Search

Journalists express support for providing a diversity of viewpoints in their reporting, but how is this reflected in their content? This study compared survey results of U.S. political journalists' statements with a content analysis of their reporting. There was limited support for journalists reflecting a diversity of viewpoints in their reporting, but only for those who support civic or direct models of democracy. Most journalists, however, relied heavily on elite sources. Those journalists who reported in surveys that they preferred independent sources, however, did include a greater diversity of viewpoints in their reporting. Results related to journalist trust in institutions are also discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Journalism is often discussed in terms of its relationship to democracy. But one's conception of democracy can influence how one understands journalistic concepts. This study surveyed 204 US political reporters to determine their views on democracy and how their views relate to professional roles, trust, and sourcing. The findings show journalists support traditional norms but differ in their support in interesting ways based on their conception of democracy. Broadly, journalists more strongly support civic and direct models of democracy that highlight the interests of citizens. However, there is still notable support for pluralist and administrative models of democracy, which prioritize political interest groups and elite sources of information. Journalists, overall, might state support for a more citizen-focused and communitarian form of democracy, but there are continuing questions of how this might be reflected in the work of political journalists, specifically when these journalists are often highly dependent upon elite and official sources. This study explores the democratic ideals of journalists through those who cover politics and provides guidance for conceptualizing the relationship between journalism and democracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]