Search

Transvenous lead failure associated with cardiac pacing and defibrillation remains an important clinical problem, with an estimated incidence between 1 to 2%. Oversensing of non-physiological signals usually precede lead impedance changes and may result in clinical compliations such as pacing inhibition and inappropriate shocks. Device based algorithms that identify non-physiological signals can be used in conjunction with remote monitoring to facilitate early diagnosis and management of lead failure and avoid serious adverse outcomes. This review highlights mechanisms of lead failure and proposes a diagnostic approach to suspected lead failure., Competing Interests: Disclosure None declared., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Idiopathic ventricular fibrillation (IVF) can be associated with undetected distinct conditions such as microstructural cardiomyopathic alterations (MiCM) or Purkinje (Purk) activities with structurally normal hearts., Objectives: This study sought to evaluate the characteristics of recurrent VF recorded on implantable defibrillator electrograms, associated with these substrates., Methods: This was a multicenter collaboration study. At 32 centers, we selected patients with an initial diagnosis of IVF and recurrent arrhythmia at follow-up without antiarrhythmic drugs, in whom mapping demonstrated Purk or MiCM substrate. We analyzed variables related to previous ectopy, sinus rate preceding VF, trigger, and initial VF cycle lengths. Logistic regression with cross validation was used to evaluate the performance of criteria to discriminate Purk or MiCM substrates., Results: Among 95 patients (35 women, age 35 ± 11 years) meeting the inclusion criteria, IVF was associated with MiCM in 41 and Purk in 54 patients. A total of 117 arrhythmia recurrences including 91% VF were recorded on defibrillator. Three variables were mostly discriminant. Sinus tachycardia (≤570 ms) was more frequent in MiCM (35.9% vs 13.4%, P = 0.014) whereas short-coupled (<350 ms) triggers were most frequent in Purk-related VF (95.5% vs 23.1%, P = 0.001), which also had shorter VFCLs (182 ± 15 ms vs 215 ± 24 ms, P < 0.001).The multivariable combination provided the highest prediction (accuracy = 0.93 ± 0.05, range 0.833-1.000), discriminating 81% of IVF substrates with a high probability (>80%). Ectopy were inconsistently present before VF., Conclusions: Characteristics of arrhythmia recurrences on implantable cardioverter- defibrillator provide phenotypic markers of the distinct and hidden substrates underlying IVF. These findings have significant clinical and genetic implications., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Haissaguerre has received grant support from Biosense Webster. Dr Marijon has received grant support and consulting fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Microport, Biotronik, and Zoll. Pr Gandjbakhch has received lecture fees from Biotronik; and consulting fees from Medtronic, Microport, and Abbott. Dr Tilz is a consultant for Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, and Abbott Medical; has received speaker honoraria from Boston Scientific, Biotronik, Biosense Webster, Abbott Medical, and Lifetech; and has received research grants from Abbott, Biosense Webster, and Lifetech. Dr Roten has received research grants from Medtronic, the Swiss National Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Immanuel and Ilse Straub Foundation, and the Sitem Insel Support Fund, all for work outside the submitted study; and has received speaker/consulting honoraria from Abbott and Medtronic. Dr Reichlin has receivedresearch grants from the Swiss National Science Foundation, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the Sitem Insel support funds, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, and Medtronic, all for work outside the submitted study; and has received speaker/consulting honoraria or travel support from Abbott/SJM, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, and Medtronic, all for work outside the submitted study. Support for his institution’s fellowship program from Abbott/SJM, Biosense-Webster, Biotronik, Boston-Scientific, and Medtronic for work outside the submitted study. Dr Sacher has receivedspeaking honorarium from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Biosense Webster; and equity from InHeart. Dr Nogami has received lecture fees from Abbott; and endowments from Medtronic. Dr Massoullié has received lecture fees from Boston Scientific, Biosense Webster, and Abbot. