Search

Objectives: Modern dentistry is increasingly focusing on digital procedures, including CAD/CAM technologies. New materials have to resist in a demanding environment that includes secondary caries occurrence. The current study hypothesized that the microbiological behavior of different RBCs for CAD/CAM applications is better than that of their counterparts for direct restorations due to differences in the surface characteristics., Methods: Both direct and CAD/CAM RBCs were tested. Specimens were obtained from each group, polished, cleaned, stored in artificial saliva (1w), then sterilized under UV (24h). Specimens' surface was assessed using profilometry, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction; resin/filler content was assessed using thermogravimetry. After pre-incubation with sterile human saliva (24h), the microbiological behavior of the materials was assessed using four models: Streptococcus mutans adherence (2h), S. mutans biofilm formation in an orbital shaking bioreactor (24h), S. mutans biofilm formation in a continuous-flow bioreactor simulating shear forces (24h), and mixed-plaque formation in the bioreactor (24h). The viable biomass adhering to the specimens' surfaces was measured using a tetrazolium dye-based test. Statistical analysis included verification of normality of distribution and homoscedasticity, then Oneway ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=5%)., Results: When using the bioreactor setup, CAD/CAM RBCs generally yielded lower S. mutans and mixed-plaque biofilm formation compared to direct RBCs. This difference was not evidenced in the first two microbiological models. Differences in manufacturing and curing processes rather than in materials' surface roughness and composition could explain these results., Significance: CAD/CAM RBCs are promising materials from a microbiological point of view, featuring reduced biofilm formation on their surfaces when shear conditions similar to in vivo ones are present., (Copyright © 2020 The Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The interfacial conditions occurring during light-curing procedures of resin-based composites (RBCs) influence their surface properties and therefore the biological behavior of the material. This study aimed to evaluate the influence of different surface curing conditions on in vitro biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans and mixed oral microflora, in the presence or absence of surface salivary pre-conditioning., Methods: Two nanohybrid RBCs and four interfacial curing conditions (open air, argon, nitrogen and glycerin) were evaluated. Surface roughness (SR), surface elemental composition (energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry, EDS) and biofilm formation (S. mutans and oral microcosm) were assessed. Surfaces were observed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Microbiological tests were performed with and without saliva pre-conditioning of the surfaces. EDS analysis was performed before and after biofilm formation, and biofilm morphology was evaluated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed using multi-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc test (p < 0.05)., Results: Interfacial curing conditions significantly influenced SR depending on the tested RBC. EDS analysis showed that surface elemental composition was significantly influenced by the interfacial curing condition depending on the tested RBC. Interfacial curing conditions significantly influenced biofilm formation in both microbiological models in the absence of saliva pre-conditioning, depending on the tested RBC, whereas saliva pre-conditioning abrogated these effects., Conclusions: Surface curing conditions significantly impacted biofilm formation in a material-dependent manner, which was abrogated when surfaces were pre-conditioned with saliva., Clinical Significance: Curing under glycerin did not improve the microbiological performances of the tested RBCs. These results, needing to be confirmed by in vivo data, have the potential to simplify operative procedures in restorative dentistry., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To evaluate the influence of surface treatments of different resin-based composites (RBCs) on S. mutans biofilm formation., Methods: 4 RBCs (microhybrid, nanohybrid, nanofilled, bulk-filled) and 6 finishing-polishing (F/P) procedures (open-air light-curing, light-curing against Mylar strip, aluminum oxide discs, one-step rubber point, diamond bur, multi-blade carbide bur) were evaluated. Surface roughness (SR) (n=5/group), gloss (n=5/group), scanning electron microscopy morphological analysis (SEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) (n=3/group), and S. mutans biofilm formation (n=16/group) were assessed. EDS analysis was repeated after the biofilm assay. A morphological evaluation of S. mutans biofilm was also performed using confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) (n=2/group). The data were analyzed using Wilcoxon (SR, gloss) and two-way ANOVA with Tukey as post-hoc tests (EDS, biofilm formation)., Results: F/P procedures as well as RBCs significantly influenced SR and gloss. While F/P procedures did not