Search

Objectives: The aim of this retrospective clinical study was to investigate the survival rate, technical and biologic complications of leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns after a follow-up time of 13-15 years., Material and Methods: Fifty-three patients with 131 crowns were invited to the follow-up visit. The reconstructions were re-examined clinically and radiographically using the modified USPHS criteria and periodontal parameters of probing pocket depth (PPD), plaque index (PI), sulcus bleeding index (SBI). Patient satisfaction and post-operative sensitivity of the abutment teeth were evaluated with a questionnaire. The overall survival rate and the Kaplan-Meier survival estimate were calculated both on crown and patient level. Technical and biological complications were reported descriptively on crown level. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: Thirty-eight patients (12 men, 26 women) with 93 crowns were examined. The overall survival rate of all the crowns was 79.6% after a mean observation period of 14.4 ± 1.2 years. Most of the failures occurred after 11.1 years. The most common clinical failures were inacceptable ceramic fractures or chippings, which occurred in 5 out of 93 crowns (5.4%) and periodontitis, seen in 4 out of 93 teeth (4.3%). The most frequent technical complications were related to occlusal wear. Biological complications were not common., Conclusions: Leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns showed a high survival rate of 79.6% after an observation period of 13-15 years. Ceramic fractures and periodontitis accounted for the majority of clinical failures., Clinical Significance: Leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic crowns can be considered a safe and predictable treatment choice for restoring both anterior and posterior teeth., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

The aim of the present study was to assess the clinical behaviour of cast gold restorations with respect to define a gold control against current and future ceramic and composite restorations. The study sample included 50 patients with 303 cast gold restorations. All restorations were cemented with a non-adhesive technique. A total of 303 restorations were evaluated clinically and radiographically using modified United States Public Health Service criteria. Restorations recorded as having an A- or a B-rating were defined as successful. Of the 303 restorations, 42 were judged as failures, which resulted in a failure rate of 13.8% for a mean observation time (+/- s.d.) of 18.7 ( +/- 9.5) years. The estimated Kaplan-Meier survival rates (s.e.) were 96.1% (+/- 1.1%) at 10 years, 87.0% (+/- 2.2%) at 20 years and 73.5% (+/- 5.4%) at 30 years. In total, biological reasons were counted 25 times in comparison to 17 technical reasons for those 42 failed cast gold restorations, with 17 secondary caries (40%) as the most common biological reason and with 13 retention losses (31%) as the most common technical reason. The endodontically treated tooth was exclusively identified as a risk factor. The restoration type (inlay versus onlay) did not influence the survival rate.

The survival rate and the reasons for failures of 130 combined fixed-removable reconstructions (CFR), incorporated in 112 patients, were assessed. Each CFR reconstruction was classified depending on its attachments: 76 reconstructions were attached with rigid, precise attachments, and constituted the rigid group; 54 reconstructions were attached with either semi-precision or individual attachments and were defined as the semi-rigid group. Of the 130 reconstructions, 41 were determined as complete successes, 39 as partial successes and 50 as failures, leading to 37 major repairs and to 13 new reconstructions. Three reconstructions failed due to technical reasons, 36 due to biological reasons and for 11 reconstructions, both categories of reasons were responsible for their failure. In total, technical reasons were counted 15 times in comparison to 73 biological reasons for those 50 failed reconstruction, with 29 fractured abutment teeth as the most common biological reason. Within the rigid group, 45 failed reconstructions were observed, whereas within the semi rigid group only 5 failures occurred, leading to an 8-year survival estimate (+/- SD) of 30.1% (+/- 6.9%) for the rigid group and 93.1% (+/- 3.9%) for the semi rigid group. Beside the attachment type, the anatomy of the partially edentulous tooth arch in form of the free-end situation and the dentate opposing jaw were identified as risk factors.