Search

Background: Inhaled medications are recommended as first-line treatment for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and can reduce exacerbations and hospitalizations. Low health literacy is associated with poor inhaler technique. Objective: This study examined whether handouts written specifically for patients with low health literacy are more effective in showing patients how to use their medications when compared to standard education materials. Methods: A prospective, experimental study was performed at a community-based hospital. Patients included in the study were admitted to the hospital with a diagnosis of COPD, taking at least 1 inhaled medication and identified as having low health literacy based on a Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine—Short Form. Low health literacy handouts were compared against the standard hospital educational materials for inhalers. Correct technique during each demonstration was evaluated using a standardized checklist. Results: Mean baseline scores for inhaler technique were 12.2 ± 2.2 steps correct for the control group and 13.4 ± 1.3 for the low health-literacy group of the 18 maximum points (P = nonsignificant). The mean change in inhaler technique score for the control group was 1.0 ± 1.8, while the mean change in inhaler technique score for the low health-literacy group was 2.1 ± 2.7 (P = .03). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose. Results of a study to determine the impact of physician use of a medication order set on compliance with national quality standards for acute stroke treatment are presented. Methods. The medical records of adult patients treated for ischemic stroke at three certified primary stroke centers within a large healthcare system were retrospectively reviewed to assess compliance with eight mandatory standards of care. Overall adherence to the standards and rates of compliance with individual standards were compared in random samples of patients treated with or without physician use of an order set providing guidance on acute stroke pharmacotherapy and other aspects of stroke management. Results. Treatment records indicated use of the acute stroke order set in 58% of the 120 patient cases reviewed. Individual patients who were treated without physician use of the order set were more than twice as likely as those in the comparator group to receive care that was not in compliance with at least one of the eight mandatory quality standards (odds ratio, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-4.05; p < 0.001). Use of the order set was associated with significantly improved adherence to three standards: venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, stroke education, and statin therapy at discharge. Conclusion. A retrospective review of the treatment records of patients hospitalized for acute stroke showed that adherence to national guidelines was increased when providers used a standard order set [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: African Americans suffer disproportionately from the adverse health consequences of smoking, and also report substantially lower socioeconomic status than Whites and other racial/ethnic groups in the U.S. Although socioeconomic disadvantage is known to have a negative influence on smoking cessation rates and overall health, little is known about the influence of socioeconomic status on smoking cessation specifically among African Americans. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to characterize the impact of several individual- and area-level indicators of socioeconomic status on smoking cessation among African Americans. Data were collected as part of a smoking cessation intervention study for African American smokers (N = 379) recruited from the Houston, Texas, metropolitan area, who participated in the study between 2005 and 2007. The separate and combined influences of individual-level (insurance status, unemployment, education, and income) and area-level (neighborhood unemployment, education, income, and poverty) indicators of socioeconomic status on continuous smoking abstinence were examined across time intervals using continuation ratio logit modeling. Individual-level analyses indicated that unemployment was significantly associated with reduced odds of smoking abstinence, while higher income was associated with greater odds of abstinence. However, only unemployment remained a significant predictor of abstinence when unemployment and income were included in the model together. Area-level analyses indicated that greater neighborhood unemployment and poverty were associated with reduced odds of smoking abstinence, while greater neighborhood education was associated with higher odds of abstinence. However, only neighborhood unemployment remained significantly associated with abstinence status when individual-level income and unemployment were included in the model. Overall, findings suggest that individual- and area-level unemployment have a negative impact on smoking cessation among African Americans. Addressing unemployment through public policy and within smoking cessation interventions, and providing smoking cessation treatment for the unemployed may have a beneficial impact on tobacco-related health disparities. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]