Search

Objective: The association between jaw function and income in patients with temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) remain unclear. The aim of this study was to explore this association and its relationship with anxiety and depression. Subjects and Methods: A total of 451 TMD patients, including 361 males and 90 females, participated in this study. The sociodemographic information of patients and their questionnaires including the Generalised Anxiety Disorder 7‐item (GAD‐7), Patient Health Questionnaire 9‐item (PHQ‐9), and Jaw Functional Limitation Scale‐8 (JFLS‐8) were collected. Patients were divided into the high‐income and low‐income groups based on a household per capita income of 6000 RMB per month. Multiple regression and mediation analysis were used to explore the association between variables. The bootstrap method was applied to estimate confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Higher JFLS‐8 scores were significantly correlated with higher GAD‐7 scores (r = 0.361, p <.001), PHQ‐9 scores (r = 0.339, p <.001). Females and patients with low income had statistically higher JFLS‐8 scores (p <.01, p <.001). Mediation analysis with 10 000 bootstrap simulations revealed a significant direct association between JFLS‐8 scores and income (−2.920, 95% CI [−4.757, −1.044], p =.002). A significant indirect association of JFLS‐8 scores with income via GAD‐7 scores and PHQ‐9 scores was also observed (−0.889, 95% CI [−1.728, −0.164], p =.025), accounting for 23.3% of the total association. Conclusions: Low income is associated with impaired jaw function via anxiety and depression in patients with TMD. Clinicians may need to pay more attention to the psychological status of low‐income TMD patients in clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the association between the occipital spur length and craniofacial morphology in individuals with occipital spur (OS). Methods: The study included cephalometric images from 451 individuals (196 females, 255 males, age range was 9–84 years). The spur length and craniofacial characteristics were evaluated using cephalograms. Based on spur length, subjects were divided into two groups: the OS group (N = 209) and the enlarged occipital spur (EOS) group (N = 242). Descriptive statistics, Independent T-test, Mann–Whitney U test, chi-square test, Kruskal–Wallis test, and age- and sex-based stratified analyses were performed. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: Males had significantly larger spur length than females. Spur length was shorter in individuals under 18 than the groups over 18. After adjusting for gender and age, ramus height, mandibular body length, effective length of maxilla, effective length of mandible, anterior cranial base length, posterior cranial base length, anterior facial height, posterior facial height, facial height index, and lower anterior facial height had statistically significant differences between OS group and EOS group. Conclusions: Males exhibit greater spur length than females. Patients under 18 had a shorter spur length than adults. Linear craniofacial measurements were found to be greater in subjects with EOS than the individuals with OS. The craniofacial growth and development of an individual might be associated with EOS. The causal relationship between EOS and craniofacial development requires further longitudinal studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]