Search

Purpose: we carried out a phase III randomized trial to compare vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen to gemcitabine-cisplatin regimen, and to a sequential administration of gemcitabine-ifosfamide followed by vinorelbine-cisplatin or the opposite sequence of vinorelbine-cisplatin followed by ifosfamide-gemcitabine according to the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis in patients with locally advanced unresectable stage IIIB or metastatic stage IV non-small cell lung cancer. The primary endpoint was survival parameters, while secondary endpoints included analysis of response rates and toxicity., Patients and Methods: patients were randomized to receive: (a) gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8 and 15 plus ifosfamide 1500 mg/m(2) on days 8-12 with mesna uroprotection (GI regimen) followed by vinorelbine 25 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 1 (GI --> VC regimen); (b) the opposite sequence (VC --> GI); (c) vinorelbine plus cisplatin as above described (VC regimen); or (d) gemcitabine 1400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus cisplatin 100 mg/m(2) on day 8 (GC regimen). All regimens were given every 4 weeks. All patients were chemotherapy naive and had a ECOG PS 0-2., Results: 400 patients were enrolled into the trial. Interim analysis after inclusion of 243 patients showed that ORR were 19% in the GI --> VC arm, 32% in the inverse sequence arm (CV --> GI), 42% in the VC arm, and 30% in the GC arm. The VC arm was statistically superior over the GI --> VC arm (p = 0.0074), but not over the other regimens. Median TTP was 3.1 months in the GI --> VC arm versus 5.0 months in the VC --> GI arm (p = 0.014). For these reasons the GI --> VC and VC --> GI arm were closed since the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis was rejected. Accrual in the VC and GC arms continued up to 140 and 138 patients respectively. Final ORR were 44% for the VC regimen (4 CR), and 34% for the GC regimen (1 CR). This difference was statistically significant (p = 0.032). OS was 9.0 and 8.2 months, respectively, with no statistically significant difference. The 1-year survival rate was 24 and 20%, respectively for VC and GC regimens. As expected the incidence of phlebitis was higher in the VC arm, while thrombocytopenia, flu-like syndrome and asthenia were more frequent in the GC arm., Conclusions: the results of this trial indicate that the combination of vinorelbine and cisplatin and that of gemcitabine and cisplatin are equivalent in terms of median TTP and OS, although the vinorelbine-cisplatin regimen is associated with a higher ORR. Both regimens may be considered as reference treatments for future studies. Moreover, our data reject the 'worst drug rule' hypothesis of sequential treatments in NSCCL at least with the combination used in this study., (Copyright 2002 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.)

Purpose: To evaluate the therapeutic activity and toxicity of gemcitabine in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma., Patients and Methods: Twenty-four consecutive patients with recurrent- and/or metastatic urothelial carcinoma pretreated with first line cisplatin-based chemotherapy were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2/week intravenously diluted in 250 cc of normal saline as 20 minutes infusion for 3 consecutive weeks followed by a 1 week rest period. Chemotherapy was repeated every 28 days., Results: All enrolled patients were evaluable for objective response accordingly to an intent-to-treat analysis. A complete response was achieved in 1 patient (4%) and a partial response in 6 cases (25%) for an overall response rate of 29% (confidence limits 18%-39%). The median duration of objective responses was 7.4+ months (range 3.0+/12.8). Six patients showed no changes (25%) with a median duration of 4.0 months. A subjective improvement in tumor-related symptoms was reported by all responding patients, and in 3 patients with no change. Six out of 9 patients with symptomatic bone lesions had a subjective improvement with reduction in analgesic drugs consumption. Objective responses were observed at all sites of disease. The median overall survival was 13.0+ months (range 4.0/16.2+). Over a total of 76 cycles (a mean of 3.1 cycles/patient), grade 1-2 leukopenia was seen in 9 patients (37%), grade 1-2 thrombocytopenia in 4 patients (17%), and grade 1 anemia in only 2 cases (8%). Grade 3 leukopenia was seen in 3 cases (12.5%). Grade 4 leukopenia or grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were not seen. Gastrointestinal toxicity was very mild., Conclusions: Single agent gemcitabine at the dose of 1000 mg/m2 on a weekly schedule is active, at least in terms of objective response rate and tumor-related symptoms palliation, against pretreated urothelial carcinoma with good tolerability. These results compare favorably with those achieved with the most active drugs such as cisplatin and methotrexate.