Search

This article describes the results of an educational intervention for family caregivers of persons in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. A total of 45 family caregivers participated in this intervention that consisted of five weekly educational sessions about the disease and aspects of caring for someone in the early stages. Measures of knowledge about Alzheimer's disease, self-efficacy, reactions to patients' memory impairment, and level of depression at pretest and posttest were analyzed. Participants' knowledge about the disease improved substantially, self-efficacy and reactions to patients' impairments improved moderately, and level of depression showed no significant improvement. Results suggest that this intervention has merit for family caregivers coping with the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. Implications for implementation and evaluation are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This exploratory study compared three methods of assessing dementia specific quality of life, corresponding to the perspectives of residents, staff members, and trained observers. Design and Methods: We collected data on 172 residents with dementia in four special care nursing facilities and three assisted living facilities. Analyses assessed the relationship of each quality-of-life method or perspective to the others and to resident characteristics such as cognitive and functional status. Results: The relationship of staff quality-of-life measures to resident characteristics varied by care setting while no significant relationships were found for resident quality-of-life measures. Staff and observational measures were moderately correlated in both settings. Moderate correlations of resident measures with staff and observational measures were found in the assisted living sample. Implications: Each perspective is relatively independent and somewhat unique. Measures that focus on specific aspects of quality of life may be more appropriate to use with assisted living residents than with residents of special care facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This exploratory study compared three methods of assessing dementia specific quality of life, corresponding to the perspectives of residents, staff members, and trained observers. Design and Methods: We collected data on 172 residents with dementia in four special care nursing facilities and three assisted living facilities. Analyses assessed the relationship of each quality-of-life method or perspective to the others and to resident characteristics such as cognitive and functional status. Results: The relationship of staff quality-of-life measures to resident characteristics varied by care setting while no significant relationships were found for resident quality-of-life measures. Staff and observational measures were moderately correlated in both settings. Moderate correlations of resident measures with staff and observational measures were found in the assisted living sample. Implications: Each perspective is relatively independent and somewhat unique. Measures that focus on specific aspects of quality of life may be more appropriate to use with assisted living residents than with residents of special care facilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated five dementia-specific quality of life (DQOL) measures including client interviews, staff proxies, and observations with 54 clients in three adult day centers. Also, the relationship of cognitive and functional status to each of the DQOL measures was assessed. Client interviews correlated well with each other, but not with other measures. Staff proxies were strongly correlated with each other and moderately correlated with the observational measure. On average, clients rated their DQOL higher than staff. Analyses suggest that functional impairment is associated with poorer DQOL as indicated by staff and observer measures. Possible explanations and implications are explored. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Introduction Dementia Care Mapping (DCM) was originally developed as a clinical tool but has attracted interest as a potential observational measure of quality of life (QOL) and well-being of long-term care residents with dementia. DCM coding involves continuous observation over a 6-h period, with observers recording a Behavior Category Code (BCC, a recording of activity/interaction) and a Well/Ill Being (WIB) score at 5 min intervals. Method Descriptive data from several different research teams on the distribution and psychometric properties of DCM data were compiled and summarized. Results Issues and problems identified include: complex scoring algorithms, inter-rater reliability of the BCCs, limited variability of WIB values, associations between resident characteristics and DCM assessments, rater time burden, and comparability of results across study settings. Conclusions Despite the identified limitations, DCM has promise as a research measure, as it may come closer to rating QOL from the perspective of persons with dementia than other available measures. Its utility will depend on the manner in which it is applied and an appreciation of the measure's strength and limitations. Possible changes that might improve the reliability, validity, and practicality of DCM as a research tool include coding the predominant event (rather than the ‘best’ event), shortening the observation period, and adding ‘0’ as a neutral WIB coding option. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]