Search

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the influence of height and length variations of alumina ceramics manufactured by stereolithography on deformations caused by the manufacturing process and on the 3D shrinkage ratio to control the final dimensions and improve the adaptation of stereolithographic ceramic dental prostheses. Two different U-shaped models were designed with variable heights or lengths. The specimens were manufactured by stereolithography and were scanned using a microtomographic device before and after the heat treatment. Dimensional variations were measured using inspection software. The number and surface of layers of alumina ceramic influenced the reliability of the stereolithography manufacturing but did not influence the 3D shrinkage ratio. The larger the layer surface, the larger the deformation of the ceramic. Dental ceramics manufactured by stereolithography with smallest layer surface are the most reliable. This helps in the selection of the build orientation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate two agents for bonding denture bases and teeth manufactured either by stereolithography (SLA) or by the subtractive mixed technique. Methods: Two types of cylinders [small for the tooth resin and large for the base resin) were designed using CAD software according to the ANSI/ADA 15-2008 (R2013)] specification. For SLA manufacturing, 30 small cylinders were shaped with Denture Teeth resin and 30 large cylinders with Denture Base resin. For the mixed technique, 30 large cylinders were manufactured by SLA with V-print dentbase resin, and 30 small cylinders were milled with a CediTEC DT disk. Half the specimens were bonded with liquid Denture Base resin and half with CediTEC Primer and Adhesive, according to the manufacturers' protocols. Shear bond strength was measured using a universal testing machine. The failure mode was noted for all the specimens. Results: The shear bond strength values were not significantly different between the groups (P> 0.05). Specimens bonded with liquid Denture Base resin displayed cohesive failure (P> 0.05, Χ²= 0). Of the specimens bonded with CediTEC Primer and Adhesive, cohesive failures were observed with five specimens manufactured with the SLA technique and one specimen manufactured with the mixed technique (P> 0.05, Χ²= 3.33). The Chi-square test results were significant between groups with different bonding agents regardless of the technique used (P< 0.001). Within the limitations of the present study, even if the shear bond strength values were similar, the failure mode analysis suggests that the uncured liquid Denture Base resin may be more effective than the CediTEC Primer and Adhesive for bonding denture bases and teeth manufactured either by SLA or the mixed technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]