Search

Background: School meal programs have a large reach and thus are ideal environments in which to implement interventions targeting improved youth eating behaviors and reduced food waste. This systematic review summarizes the evidence on the effectiveness of school meal nudge interventions on influencing children's eating and waste behaviors. Methods: Inclusion criteria required studies have participants in primary or secondary school (grades K-12) with interventions that occurred during school lunch or breakfast in the cafeteria and included at least one of the following outcomes: selection, consumption, waste, or school meal participation. Analyses of intervention outcomes were restricted to studies of strong and moderate quality. Results: Twenty-nine studies were included in the quality assessment. Included interventions fell into three categories: 1) placement/convenience, 2) marketing/promotion, or 3) variety/portions. The 20 strong and moderate quality studies included in outcome analyses generally used strong data collection methods and study designs, but were limited by an overall lack of intervention fidelity checks. Multi-component interventions often did not use methods that allowed for separate analyses of outcomes for different intervention components. Conclusions: School meal nudge interventions were positively associated with food selection, and had an inconsistent relationship with food consumption. There were few studies evaluating the impact of nudge interventions on meal participation or food waste. The limited evidence available links nudges to improved meal participation, as well as undesirable increases in food waste. Future research in this area should use methods that incorporate implementation metrics, attend to systems factors, and allow the outcomes of individual intervention components to be isolated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We investigated whether the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S) predicted odds of food insecurity (FI) among adults and their children. Methods: A cross-sectional panel of parent-child dyads completed an online questionnaire. Eligible dyads included parents with household income below the 2015 median ($52,250 USD/year) and their self-selected household child between the ages of 13 to 17 years. An online questionnaire assessed: (1) FI using the 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module and the Food Security Survey Module for Youth; (2) perseverance and determination using the validated 8-item Grit-S; and (3) sociodemographic FI predictors. Logit regression models estimated the relationship between odds of FI and predictors among parents and children, separately. Results: Among 252 parents, 61.1% reported household FI. Parents' Grit-S score (N = 179) was associated with a significantly lower odds of household FI (OR= 0.4; 95%CI= 0.2, 0.8; p < .01) while adjusting for established predictors. Mean (±SD) Grit-S was 3.1 (±0.7). Children's Grit-S score (N = 178) was associated with a significantly lower odds of child FI (OR= 0.6; 95%CI= 0.4, 0.9; p < .05) while adjusting for established predictors. Conclusions: Perseverance and determination, also known as "grit," may be one further explanation for why some poor households are food secure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Nutrition labels at the point of purchase are recommended to improve food choice, yet food choice does not always translate into food consumption. It is important to understand the relationship between label use, food selection, servings, and consumption. Previous research, which has relied on self-reported intake or inferred label use or intake based on sales data, has not adequately answered this question. Objective To combine survey and meal photographic data to compare food selection, servings, and consumption between label users and nonusers. Design Diners were surveyed in two cross-sectional waves during the fall 2014 semester. Food selections were recorded, and pre- and postmeal photographs were taken of diners’ plate. Photographs were coded to identify the selection, servings, and consumption of MyPlate food categories. Participants/setting Convenience sample of 1,069 diners (39% women, 53% freshman) in two university dining halls. Students had to be older than age 18 years and just beginning their meal to participate. Main outcome measures Selection, servings, and consumption of MyPlate food categories for label users and nonusers. Statistical analyses performed Differences in food selection were tested via χ 2 tests, and differences in adjusted least squares means for servings and consumption were tested via t tests. Results A greater proportion of nutrition label users selected fruits, vegetables, and beans and fewer selected potatoes compared with nonusers. In addition, fewer label users selected fried foods and foods with added sugars (all P values <0.05). Label users served themselves and consumed more vegetables and fewer potatoes and refined grains compared with nonusers (all P values <0.05). Conclusions Our results suggest label users behave differently compared with nonusers. Based on the meals observed, these differences appear more qualitative in nature (selecting different foods) than quantitative (selecting more or less food). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a study which examined spice and herb (S/H) use with vegetables and its relation to consumer characteristics in the U.S. Topics covered include the frequent use of S/H by younger Asian/Pacific Islander consumers, the higher S/H use when cooking vegetables among women and the potential benefit of interventions encouraging S/H use with vegetables to low-income male and white respondents.

Background Nutrition labels may be important predictors of dietary selections among college students; however, awareness and use are not well understood in this population. Objective The aim of this work was to investigate the influence of label placement on label awareness and use, including influences over time. We also aimed to identify predictors of awareness and use, preferred label information, and reasons for label nonuse. Design Cross-sectional surveys were administered in three 1-week waves over 3 months. Participants/setting Two thousand seven hundred twenty-nine students aged 18 years or older in four university dining halls. Intervention Nutrition labels were placed on sneeze guards in two dining halls and directly in front of food in two comparator dining halls. Main outcome measures Label awareness and use were measured using 5-point Likert scales. Reasons for label nonuse and preferred types of information were assessed by response frequencies. Statistical analysis performed Logistic regression was used to determine predictors of label awareness and use. To test for differences in information preferences between label users and nonusers, χ 2 tests were used. Results Nutrition label awareness and use did not vary by label placement or over time. Awareness was related to being obese, having higher perceived stress, taking nutrition classes, having good/excellent eating habits, eating breakfast, tracking food intake, and exercising five or more times per week. Use was related to being a woman, being overweight, having higher perceived stress, having good/excellent eating habits, eating breakfast, tracking food intake, and exercising three or more times per week. Information preferences differed by use, but calories, fat, and protein were the most preferred pieces of information overall. Not caring, already having a good idea about nutrition information, and not having time were the top reasons for label nonuse. Conclusions Label awareness and use did not change with label placement or over time. Making labels easy to read and including preferred information may encourage greater awareness and use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Recent legislation has required calorie labels on restaurant menus as a means of improving Americans' health. Despite the growing research in this area, no consensus has been reached on the effectiveness of menu labels. This suggests the possibility of heterogeneity in responses to caloric labels across people with different attitudes and demographics. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential relationships between caloric intake and diners' socio-economic characteristics and attitudes in a restaurant field experiment that systematically varied the caloric information printed on the menus. Methods: We conducted a field experiment in a full service restaurant where patrons were randomly assigned to one of three menu treatments which varied the amount of caloric information printed on the menus (none, numeric, or symbolic calorie label). At the conclusion of their meals, diners were asked to complete a brief survey regarding their socio-economic characteristics, attitudes, and meal selections. Using regression analysis, we estimated the number of entrée and extra calories ordered by diners as a function of demographic and attitudinal variables. Additionally, irrespective of the menu treatment to which a subject was assigned, our study identified which types of people are likely to be low-, medium-, and high-calorie diners. Results: Results showed that calorie labels have the greatest impact on those who are least health conscious. Additionally, using a symbolic calorie label can further reduce the caloric intake of even the most health conscious patrons. Finally, calorie labels were more likely to influence the selection of the main entrée as opposed to supplemental items such as drinks and desserts. Conclusions: If numeric calorie labels are implemented (as currently proposed), they are most likely to influence consumers who are less health conscious -- probably one of the key targets of this legislation. Unfortunately, numeric labels did little for those consumers who were already more knowledgeable about health and nutrition. To reach a broader group of diners, a symbolic calorie label may be preferred as it reduced caloric intake across all levels of health consciousness. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]