1. Conclusions and Research Pitfalls
- Author
-
McFalls Mh and McFalls Ja
- Subjects
education.field_of_study ,Pregnancy ,business.industry ,media_common.quotation_subject ,Total fertility rate ,Population ,Sequela ,Fertility ,Disease ,medicine.disease ,Sexual intercourse ,Family planning ,medicine ,education ,business ,Demography ,media_common - Abstract
The idea of studying in detail the various diseases that might affect fecundity was prompted by reading Reynolds Farleys "Growth of the Black Population." Farleys health hypothesis focuses primarily on changes in venereal disease (VD) prevalence and was put forword to explain the decline and subsequent risk in US black fertility during the 1st 1/2 of the 20th century. This monograph was designed to examine closely all aspects--medical pathological and epidemiological--of all diseases that might alter human reproductive potential. The examination of pathophysiology of the diseases reveals ways in which diseases can affect fecundity. Absolute coital inability is an infrequent sequela of most of the diseases. However a few diseases are accompanied by impotence complete or partial obstruction of the vaginal opening or genital deformities that make coitus impossible. Male and female conceptive failure are discussed as is pregnancy loss. Disease may lower fertility rates by Davis-Burke intermediate variables other than subfecundity. The importance of selected diseases in historical developing and developed societies is discussed. Pitfalls in population subfecundity research can be divided into 5 general categories: 1) limitations of existing data on the prevalence of diseases and/or subfecundity; 2) effects of the social setting on disease and subfecundity prevalence; 3) persistent myths about certain disease; 4) the unreliability of indirect evidence; and 5) the variability of response to a disease by population.
- Published
- 1984
- Full Text
- View/download PDF