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) have become established in preventing sudden cardiac death, with some advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems, including a lower incidence of lead failures. Despite technological advancements, S-ICD carriers may suffer from significant complications, such as premature battery depletion (PBD), that led to an advisory for nearly 40 000 patients. This multicentre study evaluated the incidence of PBD in a large set of S-ICD patients., Methods and Results: Data from patients implanted with S-ICD models A209 and A219 between October 2012 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA were reviewed. Incidence and implications of PBD, defined as clinically observed sudden drop in battery longevity, were analysed and compared to PBD with the definition of battery depletion within 60 months. Prospectively collected clinical data were obtained retrospectively from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports. This registry is listed on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05713708). Of the 1112 S-ICD devices analysed, 547 (49.2%) were equipped with a potentially affected capacitor linked to PBD occurrence, currently under Food and Drug Administration advisory. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 [inter-quartile range (IQR) 24-63] months. Clinically suspected PBD was observed in 159 (29.1%) of cases, with a median time to generator removal or replacement of 65 (IQR 55-72) months, indicative of significant deviations from expected battery lifespan. Manufacturer confirmation of PBD was made in 91.7% of devices returned for analysis. No cases of PBD were observed in devices that were not under advisory., Conclusion: This manufacturer-independent analysis highlights a notable incidence of PBD in patients equipped with S-ICD models under advisory, and the rate of PBD in this study corresponds to the rate currently estimated by the manufacturer. To the best of our knowledge, this provides the largest contemporary peer-reviewed study cohort investigating the actual incidence of PBD in S-ICD patients. These findings emphasize the importance of post-market registries in collaboration between clinicians and the manufacturer to optimize safety and efficacy in S-ICD treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.W. reports having received lecture fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific and educational fees from Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson. J.L. and D.S. report having received lecture fees from Johnson & Johnson, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. A.S. reports having received lecture fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Johnson & Johnson. J.H.-L. reports having received educational fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, and Biotronik and speaker fees from Abbott. N.T.S. reports having received research funding from Abbott. N.B. reports having received an educational grant from Biotronik and speaker fees from Medtronic and Abbott, all outside this submitted work. A.B. reports having received consultant and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cook Medical, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Spectranetics/Philips. J.S. reports having received educational fees from Boston Scientific and Johnson & Johnson and lecture fees from Abbott. All other authors report nothing to declare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Aims: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (S-ICDs) offer potentially distinct advantages over transvenous defibrillator systems. Recent randomized trials showed significantly lower lead failure rates than transvenous ICD. Still, S-ICDs remain associated with the risk of inappropriate shocks (IAS). While previous studies have reported varying causes of IAS, this study explores a rare cause of IAS, referred to as 'sense-B-noise.' It was recently described in case series, but its incidence has not been studied in a large cohort of S-ICD patients., Methods and Results: We retrospectively reviewed data from patients implanted with S-ICD models 1010, A209, and A219 between October 2009 and July 2023 across nine centres in Europe and the USA. The analysis concentrated on determining the incidence and understanding the implications of sense-B-noise events. Sense-B-noise represents a rare manifestation of distinct electrogram abnormalities within the primary and alternate sensing vectors. Data were collected from medical records, device telemetry, and manufacturer reports for investigation. This registry is registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05713708). Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator devices of the 1158 patients were analysed. The median follow-up time for all patients was 46 (IQR 23-64) months. In 107 patients (9.2%) ≥1 IAS was observed during follow-up. Sense-B-noise failure was diagnosed in six (0.5 and 5.6% of all IAS) patients, in all patients, the diagnosis was made after an IAS episode. Median lead dwell time in the affected patients was 23 (2-70) months. To resolve the sense-B-noise defect, in three patients reprogramming to the secondary vector was undertaken, and two patients underwent system removal with subsequent S-ICD reimplantation due to low amplitude in the secondary vector. In one patient, the secondary vector was initially programmed, and subsequently, an S-ICD system exchange was performed due to T-wave-oversensing IAS episodes., Conclusion: This multicentre analysis' findings shed light on a rare but clinically highly significant adverse event in S-ICD therapy. To our knowledge, we provide the first systematic multicentre analysis investigating the incidence of sense-B-noise. Due to being difficult to diagnose and limited options for resolution, management of sense-B-noise is challenging. Complete system exchange may be the only option for some patients. Educating healthcare providers involved in S-ICD patient care is crucial for ensuring accurate diagnosis and effective management of sense-B-noise issues., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: J.W. reports having received lecture fees from Abbott and Boston Scientific and educational fees from Boston Scientific and Johnson&Johnson. J.L. and D.S. report having received lecture fees from Johnson&Johnson, Abbott, and Boston Scientific. A.S. reports having received lecture fees from Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, and Johnson&Johnson. J.H. reports having received educational fees from Boston Scientific, Medtronic, Abbott, and Biotronik and speaker fees from Abbott. N.S. reports having received research funding from Abbott. N.B. reports having received an educational grant from Biotronik and speaker fees from Medtronic and Abbott, all outside this submitted work. A.B. reports having received consultant and/or speaker fees from Abbott, Bayer Healthcare, Biosense Webster, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cook Medical, Daiichi Sankyo, Medtronic, Pfizer, and Spectranetics/Philips. J.S. reports having received educational fees from Boston Scientific and Johnson&Johnson and lecture fees from Abbott. All other authors report nothing to declare., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

Unlimited access to ECGs using an over-the-counter smartwatch constitutes a real revolution for our discipline, and the application is rapidly expanding to include patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) such as pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). CIEDs require periodic evaluation and adjustment by healthcare professionals. In addition, implanted patients often present with symptoms that may be related to their PMs or ICDs. An ECG smartwatch could reveal information about device functioning, confirm normal device function, or aid in the case of device troubleshooting. In this review, we delve into the available evidence surrounding smartwatches with ECG registration and their integration into the care of patients with implanted pacemakers and ICDs. We explore safety considerations and the benefits and limitations associated with these wearables, drawing on relevant studies and case series from our own experience. By analyzing the current landscape of this emerging technology, we aim to provide a comprehensive overview that facilitates informed decision-making for both healthcare professionals and patients.

Background: Pacemakers (PMs) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) increasingly automatically record and remotely transmit nonsustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT) episodes, which may reveal ventricular oversensing., Objectives: We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning algorithm that accurately classifies NSVT episodes transmitted by PMs and ICDs in order to lighten health care workload burden and improve patient safety., Methods: PMs or ICDs (Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN) from 4 French hospitals with ≥1 transmitted NSVT episode were split into 3 subgroups: training set, validation set, and test set. Each NSVT episode was labeled as either physiological or nonphysiological. Four machine learning algorithms-2DTF-CNN, 2D-DenseNet, 2DTF-VGG, and 1D-AgResNet-were developed using training and validation data sets. Accuracies of the classifiers were compared with an analysis of the remote monitoring team of the Bordeaux University Hospital using F2 scores (favoring sensitivity over predictive positive value) using an independent test set., Results: A total of 807 devices transmitted 10,471 NSVT recordings (82% ICD; 18% PM), of which 87 devices (10.8%) transmitted 544 NSVT recordings with nonphysiological signals. The classification by the remote monitoring team resulted in an F2 score of 0.932 (sensitivity 95%; specificity 99%) The 4 machine learning algorithms showed high and comparable F2 scores (2DTF-CNN: 0.914; 2D-DenseNet: 0.906; 2DTF-VGG: 0.863; 1D-AgResNet: 0.791), and only 1D-AgResNet had significantly different labeling from that of the remote monitoring team., Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms were accurate in detecting nonphysiological signals within electrograms transmitted by PMs and ICDs. An artificial intelligence approach may render remote monitoring less resourceful and improve patient