significantly influence S. mutans biofilm formation, a significant influence of RBCs on the same parameter was found. Different RBCs showed different surface elemental composition. Both F/P procedures and S. mutans biofilm formation significantly modified this parameter., Conclusions: The tested F/P procedures significantly influenced RBCs surface properties but did not significantly affect S. mutans biofilm formation. The significant influence of the different RBCs tested on S. mutans biofilm formation suggests that material characteristics and composition play a greater role than SR., Clinical Significance: F/P procedures of RBCs may unexpectedly play a minor role compared to that of the restoration material itself in bacterial colonization., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To elucidate the impact of surface properties and the release of fluoride from different glass ionomer cements on biofilm formation., Methods: Standardized specimens manufactured from various classes of glass ionomer cements (GICs), a resin-based composite (RBC), and human enamel were subjected to surface analyses. Subsequent to simulation of salivary pellicle formation, Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation was initiated using a drip flow reactor for 48h and 96h. Biofilms were characterized by determining viable bacterial biomass and 3D biofilm architecture using SEM and CLSM; the release of fluoride from the specimens was measured using the ion selective micro method in dependence on various experimental conditions (incubation with sterile broth/bacteria/acid)., Results: Surface properties and biofilm formation correlated poorly, while the release of fluoride correlated well with viable streptococcal biomass and SEM/CLSM analyses. For all investigated materials, biofilm formation was lower than on enamel. The release of fluoride showed a significant dependency on the experimental conditions applied; the presence of biofilms reduced fluoride release in comparison to sterile incubation conditions., Conclusions: Within the limitations of a laboratory study, the results suggest that biofilm formation on GICs cannot be easily predicted as a function of substratum surface parameters. The release of fluoride from glass ionomer cements contributes to control biofilm formation particularly in its early phases., Clinical Significance: Glass ionomer cements can actively control microbial biofilm formation, while biofilms modulate the release of fluoride from GIC materials., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To evaluate the state of art on the relations between surface properties (surface roughness, topography, surface free energy and chemistry) of resin-based composite materials and microbial adhesion and biofilm formation., Methods: An electronic search using Scopus and PubMed (until May 2015) was conducted applying the following search items: "Plaque OR Biofilm AND Surface chemistry", "Plaque OR Biofilm AND Surface-free energy", "Plaque OR Biofilm AND Roughness", "Surface characteristics AND Composites", "Biofilm AND Surface characteristics"., Results: Surface properties of resin-based composite materials as well as surface treatments can strongly affect bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, although the "ideal" surface features have not been identified yet. Moreover, investigations highlighted that cariogenic biofilm formation may alter materials' surface properties, thus encouraging bacterial adhesion and biofilm formation, starting a "vicious cycle" which might compromise restoration longevity.

Purpose: To evaluate fluoride release and biofilm formation on resin-based composites (RBCs) including surface pre-reacted glass ionomer (S-PRG) filler particles., Materials and Methods: Specimens were prepared from experimental RBCs including different fractions of S-PRG fillers (0/10/30/50/70% w/v). RBCs were light cured against mylar strips (MYL), and 50% of the specimens were additionally polished to a high gloss (POL). Surface roughness (SR), surface free energy (SFE) and fluoride release were determined. Streptococcus mutans biofilm formation (SMBF) was simulated for 48 h and 120 h; adherent viable biomass was assessed using an MTT-based assay., Results: The highest SR was identified for POL specimens manufactured from the RBC with a filler fraction of 70%. For all specimens and surface treatments, polishing caused an increase in surface free energy. For both MYL and POL specimens, increasing the filler fraction coincided with an increased release of fluoride; a higher release of fluoride was identified for POL specimens with filler fractions of 50% and 70% in comparison to their MYL counterparts. Release of fluoride was lower after 120 h than after 48 h. No differences in SMBF were identified between MYL and POL specimens with identical filler fractions after 48 h of biofilm formation; with increasing filler fractions, a tendency towards decreasing SMBF was observed. After 120 h, less SMBF was identified for POL specimens with filler fractions of 30%, 50% and 70% in comparison to corresponding MYL specimens., Conclusion: The inclusion of S-PRG fillers and an effective surface treatment may reduce biofilm formation on RBCs.

