Search

Purpose: Assessment of glaucomatous damage in animal models is facilitated by rapid and accurate quantification of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axonal loss and morphologic change. However, manual assessment is extremely time- and labor-intensive. Here, we developed AxoNet 2.0, an automated deep learning (DL) tool that (i) counts normal-appearing RGC axons and (ii) quantifies their morphometry from light micrographs., Methods: A DL algorithm was trained to segment the axoplasm and myelin sheath of normal-appearing axons using manually-annotated rat optic nerve (ON) cross-sectional micrographs. Performance was quantified by various metrics (e.g., soft-Dice coefficient between predicted and ground-truth segmentations). We also quantified axon counts, axon density, and axon size distributions between hypertensive and control eyes and compared to literature reports., Results: AxoNet 2.0 performed very well when compared to manual annotations of rat ON (R2 = 0.92 for automated vs. manual counts, soft-Dice coefficient = 0.81 ± 0.02, mean absolute percentage error in axonal morphometric outcomes < 15%). AxoNet 2.0 also showed promise for generalization, performing well on other animal models (R2 = 0.97 between automated versus manual counts for mice and 0.98 for non-human primates). As expected, the algorithm detected decreased in axon density in hypertensive rat eyes (P ≪ 0.001) with preferential loss of large axons (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: AxoNet 2.0 provides a fast and nonsubjective tool to quantify both RGC axon counts and morphological features, thus assisting with assessing axonal damage in animal models of glaucomatous optic neuropathy., Translational Relevance: This deep learning approach will increase rigor of basic science studies designed to investigate RGC axon protection and regeneration.

In this work, we develop a robust, extensible tool to automatically and accurately count retinal ganglion cell axons in optic nerve (ON) tissue images from various animal models of glaucoma. We adapted deep learning to regress pixelwise axon count density estimates, which were then integrated over the image area to determine axon counts. The tool, termed AxoNet, was trained and evaluated using a dataset containing images of ON regions randomly selected from whole cross sections of both control and damaged rat ONs and manually annotated for axon count and location. This rat-trained network was then applied to a separate dataset of non-human primate (NHP) ON images. AxoNet was compared to two existing automated axon counting tools, AxonMaster and AxonJ, using both datasets. AxoNet outperformed the existing tools on both the rat and NHP ON datasets as judged by mean absolute error, R 2 values when regressing automated vs. manual counts, and Bland-Altman analysis. AxoNet does not rely on hand-crafted image features for axon recognition and is robust to variations in the extent of ON tissue damage, image quality, and species of mammal. Therefore, AxoNet is not species-specific and can be extended to quantify additional ON characteristics in glaucoma and potentially other neurodegenerative diseases.