safety., (Copyright © 2023 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Until recently, remote interrogation and reprogramming of therapeutic cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) have been virtually nonexistent owing to technical challenges and safety concerns. It could be extremely useful, in particular in case of emergencies, when patients live far from CIED professionals or during enforced physical distancing., Objective: We investigated the feasibility and safety of a custom solution for remote interrogation and reprogramming of CIEDs from various manufacturers in various clinically relevant situations., Methods: Our solution consists of remote controlling CIED programmers through screen capture and remote cursor control. In this multicenter feasibility study, the primary outcome was technical feasibility (% of success) and safety (absence of complication) of interrogation and reprogramming when indicated in clinically driven encounters., Results: A total of 115 remote interrogations were performed in 110 patients: within the hospital (n = 73), medium range (50-100 km; n = 22), and long range (>5000 km; n = 20). Implanted devices were pacemakers (n = 85) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (n = 25) from Abbott (N=13), Biotronik (n = 65), and MicroPort (n = 32). Patients were located in the outpatient clinic, cardiology department, radiology department (magnetic resonance imaging), operating room (per implantation), and intensive care unit. Teleworking was performed in 39 cases. Complete CIED interrogations succeeded in all patients with reprogramming in 56 of 115 sessions (49%). No clinical or technical complications occurred. The time lag for screen interaction was below 1 second., Conclusion: Remote interrogation and reprogramming of CIEDs are feasible and safe across disparate clinical contexts and distances. This strategy may enhance health care access and facilitate medical training, tele-expertise, and telework worldwide., (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Exactly two decades have elapsed since pacemakers first provided automatic remote monitoring. This innovation has been well received by patients. However, there is still a widely held perception that remote monitoring of pacemakers is non-essential, despite the very similar gains that are achieved compared with remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Reducing in-office evaluations and overall staff workload is important when these resources are stretched to their limits. The early detection ability provided by remote monitoring facilitates device management (extending battery longevity) and the ability to exercise vigilance over recalled components. Clinical complications, such as arrhythmic events, are also detected earlier. Remote monitoring has been shown to produce similar reductions in the risk of all-cause hospitalization and death for pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in a mega-cohort observational study. This review is an evidence-based plea for the recognition and systematic implementation of remote monitoring for pacemakers., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Heart Rhythm Society, the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on optimal implantable cardioverter-defibrillator programming recommends burst antitachycardia pacing (ATP) for the treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) up to high rates. The number of bursts is not specified, and treatment by ramps or low-energy shocks is not recommended., Objectives: We investigated the efficacy and safety of progressive therapies for VTs between 150 and 200 beats/min. After 3 failed bursts, we compared 3 ramps vs 3 bursts followed by a low-energy shock vs high-energy shock., Methods: Using remote monitoring, we included monomorphic VT episodes treated with ≥1 burst., Results: A total of 1126 VT episodes were included. A single burst was as likely to terminate VT between 150 and 200 beats/min as VT between 200 and 230 beats/min (63% vs 64%; P=.41), but was more likely to accelerate the latter (3.2% vs 0.25%; P<.01). For VT <200 beats/min, the likelihood of ATP success increased progressively (73% with 2 bursts, 78% with 3 bursts). Three additional bursts further increased VT termination to 89%, similar to the success rate with 3 additional ramps (88%; P=.17). Programming 6 bursts is associated with the probability of acceleration requiring shock of 6.6%. A low-energy first shock was less successful than a high-energy shock (66% vs 86%; P<.01) and more likely to accelerate VT (17% vs 0%; P<.01)., Conclusion: Programming up to 6 burst ATP therapies for VTs 150-200 beats/min can avoid implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks in most patients. Ramp ATP after failed bursts were similarly effective. Low-energy shocks are less effective and more arrhythmogenic than high-energy shocks., (Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Morphology algorithms