Resin‐based composites, now the most prevalent material for restorative dental treatments, are available in a multitude of types. Next‐generation composites are designed to be bio interactive, solving issues such as secondary caries and mechanical failures, thus prolonging the restoration lifespan. To facilitate the discrimination of the bio interactive composite's performance and the identification of the optimal composition, we tested the VIKOR method for multi‐criteria decision‐making analysis. This study encompassed 12 performance parameters and 5 experimental dental composites. We measured density, void content, water sorption, water solubility, polymerization shrinkage, depth of cure, degree of conversion, hardness, compressive strength, and surface roughness as performance parameters, and we tested a conventional BisGMA‐TEGDMA resin blend filled with yttria‐stabilized zirconia (20 wt.%) and tricalcium phosphate. The alignment between computational methods and MATLAB‐based calculations validated the robustness of the assessment, verifying the significance of the conclusions drawn from this comprehensive analysis. Both methods (ENTROPY‐VIKOR and VIKOR‐MATLAB) ranked TZC0 as the top composite. This research provided a comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between material composition, performance attributes, and optimization strategies in dental restorative composites, offering valuable insights for future advancements in restorative dentistry. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Fluoride treatment influenced biofilm formation on glass ionomer cement and enamel. • Fluoride had limited effect on biofilm on resin-modified glass ionomer cement. • Fluoride did not affect biofilm on resin-based composite. • Human enamel serves as a reservoir for fluoride. • The microbiological model had a relevant effect on the experimental outcome. To investigate the influence of recharging dental restorative materials with fluoride on biofilm formation. Specimens produced from a high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and a resin-based composite (RBC) were randomly allotted to incubation in artificial saliva either for one week (AS-1), for five weeks (AS-5), for five weeks including twice/day brushing with 1450 ppm NaF toothpaste (AS-5-brush), or one-time exposition to 5000 ppm NaF after five weeks of incubation (AS-5-exp). Human enamel was used as reference. Surface roughness and the release of fluoride from the specimens was determined; biofilm formation was simulated using mono- or multispecies microbiological models and analysed employing an MTT-based approach and confocal laser-scanning microscopy. Monospecies biofilm formation was significantly reduced on HVGIC in comparison to RMGIC and RBC. It was also reduced on HVGIC and enamel after treatment with fluoride in groups AS-5-brush and AS-5-exp in comparison to AS-5. These effects were particularly pronounced after 24 h, and less pronounced after 48 h of biofilm formation. In the multispecies microbiological model, similar observations were identified for HVGIC, while for enamel a significant reduction in biofilm formation was observed in groups AS-5-brush and AS-5-exp. No significant effect of fluoride treatments was identified for RMGIC and RBC, regardless of the microbiological model applied. These data indicate that biofilm formation on the surfaces of a glass ionomer cement and enamel can be relevantly influenced by treatment with fluoride. Enamel may serve as a fluoride reservoir which requires regular recharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this in vitro study is to evaluate the effect of different acidic media on volumetric wear and surface roughness of CAD/CAM monolithic materials. Forty-eight rectangular specimens were prepared using different CAD/CAM monolithic materials: nanohybrid composite (Grandio Blocks, Voco), resin-based composite (Cerasmart, GC), lithium disilicate (E-Max, Ivoclar), and high-translucency zirconia (Katana STML, Kuraray Noritake). After storage in distilled water at 37 °C for two days, the specimens were tested using a chewing machine with a stainless-steel ball as an antagonist (49N loads, 250,000 cycles). Testing was performed using distilled water, Coca-Cola, and Red Bull as abrasive media. Wear and surface roughness analyses of the CAD/CAM materials were performed using a 3D profilometer and analyzed with two-way analysis of variance and post hoc pairwise comparison procedures. Worn surfaces were examined using scanning electron microscopy. Resin-based materials suffered higher volumetric wear than ceramics (p = 0.00001). Water induced significantly less volumetric wear than the other tested solutions (p = 0.0014), independent of the material tested. High-translucency zirconia showed less surface roughness than all the other materials tested. The selection of monolithic CAD/CAM materials to restore worn dentition due to erosive processes could impact restorative therapy stability over time. Resin-based materials seem to be more influenced by the acidic environment when subjected to a two-body wear test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]