1. Quality assessment of cardiac magnetic resonance myocardial scar imaging prior to ventricular arrhythmia ablation.
- Author
-
Shah R, Sharma A, Assis F, De Vasconcellos HD, Alugubelli N, Pandey P, Akhtar T, Gasperetti A, Zhou S, Halperin H, Zimmerman SL, Tandri H, and Kolandaivelu A
- Subjects
- Humans, Contrast Media, Cicatrix pathology, Gadolinium, Predictive Value of Tests, Magnetic Resonance Imaging methods, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine methods, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Defibrillators, Implantable
- Abstract
High-resolution scar characterization using late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-CMR) is useful for guiding ventricular arrhythmia (VA) treatment. However, imaging study quality may be degraded by breath-holding difficulties, arrhythmias, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). We evaluated the effect of image quality on left ventricle (LV) base to apex scar interpretation in pre-VA ablation LGE-CMR. 43 consecutive patients referred for VA ablation underwent gradient-recalled-echo LGE-CMR. In ICD patients (n = 24), wide-bandwidth inversion-recovery suppressed ICD artifacts. In non-ICD patients, single-shot steady-state free-precession LGE-CMR could also be performed to reduce respiratory motion/arrhythmia artifacts. Study quality was assessed for adequate/limited scar interpretation due to cardiac/respiratory motion artifacts, ICD-related artifacts, and image contrast. 28% of non-ICD patients had studies where image quality limited scar interpretation in at least one image compared to 71% of ICD patient studies (p = 0.012). A median of five image slices had limited quality per ICD patient study, compared to 0 images per non-ICD patient study. Poorer quality in ICD patients was largely due to motion-related artifacts (54% ICD vs 6% non-ICD studies, p = 0.001) as well as ICD-related image artifacts (25% of studies). In VA ablation patients with ICDs, conventional CMR protocols frequently have image slices with limited scar interpretation, which can limit whole-heart scar assessment. Motion artifacts contribute to suboptimal image quality, particularly in ICD patients. Improved methods for motion and ICD artifact suppression may better delineate high-resolution LGE scar features of interest for guiding VA ablation., (© 2022. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF