Search

Background: Remote Monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is recommended in management of Atrial Fibrillation (AF), which is a recognized risk factor for thromboembolism. We tried to elucidate whether stroke incidence observed in a large, remotely monitored population was consistent with the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile., Methods: Data from 1650 patients [76% male, age 72 (63-68), CHA2DS2VASc score 3.0 (2.0-4.0)] enrolled during the HomeGuide study and monitored with a daily-transmission RM system providing automatic alerts for AF, were analysed. Of those, 25% had a pacemaker and 75% an implantable cardioverter defibrillator with or without cardiac resynchronization. Estimations of the expected thromboembolic events were based on the population CHA2DS2VASc score profile used in a computer-simulated Markov model., Results: Eight thromboembolic events were observed with a 4-year cumulative stroke rate of 0.8% (confidence interval, 0.4%-1.5%). Simulations returned from 18.7 to 17.1 expected events, depending on the AF duration assumed to trigger anticoagulation (one-sample log-rank p<0.03). During the study period, 681 (84%) AF episodes and 129 (16%) atrial tachycardias were detected in 291 patients (18%): 93% of episodes were detected remotely in 269 patients, 66% of whom had no history of AF. Medical interventions were necessary in 305 episodes, 85% of which were detected remotely. Reaction time was 1 (0-6) days for remotely-detected episodes and 33 (14-121) days for episodes detected in clinic (p<0.0001)., Conclusions: In a large CIED population followed remotely for up to 4years, the incidence of thromboembolic events was less than half the estimations based on the CHA2DS2VASc risk profile., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite the fact that magnetic resonance (MR)-conditional pacemaker and lead systems have been introduced more than 5 years ago, it is still not clear whether they have actually facilitated the access of pacemaker patients to this important diagnostic tool. Factors limiting MR scans in daily practice in patients with MR-conditional cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) systems may be related to organizational, cultural and sometimes legal aspects. The Really ProMRI registry is an ongoing survey designed to assess the annual rate of MR examinations in patients with MR-conditional implants, with either pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and to detect the main factors limiting MRI., Methods: The primary endpoint of the Really ProMRI registry is to assess the current access to MRI of patients with MR-conditional pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator systems during normal practice. Data in the literature reported a 17% annual incidence of medical conditions requiring MRI in CIED patients. The Really ProMRI registry has been designed to detect 4.5% absolute difference with an 80% statistical power, by recruiting 600 patients already implanted with MR-conditional CIED implant. Patients will be followed up for 1 year, during which they will be asked to refer any prescription, execution or denial of an MR examination by patient questionnaires and original source documents., Conclusion: The ongoing Really ProMRI registry will assess the actual rate of and factors limiting the access to MRI for patients with MR-conditional CIEDs.

Aims: Several trials demonstrated the life saving role of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The aim was to evaluate the clinical characteristics and 4-year outcome of consecutive patients treated in clinical practice by prophylactic ICD implantation on the basis of class I recommendations and up-to-date ICD programming., Methods and Results: IRIDE multi-center, prospective and observational study enrolled 604 consecutive patients (mean age: 66 ± 10 years) treated by ICD between 01/01/2006 and 30/06/2010. Main characteristics were similarly distributed among the inclusion criteria of MADIT II (24%), SCD-HeFT (24%), COMPANION (26%) and MADIT-CRT (18%) trials, while a small number of patients met the MUSTT and MADIT (7%) inclusion criteria. Single-chamber ICDs were implanted in 168 (28%) patients, dual-chamber in 167 (28%) and biventricular in 269 (43%) patients. ATP programming was activated in 546 (90%) patients. Overall survival and rate of appropriate ICD intervention by ATP and/or shock at 12-24-36-48 months of follow-up were 94%, 89%, 80%, 75% and 16%, 28%, 37% and 50%, respectively. No difference in mortality rate between the groups who received or did not receive appropriate ICD interventions was demonstrated (p=ns)., Conclusions: The IRIDE study confirms the effectiveness in real world practice of ICD implantation in patients at risk of SCD. The life saving role of ICD therapy increases as the duration of follow-up is prolonged and the survival benefit is similar in patients who received or did not receive appropriate device treatment, thus suggesting a beneficial effect of up-to-date device programming., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The performances of implantable cardioverter defibrillators and leads are important issues for healthcare providers and patients. In 2007 Sprint Fidelis leads were found to be associated with an increased failure rate and so the purpose of the study was to evaluate long-term mortality and clinical outcomes in patients implanted with Sprint Fidelis leads compared with Sprint Quattro leads., Design, Setting, Patients: 508 patients with Sprint Fidelis leads and 468 with Sprint Quattro leads were prospectively followed in 12 Italian cardiology centres., Main Outcome Measures: Information on hospitalisations and other clinical events were collected during scheduled and unscheduled hospital visits. Deaths were identified from medical records or via phone contacts with patients' family members or through the National Office of Vital Statistics., Results: Over a mean follow-up of 27±18 months 141 deaths occurred in the overall population. No death was observed in patients with diagnosed failing lead. Kaplan-Meier patient survival differed between the two lead groups (80±2% in Fidelis leads vs 70±4% in the Sprint Quattro leads at 4 years, p=0.002). Multivariate analyses showed that mortality was neither associated with lead type nor with diagnosed failed lead. The annual rate of lead failure was 1.8% patient-year for Fidelis leads and 0.2% for the Sprint Quattro leads., Conclusions: In our multicentre research, the clinical outcomes of patients with Fidelis leads differed from those of patients with Sprint Quattro leads. Nevertheless, neither mortality nor the combined endpoint of mortality and heart failure hospitalisations was associated with the lead type. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01007474.