Search

The aims of the current study were to evaluate the bond strength of a new metallic orthodontic bracket with a laser structured base (Discovery, Dentaurum, Ispringen, Germany), and its effects on the site of bond failure and on the behavior of the enamel after debonding. One hundred and twenty recently extracted human premolars were bonded with 1 of 2 types of mechanical interlock base metal brackets: a standard system with a simple foil mesh pad (Minitrim, Dentaurum) and the Discovery bracket. A resin-based, chemically activated bonding system, No-mix (Dentaurum), was used as the adhesive system in this trial. The teeth were immersed in normal saline solution at 37 degrees C for 7 days before debonding and were randomly assigned to different subgroups. A testing machine was used to evaluate tensile and fatigue bond strengths for both brackets. After debonding, the amount of residual adhesive on the bracket and enamel detachment were assessed according to the adhesive remnant index (ARI) and the enamel detachment index (EDI) with a scanning electron microscope and an energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer. The scores obtained from the ARI and the EDI showed that the laser structured base brackets had a significantly higher bond strength (mean +/- SD: 17.1 +/- 0.7 MPa) that was 2 times higher than that observed with the simple foil mesh brackets (mean +/- SD: 8.7 +/- 1.4 MPa) (P <.001). Bond failure with the laser structured base was at the enamel-adhesive interface with an ARI score of 3 in 80% of the teeth, and bond failure with the simple foil mesh base was at the bracket-adhesive interface with an ARI score of 0 in 75% of the teeth. A small area, with less than 10% of the enamel damaged (1 on the EDI) and 1.5 microm in thickness, was observed for both brackets. The laser structured base bracket's bond strength was double that of the simple foil mesh bracket but was equally safe and did not induce significant enamel detachment.

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence on the enamel behavior of debonding two types of orthodontic brackets, bonded with two different adhesives. Ninety recently extracted human premolars were bonded with two types of brackets (30 Minitrim and 60 Discovery). Two bonding protocols were used. The first one consisted in bonding 30 Minitrim and 30 Discovery brackets on etched and dried enamel surfaces with No Mix orthodontic resin. The second one consisted in bonding 30 Discovery brackets on unetched and wet enamel surfaces with a modified glass ionomer cement, Fuji Ortho LC. Teeth were stored in hydrated ambiance at 37 degrees C for 7 days before debonding. A LLOYD (LR 30K) testing machine was used to evaluate the orthogonal tensile bond strength. The debonded base brackets were examined with a scanning electron microscope (JEOL JSM 6400) and qualitatively analyzed with an OXFORD-LINK-ISIS to assess the site of bond failure and the enamel detachments. An Enamel Detachment Index (EDI) was defined. The results showed that the types of orthodontics brackets and adhesives influenced the bond strength and the enamel detachment. The Discovery/No Mix couple presented higher bond strength (214.9 N) than observed with the Discovery/Fuji Ortho LC (98.5 N) or the Minitrim/No Mix (82.3 N) couples. The surfaces of enamel detachment were insignificant and not extended for all brackets. Nevertheless, the Discovery/No Mix couple presented 42% of an EDI score of 1, compared to the Discovery/Fuji Ortho LC and Minitrim/No Mix couples which presented, respectively, 8% an 20% of an EDI score of 1. The laser sculpted base (Discovery) bonded on unetched and wet enamel surfaces with the modified glass ionomer cement (Fuji Ortho LC) offers a good resistance to debonding forces and preserve enamel integrity.