are currently recommended as a standalone discriminator in single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). However, these proprietary algorithms differ in both design and nominal programming., Objective: To compare three different algorithms with nominal versus advanced programming in their ability to discriminate between ventricular (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT)., Methods: In nine European centers, VT and SVTs were collected from Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic dual- and triple-chamber ICDs via their respective remote monitoring portals. Percentage morphology matches were recorded for selected episodes which were classified as VT or SVT by means of atrioventricular comparison. The sensitivity and related specificity of each manufacturer discriminator was determined at various values of template match percentage from receiving operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis., Results: A total of 534 episodes were retained for the analysis. In ROC analyses, Abbott Far Field MD (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.91; P < .001) and Boston Scientific RhythmID (AUC: 0.95; P < .001) show higher AUC than Medtronic Wavelet (AUC: 0.81; P < .001) when tested for their ability to discriminate VT from SVT. At nominal % match threshold all devices provided high sensitivity in VT identification, (91%, 100%, and 90%, respectively, for Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic) but contrasted specificities in SVT discrimination (85%, 41%, and 62%, respectively). Abbott and Medtronic's nominal thresholds were similar to the optimal thresholds. Optimization of the % match threshold improved the Boston Scientific specificity to 79% without compromising the sensitivity., Conclusion: Proprietary morphology discriminators show important differences in their ability to discriminate SVT. How much this impact the overall discrimination process remains to be investigated., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) implantations are rapidly expanding. However, the subcutaneous detection and interpretation of cardiac signals in S-ICDs is much more challenging than by conventional devices. There is a complete paradigm shift in cardiac signal sensing with subcutaneous signal detection, leading in some cases to oversensing with restricted programming options., Objectives: The aim of this single-center study was to quantify and describe cases where recurring oversensing made the extraction of the device necessary., Methods: Consecutive patients (n = 108) implanted with an S-ICD in our tertiary referral hospital were considered for analysis. Clinical and remote monitoring data were analyzed., Results: The S-ICD had to be explanted in 6 of 108 implanted patients (5.6%) because of refractory oversensing issues: myopotential oversensing, P- or T-wave oversensing, rate-dependent left bundle branch block aberrancy during exercise with R-wave double counting, and R-wave amplitude decrease after ventricular tachycardia ablation leading to noise detection. Seventeen of 108 patients experienced oversensing (15.7%): 9 patients had at least 1 inappropriate charge without a shock (8.3%), 3 patients had at least 1 inappropriate shock (2.8%), and 5 patients had both episodes (4.6%)., Conclusion: So far, cardiologists have had to deal with transvenous ICD lead fractures, but signal oversensing without correcting programming option could be the equivalent weakness of S-ICDs, despite an adequate screening., (Copyright © 2019 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

SecureSense is an implantable cardioverter defibrillator algorithm that differentiates lead-related oversensing from ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation by continuous comparison between the near-field (NF) and the far-field (FF) electrogram. If lead noise is identified, inappropriate therapy is withheld. Undersensing on the FF channel could result in inappropriate inhibition of life-saving therapy. Thus, the device automatically switches SecureSense to passive mode if undersensing on the FF channel is suspected. We report here the first cases of inappropriate automatic SecureSense deactivation due to misdiagnosed FF undersensing in pacemaker-dependent patients. Physicians should be aware that SecureSense does not withhold an inappropriate therapy for sustained oversensing in pacemaker-dependent patients., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Introduction: Recognition of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead malfunction before occurrence of life threatening complications is crucial. