quality of NAQ5, NAQ2 and dDLR-NAQ2. Statistical analysis was performed in the experimental and clinical study. In the clinical study, the inter-observer agreement was also assessed., Results: In the experimental study, PSNR and SSIM for dDLR were statistically higher than those of DnCNN and SCNN (P < 0.001). The image quality of dDLR was also superior to DnCNN and SCNN. In the clinical study, dDLR-NAQ2 was significantly better than NAQ2 images for SSIM and PSNR in all three sequences (P < 0.05), except for PSNR in FLAIR. For all qualitative items, dDLR-NAQ2 had equivalent or better image quality than NAQ5, and superior quality to that of NAQ2 (P < 0.05), for all criteria except artifact. The inter-observer agreement ranged from substantial to near perfect., Conclusion: dDLR reduces image noise while preserving image quality on brain MR images.

Deep learning has been developed by computer scientists. Here, we discuss techniques for improving the image quality of diagnostic computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging with the aid of deep learning. We categorize the techniques for improving the image quality as "noise and artifact reduction", "super resolution" and "image acquisition and reconstruction". For each category, we present and outline the features of some studies.

The aim of this study was to generate virtual Magnetic resonance (MR) from computed tomography (CT) using conditional generative adversarial networks (cGAN). We selected examinations from 22 adults who obtained their CT and MR lumbar spine examinations. Overall, 4 examinations were used as test data, and 18 examinations were used as training data. A cGAN was trained to generate virtual MR images from the CT images using the corresponding MR images as targets. After training, the generated virtual MR images from test data in epochs 1, 10, 50, 100, 500, and 1000 were compared with the original ones using the mean square error (MSE) and structural similarity index (SSIM). Additionally, two radiologists also performed qualitative assessments. The MSE of the virtual MR images decreased as the epoch of the cGANs increased from the original CT images: 8876.7 ± 1192.9 (original CT), 1567.5 ± 433.9 (Epoch 1), 1242.4 ± 442.0 (Epoch 10), 1065.8 ± 478.1 (Epoch 50), 1276.1 ± 718.9 (Epoch 100), 1046.7 ± 488.2 (Epoch 500), and 1031.7 ± 400.0 (Epoch 1000). No considerable differences were observed in the qualitative evaluation between the virtual MR images and the original ones, except in the structure of the spinal canal. Virtual MR lumbar spine images using cGANs could be a feasible technique to generate near-MR images from CT without MR examinations for evaluation of the vertebral body and intervertebral disc. Virtual MR lumbar spine images using cGANs can offer virtual CT images with sufficient quality for attenuation correction for PET or dose planning in radiotherapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]