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of remote monitoring associated or not with a lead noise alert for early detection of ICD lead failure., Methods: From October 2013 to April 2017, a median of 1,224 (578-1,958) ICD patients were remotely monitored with comprehensive analysis of all transmitted materials. ICD lead failure and subsequent device interventions were prospectively collected in patients with (RMLN) and without (RM) a lead noise alert (Abbott Secure Sense™ or Medtronic Lead Integrity Alert™) in their remote monitoring system., Results: During a follow-up of 4,457 patient years, 64 lead failures were diagnosed. Sixty-one (95%) of the diagnoses were made before any clinical complication occurred. Inappropriate shocks were delivered in only one patient of each group (3%), with an annual rate of 0.04%. All high voltage conductor failures were identified remotely by a dedicated impedance alert in 10 patients. Pace-sense component failures were correctly identified by a dedicated alert in 77% (17 of 22) of the RMLN group versus 25% (8 of 32) of the RM group (P = 0.002). The absence of a lead noise alert was associated with a 16-fold increase in the likelihood of initiating either a shock or ATP (OR: 16.0, 95% CI 1.8-143.3; P = 0.01)., Conclusion: ICD remote monitoring with systematic review of all transmitted data is associated with a very low rate of inappropriate shocks related to lead failure. Dedicated noise alerts further reduce inappropriate detection of ventricular arrhythmias., (© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Background: The subcutaneous implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (S-ICD) remains a new technology requiring accurate assessment of the various aspects of its functioning. Isolated cases of delayed sensing of ventricular arrhythmia have been described., Objective: The purpose of this multicenter study was to assess the quality of sensing during induced ventricular fibrillation (VF)., Methods: One hundred thirty-seven patients underwent induction of VF at the end of the S-ICD implantation., Results: VF induction was successful in 133 patients (97%). Mean time to first therapy was 16.2 ± 3.1 seconds, with a substantial range from 12.5 to 27.0 seconds. Four different detection profiles were arbitrarily defined: (1) optimal detection (n = 39 [29%]); (2) undersensing with moderate prolongation of time to therapy (<18 seconds; n = 68 [51%]); (3) undersensing with significant prolongation of the time to therapy (>18 seconds; n = 19 [14%]); and (4) absence of therapy or prolonged time to therapy related to noise oversensing (n = 7 [6%]). In some of the patients in the last group, despite induction of VF the initial counter was never filled, the device did not charge the capacitors, and the shock was not delivered because of a sustained diagnosis of noise (n = 5). A manual shock by the device or an external shock had to be delivered to restore the sinus rhythm., Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a marked sensing delay leading to prolonged time to therapy in a large number of S-ICD patients. A few worrisome cases of noise oversensing inhibiting the therapies were detected. These results support the need for systematic intraoperative defibrillation testing., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The SecureSense right ventricular (RV) lead noise discrimination algorithm is designed to detect lead fracture and other types of oversensing in order to decrease inappropriate therapy., Objective: We studied the real-life accuracy of the SecureSense algorithm in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) patients followed by remote monitoring across multiple centers., Methods: Across 3 French centers, we studied 486 patients with a St Jude Medical device who were followed by remote monitoring and who had the SecureSense algorithm activated. We reviewed ≤10 of the most recent remote monitoring-transmitted electrograms of nonsustained oversensing, RV lead noise, and ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation that received therapy., Results: SecureSense inhibited 22 inappropriate therapies (lead dysfunction in 10 cases, P-wave oversensing in 12 cases). A total of 57 patients (12%) sent ≥1 nonsustained oversensing episode (total of 393 episodes) with multiple etiologies: noise on the near-field channel (38%), oversensing of T waves during ventricular pacing (33%), oversensing of the sinus P wave (12%), and oversensing of the paced P wave (6%). Two episodes (0.5%) of nonsustained VT were undersensed by the far-field channel. Of 336 analyzed episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmia, 15 episodes (4%) in 4 patients were related to oversensing of intrinsic P waves in 11 episodes or oversensing of external noise due to electrical cautery for the remaining 4 episodes., Conclusion: Of ICD patients equipped with SecureSense, 12% developed episodes of oversensing. The SecureSense algorithm prevented inappropriate ICD therapies with accurate diagnosis of oversensing (caused by lead dysfunction or oversensing of physiological signals). P-wave oversensing in integrated bipolar leads, electrical cautery, and electromagnetic interference are prone to be missed by SecureSense., (Copyright © 2017 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)